Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,053
- 17,043
Prove you’re smarter and answer my question and beat me in a straight up debate then. Should be easy since I’m such an idiotWaged war what a idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prove you’re smarter and answer my question and beat me in a straight up debate then. Should be easy since I’m such an idiotWaged war what a idiot.
So….. there are no specific charges for insurrection™. Just Dems / Socialists screeching, hysterical rants.There is no criminal charge or indictment.
This is civil court, not criminal.
There are no criminal charges in civil court. Are you aware that there is a difference?So….. there are no specific charges for insurrection™. Just Dems / Socialists screeching, hysterical rants.
There are no criminal charges in civil court. Are you aware that there is a difference?
Settle down, chuckles. My question was intended to have some relevance, some connection to the thread topic.
You ran for copying and pasting irrelevant piffle.
I do not agree. Not to be going off on you or others, but this is not the case. Concessions are not covered by law. No candidate must concede. Democrats came up with this imaginary law.no. I see nothing wrong with what they did.
They both conceded their losses, peacefully....and under the provisions of the law, and courts.
Trump did not, and still, 3 1/2 years later has not.
And trump took illegal, yes illegal ACTIONS, to steal my and others, vote from them. Democrats are not the thieves, Trump and Trumpets are....
LOL. It’s the children who resort to the “you surrender”, slogan.LOLOL
By "irrelevant," you mean your surrender to my proving there is precedence to supporting the Colorado court's ruling, which is completely relevant to this thread.
You people are traitors to my country you are my biggest enemy and you are hated by every patriot in this country for your treason. That includes me , what would I gain by beating some putz who's opinion is worthless. to me. The logic just isn't there.Prove you’re smarter and answer my question and beat me in a straight up debate then. Should be easy since I’m such an idiot
what a fricken clown.Prove you’re smarter and answer my question and beat me in a straight up debate then. Should be easy since I’m such an idiot
Do you think a person disqualified that is not meeting the qualification of 35 years, or a natural born citizen, believes they are being robbed of due process?Again, Trump was robbed of due process. Here in America, we don’t punish people for unproven accusations.
Yep, and OJ was aquitted of double murder. Should everyone who commits double murder be acquitted?
Smith is done
Your racism is just off the charts. Wow.He was acquitted of murder in criminal court. That's not a precedence. It's a jury following the court's instructions.
But the relevance to this case is that even though OJ was found not guilty in criminal court, he was still found responsible for their deaths in civil court.
No a majority believe in people being permitted to make their own choices and decisions. They employ their brains rather than declaring them government directed property.A major majority of this country support Colorado's decision to not let scum bag on the ballot. but also a majority say the fed supreme court will over ride it because they will do the bidding of Scum Bag and sell out this country , it's constitution and law. They will then need to be replaced as enemy's of this country.
But that are facts. If you’re 34 years old, or you were born in Timbucktoo, those are not in question.Do you think a person disqualified that is not meeting the qualification of 35 years, or a natural born citizen, believes they are being robbed of due process?
The plaintiffs argued successfully that Trump’s specific actions on a specific day specifically constituted insurrection.Are you aware of any specific charges for insurrection™ ?
You Dem / Socialist Trump humpers are obsessed with the insurrection™ slogan.
Yes, in a trial where he defended himself and a jury of his peers made the decision.He was acquitted of murder in criminal court. That's not a precedence. It's a jury following the court's instructions.
But the relevance to this case is that even though OJ was found not guilty in criminal court, he was still found responsible for their deaths in civil court.