ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,512
- 54,281
If any judges on SCOTUS side with Colorado, should they be removed from the bench?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup. For a bunch of libs screaming how Trump will take away our constitutional rights, look at what THEY are doing! So afraid that the majority of citizens in their state will vote for Trump that they knock no, off the ballot.This. ^^^
Taking someone off a ballot is a loss of rights, it requires a criminal conviction.
Constitution 101
This. ^^^
Taking someone off a ballot is a loss of rights, it requires a criminal conviction.
Constitution 101
Affirmative Action Jackson has as much a chance of being removed from the bench for failing to restore Trump’s constitutional rights stolen from him as does Affirmative Action Gay being removed from Harvard for refusing to condemn calls for genocide of Jews by her students and violating her university’s OWN code on plagiarism.If any judges on SCOTUS side with Colorado, should they be removed from the bench?
Trump should sue every last one of you fuckers for slander.He wasn’t and that’s irrelevant. You are going to remain perpetually confused until you get this.
Affirmative Action Jackson has as much a chance of being removed from the bench for failing to restore Trump’s constitutional rights stolen from him as does Affirmative Action Gay being removed from Harvard for refusing to condemn calls for genocide of Jews by her students and violating her university’s OWN code on plagiarism.
Trump should sue every last one of you fuckers for slander.
More than that, you're engaged in a conspiracy to deny a man's rights which is criminal and carries severe penalties.
There was not an insurrection "just because you say so". Or even just because some fucktard judges say so. It is NOT YOUR CALL, and it's entirely fucking ludicrous to believe such a thing can be adjudicated in civil court.
If it can, then let's hold the Democrats financially responsible for the 2 billion dollars in property damage they caused when they supported and promoted AND FUNDED racial riots.
Huh? In which trial did OJ defend himself?
Well you aren’t doing yourself any favors when you dodge a substantive debate to go off on meaningless emotional rants like you just did. That just makes you sound like the idiot. If you had an ounce of intelligence you’d engage and make me look stupid by beating me with facts and better arguments. That doesn’t seem to be what you’re interested in though. Why’s that?You people are traitors to my country you are my biggest enemy and you are hated by every patriot in this country for your treason. That includes me , what would I gain by beating some putz who's opinion is worthless. to me. The logic just isn't there.
All I can do is throw out the challenge. Nothing I can do if you want to run away. That’s pretty weak thoughwhat a fricken clown.
You guys didn’t want a jury when you wanted to take away our ability to vote, so I don’t know what youre complaining about here.Juries don’t play nice with kangaroo
So
No jury
LOL
Hisses the idiot who claims precedence is not relevant to this case.
The constitution doesn’t say who decides. Historically, state courts have usually been dealt with this.He was being accused of a federal crime. Congress decides on insurrection, not a handful of Democrats in Colorado.
Depends on what you mean by charge.The insurrection™ conspiracy is your perpetual obsession.
Do you still insist that Trump is facing that charge?
The question was posed. What was the intent? The question didn't mention Confederates either.Nope. Insurrection or rebellion.
Section 3 never once mentions confederates.
You guys didn’t want a jury when you wanted to take away our ability to vote, so I don’t know what youre complaining about here.
It’s not. There is no charge against Trump for insurrection™ no matter how loudly you screech out that conspiracy theory.
I agree with everything you say, but “insurrection” is not a trademarked word - if one can even trademark a word.It’s not. There is no charge against Trump for insurrection™ no matter how loudly you screech out that conspiracy theory.
You were ignorant of the fact Tater’s illegals have violently attacked our government. I educated your stupid ass.Oh, Dumbfuck? Are you asserting that was insurrection?