Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Faun]

Who are “the others”?

• Kenneth H. Worthy: Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N.C. 199 (1869), appeal dismissed, 76 U.S. 611 (1869)
• William L. Tate: In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308, 309 (1869)
• J.D. Watkins: Louisiana ex rel. Sandlin v. Watkins, 21 La. Ann. 631 (La. 1869)
• Zebulon B. Vance: The Election Case of Joseph C. Abbott v. Zebulon B. Vance and Matt W. Ransom of North Carolina (1872)
• A.F. Gregory: A Case Under the 14th Amendment, Daily Dispatch
• Victor L. Berger: Cannon’s Precedents, Ch. 157, § 56
• Couy Griffin: New Mexico ex rel White v. Griffin, 2022 WL 4295619 (N.M. Dist. Sept. 6, 2022), appeal dismissed and reconsideration denied, No. S-1-SC-39571 (N.M. Feb. 16, 2023)
• John H. Christy: Hinds’ Precedents, Ch. 14, § 459 ; Col. John H. Christy Obituary, Calhoun Times (Mar. 3, 1877)

 

[Hollie]

Ok, so now everyone here knows you have no idea what seditious conspiracy is. Thanks for that concession.

I as’plained you that seditious conspiracy is not insurrection. Does the spelling of those words confuse you? Do you not understand that words that are spelled differently often convey different meaning / concepts?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

^ Still lying. But that’s ok. It’s your one tool, The Dainty-Reawakened.

You know full well about DevNell. You've posted about it over and over, and over, and over...again.

Go change your scream name again, .

BackAgain: that’s of course is none of your business. I’ve had three. You’ve had two. You jealous or just a retarded hypocrite?

Dante: There you go again...

Wrong.

And none of mine were because the board chased me away -- like you - The Welcher.

 

[Hollie]

• Kenneth H. Worthy: Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N.C. 199 (1869), appeal dismissed, 76 U.S. 611 (1869)
• William L. Tate: In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308, 309 (1869)
• J.D. Watkins: Louisiana ex rel. Sandlin v. Watkins, 21 La. Ann. 631 (La. 1869)
• Zebulon B. Vance: The Election Case of Joseph C. Abbott v. Zebulon B. Vance and Matt W. Ransom of North Carolina (1872)
• A.F. Gregory: A Case Under the 14th Amendment, Daily Dispatch
• Victor L. Berger: Cannon’s Precedents, Ch. 157, § 56
• Couy Griffin: New Mexico ex rel White v. Griffin, 2022 WL 4295619 (N.M. Dist. Sept. 6, 2022), appeal dismissed and reconsideration denied, No. S-1-SC-39571 (N.M. Feb. 16, 2023)
• John H. Christy: Hinds’ Precedents, Ch. 14, § 459 ; Col. John H. Christy Obituary, Calhoun Times (Mar. 3, 1877)

What is point in your frantic cutting and pasting? None of your cutting and pasting has anything to do with the thread topic.

 

[Faun]

You are that light in your shoes?

So even you don't know what you're rambling about.

Figures.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Okay my fellow MAGAs and law abiding citizens. Should they be given the treatment like Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett got outside their homes by radical leftists? They've been identified. They've committed treachery!

Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

The unelected justices of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the people of Colorado cannot vote for former President Donald Trump on the ballot for the 2024 presidential election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Help keep Trolls in check

Kavanaugh and Barrett, deserve privacy

 

[BackAgain]

You know full well about DevNell. You've posted about it over and over, and over, and over...again.

I’ve heard that name before. Unlike you, though, you lying ass sucker, I don’t commit all this bullshit to memory.

BackAgain: that’s of course is none of your business. I’ve had three. You’ve had two. You jealous or just a retarded hypocrite?

Dante: There you go again...

Wrong.

And none of mine were because the board chased me away -- like you - The Welcher.

Repeating your prior post is your penchant for proving how mindless and ineffectual you are.

It works.

 

[Faun]

What is point in your frantic cutting and pasting? None of your cutting and pasting has anything to do with the thread topic.

Holyfuckingshit!

You are completely brain-dead.

I point out there have been others banned from holding public office despite not being convicted of insurrection...

You ask me who they were...

I show you who they were, with links to their court cases...

And now you run for the hills, screaming incoherently.

 

[Hollie]

Holyfuckingshit!

You are completely brain-dead.

I point out there have been others banned from holding public office despite not being convicted of insurrection...

You ask me who they were...

I show you who they were, with links to their court cases...

And now you run for the hills, screaming incoherently.

Settle down, chuckles. My question was intended to have some relevance, some connection to the thread topic.

You ran for copying and pasting irrelevant piffle.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Help keep Trolls in check

Kavanaugh and Barrett, deserve privacy. Like the Beatles said Let it be

 

[ColonelAngus]

Holyfuckingshit!

You are completely brain-dead.

I point out there have been others banned from holding public office despite not being convicted of insurrection...

You ask me who they were...

I show you who they were, with links to their court cases...

And now you run for the hills, screaming incoherently.

Yep, and OJ was aquitted of double murder. Should everyone who commits double murder be acquitted?

 

[jbander]

How can you prove that they waged war if they were never convicted of insurrection or rebellion?

Waged war what a idiot.

Combining this sort of superlative-wielding mentality with support for the geriatric zombie called Biden makes it obvious that Trump is the last defense against total madness.

You choose the pussy grabber who is by far the biggest threat this country has , a worm of a person without values ,a criminal and rapist and insurrectionist. I keep on asking can these brain dead fucks be as stupid as they seem to be by what they say and I'm convinced that you traitors are as scummy as you seem.

 

[Marener]

Sorry if the legal process is complicated for you. Courts deal with specific charges. That’s part of due process. Were arguments also presented about Trump posting tweets that hurt the feelings of Dems / Socialists?

Yes. The specific charge was that Trump was/is an insurrectionist because of January 6th.

 

[Care4all]

Here is what pisses me off.
1. Al Gore declared he won the election vs Bush. Gore was never prosecuted.
2. Hillary Clinton still insists she won the election vs Trump. Hillary never had to hire a lawyer to defend her.
3. Trump declared he won and he is being tried in courts with the intent to put him in prison.

Do you see something wrong in that?

no. I see nothing wrong with what they did.

They both conceded their losses, peacefully....and under the provisions of the law, and courts.

Trump did not, and still, 3 1/2 years later has not.

And trump took illegal, yes illegal ACTIONS, to steal my and others, vote from them. Democrats are not the thieves, Trump and Trumpets are....

 

[Marener]

Well why not? He wasn’t even charged with insurrection. He certainly wasn’t convicted of of it. But four leftwing Democrat judges THINK he’s an insurrectionist, and he’s being punished for it.

You think that’s in keeping with American’s values? If so, I say we get four rightwing judges to say they THINK you incited a murder, and toss your butt in prison - without a trial.

In America, we do not punish people for crimes they’re not even charged with - even if they’re a Republican you don’t like.

Trump had a trial. He had due process. He's being kept off the ballot, not thrown in jail.

You tell me if this is in keeping with American's values. Your party tried to get 5 rightwing judges to say that some states that voted for Joe Biden don't get to participate in the electoral college because you don't know how they managed their election.

Your party tried to punish people for voter fraud when they're not even charged with it.

 

[Hollie]

Yes. The specific charge was that Trump was/is an insurrectionist because of January 6th.

What specific charge?

Provide a link to an indictment for that charge.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Constitutionally.... States run elections....they vet candidates as to whether they can qualify and be on their state ballots, not the federal govt.

Smith is done

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How so?

Smith is done

 

[Marener]

What specific charge?

Provide a link to an indictment for that charge.

There is no criminal charge or indictment.

This is civil court, not criminal.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You wingnuts were saying that about Colorado.

You leftist just got the pucker factor 10 with the latest jack smith news