Zone1 Embryos and Personhood

[sparky]

All this makes me wonder if Walt's frozen gourd gets a mail in vote?

~S~

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Whether you are headed to the store with your unborn baby or to kill it , if someone commits a crime that takes the baby's life THAT IS HOMICIDE

See post nfbw 240428 Veapyz00020

The “someone” in that scenario must harm the only conscious human being in order to also harm the not yet developed human organism that is without consciousness during the first 24 weeks of gestation as part of one conscious person’s body, The “someone” is criminally responsible for taking the life of an adult human being and her “potential” child. But it is absurd to apply that rule of law to the only conscious person during early months of pregnancy if she decides early on that she doers not wish to take the risk that comes with going with full term gestation and delivering the infant inside her body to the world.

 

[ding]

How can one conscious human being have competing rights with herself?

It's easy when you don't dehumanize the distinct and separate person inside her.

Abortion should be a misdemeanor.

 

[DudleySmith]

The issue of abortion is one of competing rights: weighing a woman’s right to bodily autonomy

She exercises her right to autonomy when she chooses to have the kind of sex that can result in babies. That doesn't imply she can now kill babies that result from her exercise of free choices; she can freely choose not to have that kind of sex easily. This is only 'complicated' for sociopaths like yourself and Burb Brat Nation, who lack any basic morals and worship the cult of Self. There is no 'competition' outside of using homocides to correct a personal mistake, i.e. Mafia morality.

 

[progressive hunter]

How can one conscious human being have competing rights with herself?

the child inside her is not her,,