Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #541
Once again, Correlation does not prove cause and effect!
When people who would rob a house know that a large percentage of homeowners in an area own firearms are they more or less likely to attempt a home break in?
Very few homes suffer home invasions, burglary is usually committed when no one is home.
Nothing in my position on gun control has ever proposed that the 2nd A. Right be repealed. I respect the right to own and possess a gun to protect one's home or business as long as the gun owner is sane, sober and responsible. Thus my advocacy for Licensing and Registration, which ought to be a states right's issue, and one supported by responsible gun owners.
The issues isn't whether or not you've proposed the 2nd Amendment be repealed but that you are one of those that wants to define sane, sober, and responsible. That way, you can get what you get the same result and can deny you really oppose the 2nd amendment. With what you say you support, you prove you want a certain end result without having to admit that's what you want. It's like Bill Clinton's depends on what the definition of "is" is. It's how Liberals operate.
I don't get to define sober, sane and responsible, that is for a legislature to determine. Is one DUI or two the determining factor of a sober person, is one detained as a danger to himself or others sane or not?
As usual your facts germinate between your ears, where reality never resides.
What makes the legislature experts in those matters? They would be defined using politics not reality.
Seems between your ears is where shit resides.
So we are to allow people not accountable to the people (the NRA) define our laws? You really are dumb.
There are plenty of senators and assembly members who have accepted money from the NRA and are biddable to their desires, but still accountable to the voters.
Funny ain't it, the right wing is all over the CGI but never a word is spoken against the NRA
F'n HYPOCRITES