Eots why did wtc 7 collapse

[daveman]

batteries do not explain and did not did not cause this

why do you keep saying you want to see forensic evidence, then ignore it when it's presented?

you think this is real!! ???

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

You've never seen a large-scale battery bank, have you? Each battery (about the same size of a car battery -- sometimes larger, depending on the application) contains 4.3 mega-joules of energy. That's a lotta energy, equal to about 2 pounds of high explosive.

Then there's the corrosive effects of sulphuric acid on steel. You know about that, right? or are you going to pretend that's fake, too?

 

[eots]

why do you keep saying you want to see forensic evidence, then ignore it when it's presented?

you think this is real!! ???

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

You've never seen a large-scale battery bank, have you? Each battery (about the same size of a car battery -- sometimes larger, depending on the application) contains 4.3 mega-joules of energy. That's a lotta energy, equal to about 2 pounds of high explosive.

Then there's the corrosive effects of sulphuric acid on steel. You know about that, right? or are you going to pretend that's fake, too?

you a really buying this ?...examine the links...and once again it appears the debwunkers reject the NIST report so there seems to unanimous agreement among all that the NIST report is a complete failure

 

[eots]

none of this battery theory is consistent with any of the eyewitness testimony -

 

[KissMy]

why do you keep saying you want to see forensic evidence, then ignore it when it's presented?

you think this is real!! ???

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

You've never seen a large-scale battery bank, have you? Each battery (about the same size of a car battery -- sometimes larger, depending on the application) contains 4.3 mega-joules of energy. That's a lotta energy, equal to about 2 pounds of high explosive.

Then there's the corrosive effects of sulphuric acid on steel. You know about that, right? or are you going to pretend that's fake, too?

A car battery weighs about 35 lbs. Each of these UPS batteries weigh about 200 lbs. They are 6.6 times larger than a car battery. There were over 240 of these per UPS system times 6.6 equals 1,584 car batteries. Now that is a hell of a lot of destructive force. Batteries give off hydrogen & oxygen which are basically rocket fuel & high explosive. Lots of people have had car batteries explode due to these gasses building up in the battery. Each of these battery explosions would be seven times more powerful. Packed tightly in racks many would go off at the same time. When heated or smashed they are more volatile.

 

[Fizz]

LETS HERE FROM SOME MORE MORONS

This Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.
YouTube - Firemen Explosion Testimony

no jackass.... secondary explosions happen all the time and they are NOT proof of explosive demolitions planted in the buildings.

 

[Fizz]

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

and of course not one shred of evidence to back it up!!!

 

[eots]

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

and of course not one shred of evidence to back it up!!!

so you once again call the NIST report into question ...thank you

 

[eots]

you think this is real!! ???

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

You've never seen a large-scale battery bank, have you? Each battery (about the same size of a car battery -- sometimes larger, depending on the application) contains 4.3 mega-joules of energy. That's a lotta energy, equal to about 2 pounds of high explosive.

Then there's the corrosive effects of sulphuric acid on steel. You know about that, right? or are you going to pretend that's fake, too?

A car battery weighs about 35 lbs. Each of these UPS batteries weigh about 200 lbs. They are 6.6 times larger than a car battery. There were over 240 of these per UPS system times 6.6 equals 1,584 car batteries. Now that is a hell of a lot of destructive force. Batteries give off hydrogen & oxygen which are basically rocket fuel & high explosive. Lots of people have had car batteries explode due to these gasses building up in the battery. Each of these battery explosions would be seven times more powerful. Packed tightly in racks many would go off at the same time. When heated or smashed they are more volatile.

a car battery explosion is fuck all I mean it might cost you a eye if you are too close but all in all...fuck all

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6CxVyCzntU&feature=related]YouTube - Car battery explosion[/ame]

 

[eots]

LETS HERE FROM SOME MORE MORONS

This Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.
YouTube - Firemen Explosion Testimony

no jackass.... secondary explosions happen all the time and they are NOT proof of explosive demolitions planted in the buildings.

In the lobbies and basements ??

 

[Fizz]

LETS HERE FROM SOME MORE MORONS

This Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.
YouTube - Firemen Explosion Testimony

no jackass.... secondary explosions happen all the time and they are NOT proof of explosive demolitions planted in the buildings.

In the lobbies and basements ??

Yes.

Please explain how these first responders are still alive if what they witnessed were explosive demolitions going off!!! How did they make it out of the building between the time the explosive demolitions were set off and the building collapse?

You really are fucking stupid!!

 

[eots]

no jackass.... secondary explosions happen all the time and they are NOT proof of explosive demolitions planted in the buildings.

In the lobbies and basements ??

Yes.

Please explain how these first responders are still alive if what they witnessed were explosive demolitions going off!!! How did they make it out of the building between the time the explosive demolitions were set off and the building collapse?

You really are fucking stupid!!

why were the lobbies and basements exploding almost a 80 floors from the fires.. so you say they are lying about huge explosion like bombs going off ?

 

[Fizz]

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

and of course not one shred of evidence to back it up!!!

so you once again call the NIST report into question ...thank you

No jackass. Another fucking stupid assumption by you. You seem completely incapable of not making significant leaps in logic to support you silly claims.

If YOU claim something is fake then YOU need to back it up. It's really quite a simple concept. I don't know why you are having such a hard time understanding it.

Oh wait. Now I remember why you can't understand it. It's because you are a MORON!!

 

[Fizz]

In the lobbies and basements ??

Yes.

Please explain how these first responders are still alive if what they witnessed were explosive demolitions going off!!! How did they make it out of the building between the time the explosive demolitions were set off and the building collapse?

You really are fucking stupid!!

why were the lobbies and basements exploding almost a 80 floors from the fires.. so you say they are lying about huge explosion like bombs going off ?

I can prove there were elevator shafts. Can you prove explosive demolitions?

Again, how the fuck did your witnesses make it out of the building before it collapsed if they were indeed explosive demoliions.

There's a hole in your theory big enough to drive the titanic through.

 

[eots]

Yes.

Please explain how these first responders are still alive if what they witnessed were explosive demolitions going off!!! How did they make it out of the building between the time the explosive demolitions were set off and the building collapse?

You really are fucking stupid!!

why were the lobbies and basements exploding almost a 80 floors from the fires.. so you say they are lying about huge explosion like bombs going off ?

I can prove there were elevator shafts. Can you prove explosive demolitions?

Again, how the fuck did your witnesses make it out of the building before it collapsed if they were indeed explosive demoliions.

There's a hole in your theory big enough to drive the titanic through.

but the fuel was mostly consumed in the initial explosion,the transcripts from the fire fighters inside says they contained most of the fires and elevators still working...why do you think it is necessary for the building to fall with the first explosion ? explosives were planted in 93 why not 2001 ?? why could explosives not of played a role in the collapse ?

 

[Fizz]

why were the lobbies and basements exploding almost a 80 floors from the fires.. so you say they are lying about huge explosion like bombs going off ?

I can prove there were elevator shafts. Can you prove explosive demolitions?

Again, how the fuck did your witnesses make it out of the building before it collapsed if they were indeed explosive demoliions.

There's a hole in your theory big enough to drive the titanic through.

but the fuel was mostly consumed in the initial explosion,the transcripts from the fire fighters inside says they contained most of the fires and elevators still working...why do you think it is necessary for the building to fall with the first explosion ? explosives were planted in 93 why not 2001 ?? why could explosives not of played a role in the collapse ?

Ok. Let me get this straight so we can all have a good laugh at your expense.

You claim either that:

the building demolitions were set off over an extended period of time by design. That demolitions were planted and set off in the basement but the collapse started 80 floors above it.

Or

building demolitions were set off and they had no effect on the building. Then after some time something else started the collapse 80 floors up.

 

[eots]

I can prove there were elevator shafts. Can you prove explosive demolitions?

Again, how the fuck did your witnesses make it out of the building before it collapsed if they were indeed explosive demoliions.

There's a hole in your theory big enough to drive the titanic through.

but the fuel was mostly consumed in the initial explosion,the transcripts from the fire fighters inside says they contained most of the fires and elevators still working...why do you think it is necessary for the building to fall with the first explosion ? explosives were planted in 93 why not 2001 ?? why could explosives not of played a role in the collapse ?

Ok. Let me get this straight so we can all have a good laugh at your expense.

You claim either that:

the building demolitions were set off over an extended period of time by design. That demolitions were planted and set off in the basement but the collapse started 80 floors above it.

Or

building demolitions were set off and they had no effect on the building. Then after some time something else started the collapse 80 floors up.

If fire could bring down the buildings wtc 1-2 and 7...then definitely it is safe to assume a combination of the two would have at minimum the same result if the terrorist did not know the towers would fall they may of wanted to increase the damage and shock value with a repeat performance of 93

 

[KissMy]

Ahh. The ol' "claim it's fake" ploy. Handy, that.

You've never seen a large-scale battery bank, have you? Each battery (about the same size of a car battery -- sometimes larger, depending on the application) contains 4.3 mega-joules of energy. That's a lotta energy, equal to about 2 pounds of high explosive.

Then there's the corrosive effects of sulphuric acid on steel. You know about that, right? or are you going to pretend that's fake, too?

A car battery weighs about 35 lbs. Each of these UPS batteries weigh about 200 lbs. They are 6.6 times larger than a car battery. There were over 240 of these per UPS system times 6.6 equals 1,584 car batteries. Now that is a hell of a lot of destructive force. Batteries give off hydrogen & oxygen which are basically rocket fuel & high explosive. Lots of people have had car batteries explode due to these gasses building up in the battery. Each of these battery explosions would be seven times more powerful. Packed tightly in racks many would go off at the same time. When heated or smashed they are more volatile.

a car battery explosion is fuck all I mean it might cost you a eye if you are too close but all in all...fuck all

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6CxVyCzntU&feature=related]YouTube - Car battery explosion[/ame]

The explosions would have been larger. They will not blow down one of those buildings. They are kept in vented rooms to prevent these gasses from building up & blowing out rooms or floors. The ventilation system was not working after the crash. I am still not saying their explosions brought down buildings but they would account for the blue flashes & explosions saw & heard by whitenesses. The acid is the real destructive force unleashed from at least 25 tons of batteries per building.

 

[Fizz]

If fire could bring down the buildings wtc 1-2 and 7...then definitely it is safe to assume a combination of the two would have at minimum the same result if the terrorist did not know the towers would fall they may of wanted to increase the damage and shock value with a repeat performance of 93

ok. So now you make the retarded claim that terrorists planted explosive demolitions in the towers and when set off they failed to bring the building down.

This leaves us with the fire from the plane crashes bringing the buildings down.

Thanks. You have now officially debunked yourself!!

 

[eots]

If fire could bring down the buildings wtc 1-2 and 7...then definitely it is safe to assume a combination of the two would have at minimum the same result if the terrorist did not know the towers would fall they may of wanted to increase the damage and shock value with a repeat performance of 93

ok. So now you make the retarded claim that terrorists planted explosive demolitions in the towers and when set off they failed to bring the building down.

This leaves us with the fire from the plane crashes bringing the buildings down.

Thanks. You have now officially debunked yourself!!

its not a claim moron..I am putting forth the possibility..all I want is a fact driven investigation by honest people to replace the official cover up story

 

[Fizz]

If fire could bring down the buildings wtc 1-2 and 7...then definitely it is safe to assume a combination of the two would have at minimum the same result if the terrorist did not know the towers would fall they may of wanted to increase the damage and shock value with a repeat performance of 93

ok. So now you make the retarded claim that terrorists planted explosive demolitions in the towers and when set off they failed to bring the building down.

This leaves us with the fire from the plane crashes bringing the buildings down.

Thanks. You have now officially debunked yourself!!

its not a claim moron..I am putting forth the possibility..all I want is a fact driven investigation by honest people to replace the official cover up story

so get off your lazy ass and go investigate....

oh, i'm sorry. you wanted honest people. that leaves most of the twoofers out. should be a really short investigation.