Phactotum
Gold Member
- Jan 18, 2024
- 486
- 314
- 168
- Banned
- #1
Everyone who is honest, knows that the WSJ is clearly a political 'wrag' for those who hate Trump. Rupert Murdoch's son [Lachlan] has long disliked Trump. So, it is a miracle, whenever they publish any info which favors Trump and shames Democrats' lack of integrity regarding Trump.
On February 15th, FOX-News' Bret Baier pointed out... how the WSJ published some words about "ethical ash heap" in terms of what Fani's flagrancies can result in for Trump's path to the White House. So, consider these 2 questions:
Do you think the WSJ hit this one on the head? Do you think the unethical Democrats will stress for WSJ to fire the columnist who published that??
On February 15th, FOX-News' Bret Baier pointed out... how the WSJ published some words about "ethical ash heap" in terms of what Fani's flagrancies can result in for Trump's path to the White House. So, consider these 2 questions:
Do you think the WSJ hit this one on the head? Do you think the unethical Democrats will stress for WSJ to fire the columnist who published that??
Attachments
Last edited: