JBeukema
Rookie
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #181
I did? I thought I rejected your wording of "positive gene therapy" and explained that gene therapy is actual science, so it does not need to be dressed up in pretty words to fool people, unlike eugenics.
I would consider saving women from a breast cancer gene a positive thing wouldn't you?
Spin it, word it however you want the end results are the same. You agree that you would avail yourself of gene therapy if available.
Yes I would, which in no way translates as supporting eugenics in any way, shape, or form.
Except that it is by definition.