yes, that's what it's ALL about.
Ignorant tool.
Is it any part of what it's about? Be specific and tell us, do you expect that others should be forced to pay for you? Yes or no?
I promise that I personally would not receive a single dime. It's not about paying for birth control (although I support it. It's dumbfuckery not to realize that the overall cost of medical care would drop signifigantly.) It's about woman determing for themselves. Not letting a stuffed suit do it.
Talking about strawman!
Tony Campallo (whoever the heck he is) could have used the single and non-offensive word CARE instead of the offensive three words he did use. But why be simple and normal when low-brow and low-IQ do-gooders (who probably have never done a day of volunteer work in their lives) prefer the profane?
BTW, I am an equal opportunity opponent of profanity. I dislike it just as much when used by conservative posters.
He's a Christian speaker. And you just proved his point.
Let me see if I've got this straight...
The people who want to reelect someone who has no plan to fix the economy and a record of abject failure are the smart ones...
...and the people who want to vote for the guy who not only has a plan to fix the economy but also has an incredibly successful track record at fixing broken things are the dummies?
Well all right then!!!
I'm laughing at the following: Has a plan. Successful track record. Fixing things.
Mitt Romney has his five point plan to fix the economy. Barack Obama's only "plan" is raising taxes on rich people which gets his base all fired up but isn't going to do diddly to make the economy grow.
Even Bill Clinton admitted that Mitt's "record" was impressive. Now let's contrast that with the Presidents. What impressive thing has Barry done since leaving Harvard Law School all those years ago?
Mitt Romney was the guy the US turned to in order to save the Salt Lake Olympics. Why? Because he's good at fixing things that are broken. Barry's good at making excuses for why he CAN'T fix things.