Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says

[Ben Thomson]

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says


I wonder if Biden is declaring contributions in kind to the SEC ?

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says

The evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC have been 150 times more negative when covering President Trump compared to presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to a new study.

www.foxnews.com

So trying to report on and trying to make sense out of Trump's off the wall tweets is being negative towards him?

 

[bripat9643]

So that is an excuse for the media to be biased? You do understand a fair and free press is essential for this nation to survive right?

The Constitution only specifies a Free Press ... and they are free to be bias ... and indeed all media is ... can't find a TV station that'll tell you what you want to hear? ...

The Foudning fathers never imagined that the press would become corrupt by having all its employees indoctrinated in government run brainwashing mills.

 

[BluesLegend]

LOL look no sane person watches MSNBC or CNN so what's the real ratio?

 

[BluesLegend]

So that is an excuse for the media to be biased? You do understand a fair and free press is essential for this nation to survive right?

The Constitution only specifies a Free Press ... and they are free to be bias ... and indeed all media is ... can't find a TV station that'll tell you what you want to hear? ...

The Foudning fathers never imagined that the press would become corrupt by having all its employees indoctrinated in government run brainwashing mills.

In thousands of years of human history what fate eventually befalls lowlife scum like the left?

 

[harmonica]

of course it is AND to white people

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says


I wonder if Biden is declaring contributions in kind to the SEC ?

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says

The evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC have been 150 times more negative when covering President Trump compared to presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to a new study.

www.foxnews.com

Another crybaby conservative group. Hey whiners...he is the sitting president. And a historically stupid and unethical president.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

So that is an excuse for the media to be biased? You do understand a fair and free press is essential for this nation to survive right?

The Constitution only specifies a Free Press ... and they are free to be bias ... and indeed all media is ... can't find a TV station that'll tell you what you want to hear? ...

I didn't mention the constitution but thanks for tell us what we already knew. Do you think a media that distorts or omits the truth is good for the country?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says


I wonder if Biden is declaring contributions in kind to the SEC ?

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says

The evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC have been 150 times more negative when covering President Trump compared to presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to a new study.

www.foxnews.com

So trying to report on and trying to make sense out of Trump's off the wall tweets is being negative towards him?

Nope. It's fine. Do the same with the dems.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you think a media that distorts or omits the truth is good for the country?

But enough about Fox, Sinclair, Rush, Hannity....

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Do you think a media that distorts or omits the truth is good for the country?

But enough about Fox, Sinclair, Rush, Hannity....

Yet you still believe there's proof the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you think a media that distorts or omits the truth is good for the country?

But enough about Fox, Sinclair, Rush, Hannity....

Yet you still believe there's proof the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

 

[lennypartiv]

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

Have you guys found the pee tape yet?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

Have you guys found the pee tape yet?

Nope! It will appear when Trump stops licking Putin's boots.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

Have you guys found the pee tape yet?

Nope! It will appear when Trump stops licking Putin's boots.

You have to be suffering severe brain damage to believe Trump is licking Putin's boots.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

Have you guys found the pee tape yet?

Nope! It will appear when Trump stops licking Putin's boots.

You have to be suffering severe brain damage to believe Trump is licking Putin's boots.

Said the devoted cultist. Not compelling.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course there is. Russia helped them. they accepted and encouraged the help. They passed internal, secret campaign data to the Russians, to help them help. All facts. These facts are why you have gotten yourself banned so many times, with your embarrassing hissy fits.

Have you guys found the pee tape yet?

Nope! It will appear when Trump stops licking Putin's boots.

You have to be suffering severe brain damage to believe Trump is licking Putin's boots.

Said the devoted cultist. Not compelling.

You believe your delusions are compelling?

 

[Mytwocents]

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says


I wonder if Biden is declaring contributions in kind to the SEC ?

Evening newscasts 150 times more negative toward Trump than Biden, study says

The evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC have been 150 times more negative when covering President Trump compared to presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to a new study.

www.foxnews.com

File this story under the heading 'DUH, NO SHIT'.

No longer trying to hide who they really are, the cockroaches are 300% more 'all-in' in lying to American and ding everything they can to affect the election outcome.

Notice who the culprits are.....there ya go - you now know who the enemies of the US / the Constitution / journalistic integrity/ truth are.

The MSM have been talking negative about Trump, way before he took office, and every day he has been in office. This isn't news...

Not before he started running for President. Then he was their best buddy.

Exactly. When he announced he was running for President, they all crapped a brick, then mocked him through the entire process. It was interesting to watch the celebrities "swear" they would move to Canada or elsewhere if he won the election. I haven't heard of a single one that has made good on that promise, have you? I honestly was rooting for Rand Paul, who had to go Republican, but regardless, there was NO WAY I was voting for Hillary Clinton. A scorned woman is the LAST person anyone needs in office...

 

[BULLDOG]

Please explain why every Republican president gets way more negative coverage than dems? We know, they're all Hitler right?

No Only Hitler was Hitler. Right wing presidential candidates are just idiot ass holes.

So that is an excuse for the media to be biased? You do understand a fair and free press is essential for this nation to survive right?

You would expect the media to be a cheer leader for idiot ass holes? Do you expect them to NOT report the idiot remarks and actions from that right wing ass hole?

 

[DGS49]

obviously, books could be written on this subject, and they have been. But the overt reporting is not even half of it. Check the presentation of the stories...statements like, "President Trump stated, without evidence..."

This is bullshit. It is UP TO THE REPORTER to ascertain the basis of the President's statement. He rarely says anything without some basis, but the reporters personally disagree with him, so rather than do their fucking homework they just say trump had no justification, or evidence, or basis for what he says.

 

[lennypartiv]

Said the devoted cultist. Not compelling.

Better a cultist than a socialist.