JimH52
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2007
- 47,195
- 25,375
Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Every media outlet the Comrade banned is chasing Russian collusion stories
He didn't ban nor silence anyone. Why are you such a gullible nitwit?He is scared of something! So ban them and silence them at every turn!
You mean fake news outlet? Or very fake news outlet?Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Amen! That is the great benefit from Trump's suppression of mainstream media. He will likely live to regret it.
You mean fake news outlet? Or very fake news outlet?Every outlet WH banned from press briefing is chasing stories on Trump’s Russia ties
Pay back is going to be B*tch, Comrade.
Every media outlet the Comrade banned is chasing Russian collusion stories
That there is plausible plausible reality to the assertion that a POTUS or key member(s) of his team/Administration for political or personal gain colluded with anyone, but especially a foreign state and key leaders of it, is a serious enough matter that all media should be chasing that story.
I don't know what the FBI or press will find. I can wait to find out. Also, I think every American deserves to know the details of what the FBI and Congressional investigations find.
Frankly, just as I think prior federal officials (Clinton, Reagan, Bush II, and H. Clinton, to name a few) could have and should have been more timely and candid about the nature of their involvement in a host of things -- nothing good for the country is served by dragging this stuff out and keeping it hidden for as long as possible -- I think the current administration needs to, for the benefit of all future similar situations and generations, set a precedent and just come clean, provide demonstrative evidence of the veracity of their assertions and let the chips land where they land.
I think Clinton should have done that with "email-gate." I think Bush II should have done that with Iraq War Redux. I think Reagan should have done it with Iran-Contra, and I think Clinton should have done it for sure with "Oral in the Oval." In fact, of all those things, "Oral" should never have been allowed to be a "thing" because there's really nothing that is anybody's (other than him, her and his spouse) business about the POTUS getting blown in the Oval.
Are you referring to Obama (pickaninny-of-the-US) or B. Clinton (philanderer-of-the-US)? Both, perhaps?Every media outlet the Comrade banned is chasing Russian collusion stories
That there is plausible plausible reality to the assertion that a POTUS or key member(s) of his team/Administration for political or personal gain colluded with anyone, but especially a foreign state and key leaders of it, is a serious enough matter that all media should be chasing that story.
I don't know what the FBI or press will find. I can wait to find out. Also, I think every American deserves to know the details of what the FBI and Congressional investigations find.
Frankly, just as I think prior federal officials (Clinton, Reagan, Bush II, and H. Clinton, to name a few) could have and should have been more timely and candid about the nature of their involvement in a host of things -- nothing good for the country is served by dragging this stuff out and keeping it hidden for as long as possible -- I think the current administration needs to, for the benefit of all future similar situations and generations, set a precedent and just come clean, provide demonstrative evidence of the veracity of their assertions and let the chips land where they land.
I think Clinton should have done that with "email-gate." I think Bush II should have done that with Iraq War Redux. I think Reagan should have done it with Iran-Contra, and I think Clinton should have done it for sure with "Oral in the Oval." In fact, of all those things, "Oral" should never have been allowed to be a "thing" because there's really nothing that is anybody's (other than him, her and his spouse) business about the POTUS getting blown in the Oval.
You realize the narcsist, sociopath, orange idiot will never admit anything. And his adoring, mindless, cult will never admit he has ever lied, colluded with Russia, or grabbed pus*y....as they drool over His Holiness.
Every media outlet the Comrade banned is chasing Russian collusion stories
That there is plausible plausible reality to the assertion that a POTUS or key member(s) of his team/Administration for political or personal gain colluded with anyone, but especially a foreign state and key leaders of it, is a serious enough matter that all media should be chasing that story.
I don't know what the FBI or press will find. I can wait to find out. Also, I think every American deserves to know the details of what the FBI and Congressional investigations find.
Frankly, just as I think prior federal officials (Clinton, Reagan, Bush II, and H. Clinton, to name a few) could have and should have been more timely and candid about the nature of their involvement in a host of things -- nothing good for the country is served by dragging this stuff out and keeping it hidden for as long as possible -- I think the current administration needs to, for the benefit of all future similar situations and generations, set a precedent and just come clean, provide demonstrative evidence of the veracity of their assertions and let the chips land where they land.
I think Clinton should have done that with "email-gate." I think Bush II should have done that with Iraq War Redux. I think Reagan should have done it with Iran-Contra, and I think Clinton should have done it for sure with "Oral in the Oval." In fact, of all those things, "Oral" should never have been allowed to be a "thing" because there's really nothing that is anybody's (other than him, her and his spouse) business about the POTUS getting blown in the Oval.
You realize the narcsist, sociopath, orange idiot will never admit anything. And his adoring, mindless, cult will never admit he has ever lied, colluded with Russia, or grabbed pus*y....as they drool over His Holiness.