Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, that is the non sequitur (not that you have any idea what that is) you just invented to soothe yourself, because you know less than nothing about any of this and have no tools in your toolbox to make any valid points. You probably should not even be commenting in the science section of the board at all.I see your logic...
If it's on the web and it agrees with you, it's good.
If it's on the web and it doesn't agree with you, it's stupid.
You're trying to crawl your way out of a hole.All the videos I found were by non-scientists so I think you've already cherry picked. Would you respect the views on religion of an atheist?
It's way older than 6,000 I have no doubt.C-14 is only good for 50,000 years so are you saying we live on a young Earth?
Not sure what that means? It gives a range of time before the present that tracks to a specific span of years.It doesn't track back to calendar years either.
That 'bullshit' is called physics. There are several methods to determine half-life, you don't have to wait 5,000 years to measure it.I searched for Carbon Dating and everyone of them explained that the half-life of Carbon-144 is over 5,000 years.
What kind of bullshit is that?
It isn't just one thing that is responsible for the difference in skin shades among humans.Inuits’ vitamin D intake wasn’t dependent upon the sun. They get all that they need from their diet, heavy on types of fatty fish that are naturally rich in vitamin D.
2 to 3 hundred thousands years isn't a long time when you consider the earth is over 4 billion years oldAnother reason is that we just have not been around very long.
About how old? Or how young?It's way older than 6,000 I have no doubt.
Not sure what that means? It gives a range of time before the present that tracks to a specific span of years.
It makes the same assumptions as all sciences make: the physical laws we observe today are the same laws that existed from the beginning. If your God changed these laws in the past, radiometric dating would be useless. Fortunately there is no evidence (outside of religions) that this has happened.About how old? Or how young?
Radiometric dating has assumptions that no one can know. Do you need to know what they are (meaning you don't know radiometric dating)?
Yep. And what is that...maybe 10,000 generations?2 to 3 hundred thousands years isn't a long time when you consider the earth is over 4 billion years old
Wow... Have you published your work on this? Scientists arent sure this was the case...but surely you could convince them with your research.As I understand it at first there was absolutely nothing.
About how old? Or how young?
Radiometric dating has assumptions that no one can know. Do you need to know what they are (meaning you don't know radiometric dating)?
The Science of Chemistry....That 'bullshit' is called physics. There are several methods to determine half-life, you don't have to wait 5,000 years to measure it.
That's the dumbest thing i have ever read. That's as objective as objective gets.Medications...
They are the result of science!
But they come with 1,000 warnings that will kill you or cause permanent disabilities.
Yep! That's science!
Because the results of Organic Chemistry are subjective
That's because you're an idiot with an agenda.That's the dumbest thing i have ever read. That's as objective as objective gets.
I sure did. I directly addressed your very stupid and wrong comments about medicine and organic chemistry. The scientific process of analyzing the benefits and side effects of medicine is as objective as objective gets. Modern scientific medicine is one of the top triumphs of the human race. Precisely because of the objectivity of scientific process.That's because you're an idiot with an agenda.
I see you didn't address any of my specific points because you would never have an erection ever again.
You're a fucking idiot who obviously doesn't listen to commercials or pay attention to the forms you have to sign before a medical procedure and you obviously have never met a chemist or physicist who actually worked for a drug company, so stuff your idiocy up your ass.I sure did. I directly addressed your very stupid and wrong comments about medicine and organic chemistry. The scientific process of analyzing the benefits and side effects of medicine is as objective as objective gets. Modern scientific medicine is one of the top triumphs of the human race. Precisely because of the objectivity of scientific process.
None of that argues the science is objective. What are you smokin', old man?You're a fucking idiot who obviously doesn't listen to commercials or pay attention to the forms you have to sign before a medical procedure and you obviously have never met a chemist or physicist who actually worked for a drug company, so stuff your idiocy up your ass.
objective as it gets
Do you know what a lethal % is that prevent a medication or procedure from reaching market?
I bet you don't.
Answer right now so we'll all know you know nothing.
The definition of Objective in the medical world is >50% of people don't get ill or die.None of that argues the science is objective. What are you smokin', old man?
