Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's really odd that the radical left doesn't understand how bi-polar they have become. Everyone credits Obama for the stock market gaining about 100 points but the gain was the result of more corporate wealth but the left hates corporate wealth but they want to credit the president with economic recovery.
So the rich don't pay taxes anyway so the solution is to give them MORE money?
If by 'give them MORE money,' you are suggesting, 'lowering their taxes,' then sure. Rich people -- despite all this jive about wanting to pay more -- do not enjoy paying more taxes, because they understand that they will have to spend extra money to avoid them. I guess this is the progressive way of 'sticking it to the rich' by making sure the rich have an extra tough time avoiding taxes.
They're not keeping their money here. Have you seen your financial account?
Oh my, someone doesn't understand how publicly-traded companies work...
Complex problems mean complex solutions. Simple knee jerk solutions that fail come from simple minded jerks.
What exactly are you 'complex' solutions? I really would like to know...
Why do you think they want a tax holiday to bring it back into the country? Remember the last time that happened under Bush? They didn't create jobs. They used the money to move more jobs to China.
Clearly, you don't understand "complex". I think it's past your bedtime.
PCH is a beautiful road.Guess I must have taken the scenic route then. Wondering why the trip took so long.
Fund science, tech and infrastructure
The goal should be for corporation to innovate and grow jobs, but also for the government to invest into infrastructure + R @ D. Anyone that wants a pure capitalist or socialist system doesn't know what they're talking about.
I think going after personal wealth=ok
Going after corporation=bad
As corporations use that money to hire people and expand. Maybe the democrats aren't totally wrong with raising taxes on people making more then 500k per year??? It isn't so good to expect people making less then 30k per year as we generally want them to increase their wealth to go from the lower to middle classes.
Don't corporations use the same services that we do?
They most likely pay more for those services than you do.
And they pay taxes you don't
Meanwhile, Obamacare prevents any hiring, because insurance premiums are set to double....
Of which 100% is subsidized.
Who the fuck you think subsidizes it?
Of which 100% is subsidized.
We've seen your interpretation of subsidies.
Don't you have some money to go spend?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidy
Fund science, tech and infrastructure
The goal should be for corporation to innovate and grow jobs, but also for the government to invest into infrastructure + R @ D. Anyone that wants a pure capitalist or socialist system doesn't know what they're talking about.
I think going after personal wealth=ok
Going after corporation=bad
As corporations use that money to hire people and expand. Maybe the democrats aren't totally wrong with raising taxes on people making more then 500k per year??? It isn't so good to expect people making less then 30k per year as we generally want them to increase their wealth to go from the lower to middle classes.
Don't corporations use the same services that we do?
You didn't build that!
Also, you're a retread.
US effective corporate tax rate is 12%, dupes...LOL!
That is just the average rate. Complied, most corporations pay above 20%.
It's really odd that the radical left doesn't understand how bi-polar they have become. Everyone credits Obama for the stock market gaining about 100 points but the gain was the result of more corporate wealth but the left hates corporate wealth but they want to credit the president with economic recovery.
It's not corporate wealth. it's corporate "take over".
Beside, you're not rich. And what if the government stopped your disability? You couldn't even come on this board and applaud corporations. You would have to do that from a piano box. Cramped, but not without a certain "style".
It's really odd that the radical left doesn't understand how bi-polar they have become. Everyone credits Obama for the stock market gaining about 100 points but the gain was the result of more corporate wealth but the left hates corporate wealth but they want to credit the president with economic recovery.
It's not corporate wealth. it's corporate "take over".
Beside, you're not rich. And what if the government stopped your disability? You couldn't even come on this board and applaud corporations. You would have to do that from a piano box. Cramped, but not without a certain "style".
Dean, you're not making any sense at all.
It's not corporate wealth. it's corporate "take over".
Beside, you're not rich. And what if the government stopped your disability? You couldn't even come on this board and applaud corporations. You would have to do that from a piano box. Cramped, but not without a certain "style".
Dean, you're not making any sense at all.
You just now noticed?
It's really odd that the radical left doesn't understand how bi-polar they have become. Everyone credits Obama for the stock market gaining about 100 points but the gain was the result of more corporate wealth but the left hates corporate wealth but they want to credit the president with economic recovery.
It's not corporate wealth. it's corporate "take over".
Beside, you're not rich. And what if the government stopped your disability? You couldn't even come on this board and applaud corporations. You would have to do that from a piano box. Cramped, but not without a certain "style".
Dean, you're not making any sense at all.
We've seen your interpretation of subsidies.
Don't you have some money to go spend?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidy
Wikipedia is the cyber-encyclopedia of flunkies.
But for shits and schoolyard giggles... let's go with it.
The most common definition of a subsidy refers to a payment made by the government to a producer.
In this context, name a subsidy as so granted to the oil and gas industries.
And if you would please, in the same context, name the subsidies that empowered you to amass $165 million.
Don't corporations use the same services that we do?
They most likely pay more for those services than you do.
And they pay taxes you don't
Sure, and they write-off the cost.
What taxes related to income do corporations pay that 'you'-'I'-'we' don't?
They most likely pay more for those services than you do.
And they pay taxes you don't
Sure, and they write-off the cost.
What taxes related to income do corporations pay that 'you'-'I'-'we' don't?
You do realize that shipping companies pay higher tolls and per mileage federal and state fees don't you?
As Corp I pay much higher property taxes than you. I get taxed annually on my cleaning supplies, every chair, computer phone coffee maker etc that I have in my business and let's not forget workers' comp which is nothing but a tax that goes up every year even if you never had a claim
Every single permit, license etc I need is nothing but a tax
So maybe you should learn a little bit about running a business before you flap your gums.
And as I said before, no private business has an obligation to spend its money or to hire people.
Sure, and they write-off the cost.
What taxes related to income do corporations pay that 'you'-'I'-'we' don't?
You do realize that shipping companies pay higher tolls and per mileage federal and state fees don't you?
As Corp I pay much higher property taxes than you. I get taxed annually on my cleaning supplies, every chair, computer phone coffee maker etc that I have in my business and let's not forget workers' comp which is nothing but a tax that goes up every year even if you never had a claim
Every single permit, license etc I need is nothing but a tax
So maybe you should learn a little bit about running a business before you flap your gums.
And as I said before, no private business has an obligation to spend its money or to hire people.
I can tell that it really is bad for you when a shipping company (that makes it's money shipping goods) pays more transportation tax for the private use of the roadways and rail lines.
I mean why wouldn't they be required to pay more? They tear up the roads. They make good profit. And they really need decent roads and rail lines.
And I figure that you must be paying all those fees and taxes you complained about to run your company.
And I even know why you complain and yet still keep paying those fees and taxes and maybe even hiring someone.
It's because you are still making money. So how bad can it really be?
And I hire the exact amount of people I need to run my business. Just because I might be sitting on some cash is no reason to spend it buying shit I don't need or hiring extra people that will not increase my profit.
It's not corporate wealth. it's corporate "take over".
Beside, you're not rich. And what if the government stopped your disability? You couldn't even come on this board and applaud corporations. You would have to do that from a piano box. Cramped, but not without a certain "style".
Dean, you're not making any sense at all.
Too many Republicans on this board feel they are on the side of millionaires because they too, are millionaires. Simply "millionaires without funds", but they are firmly convinced that one day, their ship will come in. So they are actually protecting what they imagine to be their future wealth. They call it "imagination". I know it to be "delusion".
I'll give you my solutions:Not surprised you forgot all about me and my request to hear your 'complex solution.' Good thing I didn't allow you to waste my time.
