Evil...

[Rustic]

Anyone for this needs to burn in hell...

$1,000 Gun Tax Pushed as “Role Model” for States

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Actually, gun owners should just be made to carry liability insurance.

And yeah, the tax is good too.

 

[koshergrl]

Anyone for this needs to burn in hell...

$1,000 Gun Tax Pushed as “Role Model” for States

Oh, they probably will...

How the Nazis Used Gun Control

 

[koshergrl]

"In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm, and attack political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches for and seizures of guns and dissident publications ensued. Police revoked gun licenses of Social Democrats and others who were not “politically reliable.”
Read more at: How the Nazis Used Gun Control

 

[Snouter]

Hasn't that jews not having guns theory been debunked? In fact in the slave labor camps they made ammo didn't they?

 

[ChrisL]

Anyone for this needs to burn in hell...

$1,000 Gun Tax Pushed as “Role Model” for States

That should be unconstitutional. Hopefully, if it ever becomes a "law", it will be challenged.

 

[koshergrl]

Hasn't that jews not having guns theory been debunked? In fact in the slave labor camps they made ammo didn't they?

Er..no. It hasn't. But the Nazi gun control totalitarian pukes like to pretend it has been.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Actually, gun owners should just be made to carry liability insurance.

And yeah, the tax is good too.

Most of us do have liability insurance.

 

[koshergrl]

"
My name is Manuel Martinez. Born in Cuba. American Citizen for more than 40 years. I oppose any manipulation, any regulation or disruption of the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States."

"In 1959 a Revolution … individuals … malicious individuals, masquerading as Democrats, revolutionaries, established a regime … a dictatorial regime … in my nation. Called Communism, Socialism, Stalinism, Marxism, and whatever other named -ism you want to put on it. The reason why it was done was to take away the guns from the People."

Communism Survivor Blasts Gun Control: "You Don't Know What Freedom Is" | RealClearPolitics

 

[koshergrl]

"... if we keep tangling with the Second Amendment, we are open the same way that Cuba was open for Communism. China, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Venezuela, on and on. A dictatorial regime that will destroy this country, in the same way that it destroyed those ones that I mentioned to you.
"Gun Control does not protect anybody. It doesn’t protect the citizens, it doesn’t protect the People. The only reason for gun control is for the Government to be protected from the Citizens. In that way the Government can manipulate the People and subjugate them. That’s what’s happened in Cuba for 52 years"

Communism Survivor Blasts Gun Control: "You Don't Know What Freedom Is" | RealClearPolitics

 

[midcan5]

Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is imaginary and thus the gun huggers love of the source of their guts, like a child with its blankee.

Not a bad idea actually, consider for a minute the state and government expenditures for gun related nonsense? The children still alive. We live in a dumb nation and having guns everywhere is more proof. Every day another unnecessary death - and the same dipshits cry over abortion. Pro life only counts if nothing is required of the phonies.

"Keeping a gun in the home carries a murder risk 2.7 times greater than not keeping one, according to a study by Arthur Kellermann. The National Rifle Association has fiercely attacked this study, but it remains valid despite its criticisms. The study found that people are 21 times more likely to be killed by someone they know than a stranger breaking into the house. Half of the murders were over arguments or romantic triangles. The study also found that the increased murder rate in gun-owning households was entirely due to an increase in gun homicides only, not any other murder method. It further found that gun-owning households saw an increased murder risk by family or intimate acquaintances, not by strangers or non-intimate acquaintances. The most straightforward explanation is that the presence of a gun increases the possibility that a normal family fight or drinking binge will become deadly. No other explanation fits the above facts." A gun in the home increases personal safety

"In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word 'fraud'--on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." In a speech in 1992, Burger declared that "the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to have firearms at all. "In his view, the purpose of the Second Amendment was "to ensure that the 'state armies'--'the militia'--would be maintained for the defense of the state."

 

[JakeStarkey]

Simply require a reasonable fee for a hefty insurance bond to facilitate responsible use of firearms.

 

[koshergrl]

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”
- Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6, 1938

 

[guno]

Anyone for this needs to burn in hell...

$1,000 Gun Tax Pushed as “Role Model” for States

Anyone for this needs to burn in hell.

oh no!!! another goyim fantasy of the christer hell!!

 

[koshergrl]

Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is imaginary and thus the gun huggers love of the source of their guts, like a child with its blankee.

Not a bad idea actually, consider for a minute the state and government expenditures for gun related nonsense? The children still alive. We live in a dumb nation and having guns everywhere is more proof. Every day another unnecessary death - and the same dipshits cry over abortion. Pro life only counts if nothing is required of the phonies.

"Keeping a gun in the home carries a murder risk 2.7 times greater than not keeping one, according to a study by Arthur Kellermann. The National Rifle Association has fiercely attacked this study, but it remains valid despite its criticisms. The study found that people are 21 times more likely to be killed by someone they know than a stranger breaking into the house. Half of the murders were over arguments or romantic triangles. The study also found that the increased murder rate in gun-owning households was entirely due to an increase in gun homicides only, not any other murder method. It further found that gun-owning households saw an increased murder risk by family or intimate acquaintances, not by strangers or non-intimate acquaintances. The most straightforward explanation is that the presence of a gun increases the possibility that a normal family fight or drinking binge will become deadly. No other explanation fits the above facts." A gun in the home increases personal safety

"In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word 'fraud'--on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." In a speech in 1992, Burger declared that "the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to have firearms at all. "In his view, the purpose of the Second Amendment was "to ensure that the 'state armies'--'the militia'--would be maintained for the defense of the state."

So get rid of your guns, loser. Nobody is stopping you.

 

[koshergrl]

Simply require a reasonable fee for a hefty insurance bond to facilitate responsible use of firearms.

Meh. Unconstitutional.

But you wouldn't know about that.

 

[Katzndogz]

I have gun. If someone breaks in their risk is 100% that they will be blown to kingdom come.

 

[koshergrl]

"Firearms were allowed to remain in the hands of Soviet citizens until 1929, when private gun ownership was abolished - a time which saw the rise of one of the world's most repressive regimes, that was led by Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin (he ruled from 1941-1953 but was entrenched in the country's leadership by 1928)."

""In 1932-33, Stalin engineered a famine (by massively raising the grain quota that the peasantry had to turn over to the state); this killed between six and seven million people and broke the back of Ukrainian resistance," says a history of his political career at Gendercide.org. "The Five-Year Plans for industry, too, were implemented in an extraordinarily brutal fashion, leading to the deaths of millions of convict laborers, overwhelmingly men.

His "callous disregard for life" was matched only by his paranoia; later, he purged the Communist Party itself of anyone and everyone he believed was a threat - all under the auspices of a total gun ban.

"If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves," he once said.


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039264_gun_control_timeline_true_history.html#ixzz46DMmC7IX

 

[koshergrl]

"The Ottoman Empire, the origins of which were in Turkey, implemented full gun control in 1911. A few years later, beginning in 1915 and lasting until 1917, some 1.5 million Armenians (out of a total of 2.5 million) living within the empire were rounded up and murdered by the "Young Turks" of the ruling class. In what has since been called the Armenian Holocaust, "Armenians all over the world commemorate this great tragedy on April 24, because it was on that day in 1915 when 300 Armenian leaders, writers, thinkers and professionals in Constantinople (present day Istanbul) were rounded up, deported and killed," says a short history of the slaughter by the University of Michigan. "Also on that day in Constantinople, 5,000 of the poorest Armenians were butchered in the streets and in their homes."

"The Ottoman government established "butcher battalions" which consisted primarily of violent criminals who had been released from prison just to kill ethnic Armenians. Those who were members of the army (which was currently fighting the Allies in World War I) "were disarmed, placed into labor battalions, and then killed," said the university history."


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039264_gun_control_timeline_true_history.html#ixzz46DN9EaRL

 

[Hossfly]

Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is imaginary and thus the gun huggers love of the source of their guts, like a child with its blankee.

Not a bad idea actually, consider for a minute the state and government expenditures for gun related nonsense? The children still alive. We live in a dumb nation and having guns everywhere is more proof. Every day another unnecessary death - and the same dipshits cry over abortion. Pro life only counts if nothing is required of the phonies.

"Keeping a gun in the home carries a murder risk 2.7 times greater than not keeping one, according to a study by Arthur Kellermann. The National Rifle Association has fiercely attacked this study, but it remains valid despite its criticisms. The study found that people are 21 times more likely to be killed by someone they know than a stranger breaking into the house. Half of the murders were over arguments or romantic triangles. The study also found that the increased murder rate in gun-owning households was entirely due to an increase in gun homicides only, not any other murder method. It further found that gun-owning households saw an increased murder risk by family or intimate acquaintances, not by strangers or non-intimate acquaintances. The most straightforward explanation is that the presence of a gun increases the possibility that a normal family fight or drinking binge will become deadly. No other explanation fits the above facts." A gun in the home increases personal safety

"In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word 'fraud'--on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." In a speech in 1992, Burger declared that "the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to have firearms at all. "In his view, the purpose of the Second Amendment was "to ensure that the 'state armies'--'the militia'--would be maintained for the defense of the state."

Now I know I'm right when I say there should be a bounty on Left Wing Progressive Liberal Communist Pukes.