Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What the fuck do you mean "unlike you". I provided a link you facile twit.
You stupid fucking idiot. Look at the horizontal axes on your graphs.
The C in CAGW disappears with <2C. Nothing they claimed is happening.
What the fuck do you mean "unlike you". I provided a link you facile twit.
You stupid fucking idiot. Look at the horizontal axes on your brightness graphs. And what do you think is demonstrated by your Vostok data? That you don't know what the flying fuck you're talking about? Right.
The C in CAGW disappears with <2C. Nothing they claimed is happening.
Actually, it disappears if you leave the WUWT website. Use of that strange term is an identifying trait of the WUWT cultists. That's why I recommend people should stop using the term. It instantly identifies the speaker as a WUWT cultist, and thus instantly destroys all of the speaker's credibility.
What the fuck do you mean "unlike you". I provided a link you facile twit.
You stupid fucking idiot. Look at the horizontal axes on your graphs.
I believe that you believe you did. You have posted plenty of stuff that has been summarily debunked...but nothing that is evidence of anything that you claim. All you manage to show when you post what you believe to be evidence is how easily you are scammed.
Why not post that claimed link again and we can tear it down all over again for you. Or do you prefer to withhold that information since all we want to do is find some problem with it?
There were no satellite data backing up the claim the liar "Crick" made up yet again. All it boils down to is another "revised" estimate to get the egg of Hansen`s face, he concluded that it`s better to blame it on aerosols rather than the other dog that ate the homework the other climate gurus did on how the missing heat is hiding way below the depths surveyed by the Argos System:Hansen's team concluded that Earth has absorbed more than half a Watt more solar energy per square meter than it let off throughout the six year study period. The calculated value of the imbalance (0.58 Watts of excess energy per square meter) is more than twice as much as the reduction in the amount of solar energy supplied to the planet between maximum and minimum solar activity (0.25 Watts per square meter).Climate scientists have been refining calculations of the Earth's energy imbalance for many years, but this newest estimate is an improvement over previous attempts because the scientists had access to better measurements of ocean temperature than researchers have had in the past.
The end result is just another estimate and the impact on climate is "quite uncertain".Aerosols, which can either warm or cool the atmosphere depending on their composition and how they interact with clouds, are thought to have a net cooling effect. But estimates of their overall impact on climate are quite uncertain given how difficult it is to measure the distribution of the particles on a broad scale. The new study suggests that the overall cooling effect from aerosols could be about twice as strong as current climate models suggest, largely because few models account for how the particles affect clouds.
Really? How could they have done that. It says on the same web page:Crick post #22
Could you explain, then, why satellites have consistently measured a continuing increase in the imbalance of radiation at the top of the atmosphere over this same period? Satellites have found more radiative energy entering the Earth's atmosphere than leaving it
And also according to Hansen if you don`t have accurate satellite data for aerosols then you are in limbo as far as the energy budget is concerned."Unfortunately, aerosols remain poorly measured from space," said Michael Mishchenko, a scientist also based at GISS and the project scientist for Glory, a satellite mission designed to measure aerosols in unprecedented detail that was lost after a launch failure in early 2011. "We must have a much better understanding of the global distribution of detailed aerosol properties in order to perfect calculations of Earth's energy imbalance," said Mishchenko.
and performs a circular "proof" that the missing heat is in the ocean after all.
Really? How could they have done that.
and performs a circular "proof" that the missing heat is in the ocean after all.
Since the Argo floats directly measured the heat increase, it's very peculiar to see you claim circular reasoning. Direct evidence such as those measurements would definitely not be circular.
By measuring the outgoing longwave radiation coming out of the atmosphere.Really? How could they have done that.
You made a logic error by equating "aerosols are poorly measured" to "OLR is poorly measured".
and performs a circular "proof" that the missing heat is in the ocean after all.
Since the Argo floats directly measured the heat increase, it's very peculiar to see you claim circular reasoning. Direct evidence such as those measurements would definitely not be circular.
By measuring the outgoing longwave radiation coming out of the atmosphere.Really? How could they have done that.
You made a logic error by equating "aerosols are poorly measured" to "OLR is poorly measured".
Gore Rule invoked. Whoever brings up Gore first forfeits the thread for their side.
That paper by Hansen which your buddy crooked Crick waved around as satellite data does not have any satellite data.
And the missing heat has not been found with the Argos network.
Gore Rule invoked. Whoever brings up Gore first forfeits the thread for their side.
No one gives a flying fuck about your made up, self-serving rule.
Gore Rule invoked. Whoever brings up Gore first forfeits the thread for their side.
No one gives a flying fuck about your made up, self-serving rule.
People who can talk about science, do.
Little bitches who can't talk about science whine about Gore.
You, Bri, are the one that even the other little bitches refer to as a little bitch.
You, Bri, are the one that even the other little bitches refer to as a little bitch.
My link is about ten inches up your screen. If you can't find it, you're beyond my help. Unlike your link, it goes somewhere. Yours just goes to another post where we see data with NO source identification, with brightness plotted against wave number and I know you haven't the faintest fuck of an idea what a wavenumber is. I don't even think you'll know what it is after you look it up. But if you do figure it out, see if you can tell us what it is precisely that you've displayed with those graphs, cause it isn't what you think it is.
What the fuck do you mean "unlike you". I provided a link you facile twit.
You stupid fucking idiot. Look at the horizontal axes on your brightness graphs. And what do you think is demonstrated by your Vostok data? That you don't know what the flying fuck you're talking about? Right.
That post is just full of class. Don't you feel like a man now? hahahahaahahahhahaha. Fail!
Gore Rule invoked. Whoever brings up Gore first forfeits the thread for their side.
