Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
It is not looking good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's just a megalomaniac, digging a deeper and deeper hole for himself. If and when the US and the West decide to take action, it will be swift and decisive.
A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
Of course you lefties believe America is more dangerous. You lefties and ISIS are comrades when it comes to hate.A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
Meh, I'm more worried about Trump having nukes than the little potbellied dictator...
Of course you lefties believe America is more dangerous. You lefties and ISIS are comrades when it comes to hate.
Tell me again who gives a crap about what 5 counties in KKKalifornia think?Of course you lefties believe America is more dangerous. You lefties and ISIS are comrades when it comes to hate.
Trump isn't America. America said no to Trump. By about 3 million votes.
The U.S. and South Korea are in a pretty shitty spot. Of course defeating North Korea in the end would be a cakewalk, but not before South Korea is devastated. And that's just by conventional artillery. It looks like our best bet at this point is containment, and hopes that Kim is assassinated by one of his own.
The U.S. and South Korea are in a pretty shitty spot. Of course defeating North Korea in the end would be a cakewalk, but not before South Korea is devastated. And that's just by conventional artillery. It looks like our best bet at this point is containment, and hopes that Kim is assassinated by one of his own.
Containment only lends him time to increase his capabilities. This applies to his plans for SK as well.
If he is assassinated, well and good, but that won't guarantee his cadre of generals won't carry on after him.
The only strategy that is best is China takes over.
The only thing after that is a war that must make shock and awe look like a picnic. NK military will not pee their pants unless a superior orders them to. You have to take out all of the leadership in the first hour or tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of South Koreans will die.
Tell me again who gives a crap about what 5 counties in KKKalifornia think?
Hey shitforbrains. Clinton kissed North Koreas ass and handed them all kinds of economic assistance.The only strategy that is best is China takes over.
The only thing after that is a war that must make shock and awe look like a picnic. NK military will not pee their pants unless a superior orders them to. You have to take out all of the leadership in the first hour or tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of South Koreans will die.
Or we could just stop rattling the sabers... that would work, too.
Look, there are no good military options here. So we are probably stuck doing what we've been doing with the Norks for decades... paying them off in aid packages.
Tell me again who gives a crap about what 5 counties in KKKalifornia think?
Probably everyone who is threatened with nukes right now because you guys in Jesusland elected a clown.
Just give them the Rhineland so we may have peace!The U.S. and South Korea are in a pretty shitty spot. Of course defeating North Korea in the end would be a cakewalk, but not before South Korea is devastated. And that's just by conventional artillery. It looks like our best bet at this point is containment, and hopes that Kim is assassinated by one of his own.
Containment only lends him time to increase his capabilities. This applies to his plans for SK as well.
If he is assassinated, well and good, but that won't guarantee his cadre of generals won't carry on after him.
That's why we're in such a shitty spot at the moment, and I agree it will probably only get worse. Unless we're willing to risk a devastating artillery bombardment of South Korea we may have to accept North Korea as a nuclear power. It sucks, but it won't be the first or last time we have been forced to allow an adversary to obtain nuclear weapons.
Agreed. I do believe, however, that asshole should be dealt with with Japan. I know i wouldnt stand for that shit. Fuck the UN and their "sanctions" that fucker is shooting missiles over their countryThe U.S. and South Korea are in a pretty shitty spot. Of course defeating North Korea in the end would be a cakewalk, but not before South Korea is devastated. And that's just by conventional artillery. It looks like our best bet at this point is containment, and hopes that Kim is assassinated by one of his own.
Containment only lends him time to increase his capabilities. This applies to his plans for SK as well.
If he is assassinated, well and good, but that won't guarantee his cadre of generals won't carry on after him.
That's why we're in such a shitty spot at the moment, and I agree it will probably only get worse. Unless we're willing to risk a devastating artillery bombardment of South Korea we may have to accept North Korea as a nuclear power. It sucks, but it won't be the first or last time we have been forced to allow an adversary to obtain nuclear weapons.