fncceo
Diamond Member
- Nov 29, 2016
- 43,126
- 35,876
- 3,615
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
As we used to say in the Navy ... close is only good in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
Has someone done that? What happened, did they miss?Somehow I don't remember South Africa shooting ICBMs at Japan.
What airspace was violated?I don't think that's how the Japanese view it everytime the punk violates their airspace
That the Japanese government is waging propaganda is probably due to their Korea guilt.But like I said what counts is how the Japanese view it, and I'm sure their public isn't having a fun time now that the air raid sirens are going off once every two weeks.
I out of 3.Agreed, but we did not kill Saddam, nor Qaddafi, nor Assad.
What airspace was violated?I don't think that's how the Japanese view it everytime the punk violates their airspace
In which case overflying satellites violate airspace. So I think you're full of bullshit.Actually, yes. Above Flight Level 25 and above is CLASS A airspace over most of the planet. NO flight operations without control and permission of the host ATC.
In which case overflying satellites violate airspace. So I think you're full of bullshit.Actually, yes. Above Flight Level 25 and above is CLASS A airspace over most of the planet. NO flight operations without control and permission of the host ATC.
Quoted for truth.Of course you lefties believe America is more dangerous. You lefties and ISIS are comrades when it comes to hate.A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
Meh, I'm more worried about Trump having nukes than the little potbellied dictator...
I out of 3.Agreed, but we did not kill Saddam, nor Qaddafi, nor Assad.
Whatever, they had enough to drive the Soviets off their land. That's pretty substantial if you ask me.Bin Laden didn`t have a military.
The Taliban were in essence Bin Laden's military.
However, the Taliban did not have tanks, aircraft, surface to air missiles, artillery, etc. NK does.They did have enough to systematically repel the Soviet invasion! Or do you not remember?Bin Laden didn`t have a military.
The Taliban were in essence Bin Laden's military.
However, the Taliban did not have tanks, aircraft, surface to air missiles, artillery, etc. NK does.
They did not repel the Soviet invasion by any stretch of the imagination. They simply made the war so distasteful and costly that it was no longer justifiable for their political aims. Think Vietnam for us.
That's why the US has loaned nukes to other countries. Morality.For a country that developed a technology and recognises its destructive potential to attempt to stop the proliferation of that technology is highly moral.
To allow or even facilitate that proliferation would be immoral in the extreme.
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
As we used to say in the Navy ... close is only good in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
As we used to say in the Navy ... close is only good in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Hand grenades also!
When my son was in the Army, he was firing a Mk 19 grenade launcher at the target on a firing range which was a group of mannequins.
His first shot hit the closest mannequin in the head. So much for "close".
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
As we used to say in the Navy ... close is only good in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Hand grenades also!
When my son was in the Army, he was firing a Mk 19 grenade launcher at the target on a firing range which was a group of mannequins.
His first shot hit the closest mannequin in the head. So much for "close".
Distance is the easy part. ACCURACY to hit Guam requires another 5 or 6 years or help from China..
As we used to say in the Navy ... close is only good in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Hand grenades also!
When my son was in the Army, he was firing a Mk 19 grenade launcher at the target on a firing range which was a group of mannequins.
His first shot hit the closest mannequin in the head. So much for "close".
Depends on how much bounce you get and the timer..
Bullshit tracks below that.Satellites are in space ... missiles track below space.
Yeah, loaned. US nukes are in other non nuclear power countries. So much for non-proliferation. Hoho, but a win for morality.Loaned?
It is true I'm ignoring disingenuity.We did not kill any of them. Are you not paying attention?
It is true I'm ignoring disingenuity.We did not kill any of them. Are you not paying attention?