fncceo
Diamond Member
- Nov 29, 2016
- 43,126
- 35,876
- 3,615
What we did was an act of barbarism.
I wasn't even alive .. but I wish I had been. I love witnessing scientific progress
![lens_atomic_trinity_450_252.jpg](https://media.azpm.org/master/img/spot/lens_atomic_trinity_450_252.jpg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What we did was an act of barbarism.
I wasn't even alive .. but I wish I had been. I love witnessing scientific progress
Yes we know the old/stale far left narratives, but then again Trump is an FDR Democrat. This is proof that their god FDR would not be welcomed in the Democrats of today.
And Eisenhower wouldn't be welcomed in the Republicans of today. Heck, Ronald Reagan wouldn't be welcomed.
He raised taxes.
He gave amnesty to illegals
NK has been building nukes long before trump came into office.
Notice how the far left suddenly believes that if Trump were not President that NK would not have nukes?
NO, we didn't think it was a big deal then and we don't think it's a big deal now.
If anything, I'm more worried about Pakistan having nukes than North Korea.
I wasn't even alive .. but I wish I had been. I love witnessing scientific progress
Yeah, and it's not like we were burning White People, right?
We and others supplied it in order to help repel the Soviets. Others did the fighting for us. Bottom line is the Taliban and Al Queda had an army that was weaponized and trained well enough to drive out the Soviets.Whatever, they had enough to drive the Soviets off their land. That's pretty substantial if you ask me.However, the Taliban did not have tanks, aircraft, surface to air missiles, artillery, etc. NK does.They did have enough to systematically repel the Soviet invasion! Or do you not remember?However, the Taliban did not have tanks, aircraft, surface to air missiles, artillery, etc. NK does.
They did not repel the Soviet invasion by any stretch of the imagination. They simply made the war so distasteful and costly that it was no longer justifiable for their political aims. Think Vietnam for us.
Militarily they didn't have anything except the Stinger missiles that made helicopter use by the Soviets almost impossible. Guess where they got those little babies?
Wrong, but thanks for admitting that your GOD of FDR would not be in the far left party of today!
They did not drive out the Soviets. The Soviets left because their goals were impossible to meet.
It is the same as with our experience in Vietnam. We were not driven out.
They did not drive out the Soviets. The Soviets left because their goals were impossible to meet.
It is the same as with our experience in Vietnam. We were not driven out.
Okay, you tell yourself that...
The question isn't whether or not the fat punk and his regime will be demolished if it comes down to having to use the military option, the question is what happens in the aftermath. There should be a multi national force comprised mainly of N Korea's neighbors in the region, ready to step in and stabilize the country.
You are really pretty fast to volunteer other kids to fight and die for something that isn't all that important.
If you think NK having nukes "isn't that all important" then you're suicidal tendencies are once again on full display
I don't have to tell myself that, because it is true.
Your left-wing alternative history is the problem.
If you think NK having nukes "isn't that all important" then you're suicidal tendencies are once again on full display
Why? He can't hit Chicago, and he'd be more likely to hit Seoul if anything. But the reality is, he probably won't hit anything because he'd face some serious retaliation.
So he has a "Don't fuck with me weapon". Okay. If that makes him feel better, fine.
I don't have to tell myself that, because it is true.
Your left-wing alternative history is the problem.
NO, the problem is, we went to war on a lie, trying to impose a government on people they didn't want.
If we had learned our lesson in Vietnam, we wouldn't be in Afghanistan and Iraq now.
He can't hit Chicago
1.- I see you have no concern for the South Koreans
2.- You think he thinks rationally
3. So you think he can't hit Chicago which I take is where you live but fuck everyone else in the US
4. Nukes are like hand grenades, you only need to get close.
Man, you're showing rapid decline relative to rational thought
Unless they are making war on Aquaman,
Unless they are making war on Aquaman,
No way Kim would take on Disney's lawyers.
![]()
He's crazy and psycho ... but he's not stupid
Ummmm... Aquaman is owned by Warner Brothers/DC, not Disney/Marvel.
No peace feelers without Hirohito, thus, no desire for peace.
Dumbass! Trump isn't the one illegally firing missiles and violating the airspace of countries like S. Korea and Japan! This fat punk in N Korea has been misbehaving for three decades. As general Mc Master eloquently said, "there is no more road left to kick the can down".Notice how the far left does not condemn the leader of NK, they are only willing to bash Trump!
More proof the far left does not care about anything other than running their debunked religious narratives.
If Trump does the right thing, the far left will still be unhappy with him.
Now if HC was president we would just be hearing about how this is the new normal!
Trump is the one who is escalating a nothing issue into something that might start WWIII.
North Korea has had nukes since the Oughts. It's just not a big deal.