And if they were on her computer, that means Hillary shared things with Huma that she shouldn't have. That only makes Hillary's case worse. Sorry to burst your bubble.
How does that follow?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And if they were on her computer, that means Hillary shared things with Huma that she shouldn't have. That only makes Hillary's case worse. Sorry to burst your bubble.
And if they were on her computer, that means Hillary shared things with Huma that she shouldn't have. That only makes Hillary's case worse. Sorry to burst your bubble.
How does that follow?
And if they were on her computer, that means Hillary shared things with Huma that she shouldn't have. That only makes Hillary's case worse. Sorry to burst your bubble.
How does that follow?
The tweet:
"Many of the Hillary/Huma emails were on Hillary's server. Presumably a mail folder on Huma's computer has copies of the exact same messages."
If Huma has a folder on her computer with copies of messages between her and Hillary, it raises the question (for me at least) that classified information could have potentially crossed over from Hillary to Huma during their email communications. If Huma does indeed have a folder with those messages on her computer, she could also potentially be in illegal possession of classified or confidential information. And Hillary could potentially be held liable for negligently transmitting said information to someone who didn't have the clearance to see that information. Thus, this could potentially make the case worse for Clinton.
Please note I am using speculative language only. I am not making any unsubstantiated claims.
Ok, but I also note that your language in the post I quoted was decidedly not "speculative".
Thats an interesting narrative, though.
Ok, but I also note that your language in the post I quoted was decidedly not "speculative".
Well, I did use the word "if" and assuming my dictionary is still current, "if" used in this context denotes a speculative response.
Thats an interesting narrative, though.
In what way?
Thats an interesting narrative, though.
In what way?
It's an interesting narrative, in the sense that it helps me understand your previous post, which without the context of your narrative, did not make much sense to me.
As you say, that's one of several narratives. The damage is done regardless.Here's another narrative: What do you think the reaction would be, if it came out in two weeks that Comey had investigated additional emails and not told anyone before the election, even if nothing came of it? I can already see the Brietbart headlines.
Comey wrote the letter to cover his ass, not because of a "bombshell discovery".
As you say, that's one of several narratives. The damage is done regardless.Here's another narrative: What do you think the reaction would be, if it came out in two weeks that Comey had investigated additional emails and not told anyone before the election, even if nothing came of it? I can already see the Brietbart headlines.
Comey wrote the letter to cover his ass, not because of a "bombshell discovery".
You have an amazing grasp of the obvious.As you say, that's one of several narratives. The damage is done regardless.Here's another narrative: What do you think the reaction would be, if it came out in two weeks that Comey had investigated additional emails and not told anyone before the election, even if nothing came of it? I can already see the Brietbart headlines.
Comey wrote the letter to cover his ass, not because of a "bombshell discovery".
There's some damage, sure. It remains to be seen how much.
You have an amazing grasp of the obvious.As you say, that's one of several narratives. The damage is done regardless.Here's another narrative: What do you think the reaction would be, if it came out in two weeks that Comey had investigated additional emails and not told anyone before the election, even if nothing came of it? I can already see the Brietbart headlines.
Comey wrote the letter to cover his ass, not because of a "bombshell discovery".
There's some damage, sure. It remains to be seen how much.
Turned out to be all about nothing! This isn't from her server at all.
What a joke!
Um, Mr. Comey disagrees with you.It doesn't have to be from her server. Nobody said it was. It's about Hillary sending classified information to Huma and Huma sending it to Wiener. This investigation is about mishandling of classified information, not the stupid server.
There was no classified emails found before and this is from the same batch.
And let's not forget what Podesta's emails say about the Hildebeast...makes "terrible decisions" and has "poor instincts." Seems a bit harsh to me considering how adept she was at dodging sniper fire.‘The woman is a disaster!’: Camille Paglia on Hillary Clinton ...............classic stuff..........