FBI Director says no evidence ANTIFA was at Capitol riot

[TW2020]

Wray says no evidence of ‘antifa’ involvement in Jan. 6 attack

FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday that the bureau has no evidence that far-left violent extremists were involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.“We have not to date seen any evid…

thehill.com

So....just shut up with the lies about anyone other than trump cult members attacking the Capitol on January 6th. The trump mob is still out there gauging when they can cause more destruction.

I thought aoc was there ?

Yes...she was hiding in her office while the mob sent by the Fat Man was knocking on doors trying to find elected officials to either kill of kidnap. But according the Ron Johnson, it was all just a happy, "jovial" trip to the Capitol.

Was antifa to scared to be there? To many strong woman?

 

[XponentialChaos]

I am not a corrupt and politicized organization with a recent history of abusing my power to illegal ends.

You're flailing. I'll take the FBI's word over yours.

Sorry, but my point stands.

 

[Slade3200]

If my country had a fraudulent election to the scale of November 2020, and the Nation's Intel agencyy refused to investigate, and the media ignored it, and people who peacefull protested were censored and attacked....
I'd see it as a coup and would probably be attacking my Parliament as well

Exactly, it was foreseeable, which makes Trump and his puppets lies about the election fraud so much worse. It wasn't political hyperbole, it was incitement to violence which is what it lead to. He made false claims many of which can be directly disproven and the others he was never able to verify, yet he keeps saying them, his idiot followers believe them, and the nutters are acting on them.

I did not see it coming. Generally conservatives are pretty mild. I expected the demonstration to just stand there and make some noise and be forgotten.


I was surprised when the riot broke out.

I wasn't... I literally called my family while Trump was giving his speech and told them to tune in because shit was about to go down. I told them Trump just threw Pence under the bus and there is a mob of angry people that are about to go mess things up. It was clear and obvious what Trump was doing and what was about to happen. If you couldn't see that then you have blinders on. But you support Trump so I guess the blinders are a given

My expectation of a peaceful demonstration was based on decades of observation of demonstration conservatives who, even when pissed off, almost always obeyed the law and demonstrated peacefully and then went home.


What was yours based on?

Mine was based on common sense. You can’t use historical precedent when you have a president that breaks all the norms. My observations were correct. I called my family before the riot to tell them there was about to be a riot. How did I know?! Because it was obvious. The real question you should be asking yourself is why you were surprised and why you couldn’t see it coming when it was so easy to see what Trump was doing.

Trump did not break all the norms.

His style was odd. He was disagreeable and vulgar. But his policies and actions were measured and restrained.

So, you were right, but for the wrong reasons. That happens. Like the way I was initially attracted to my wife because of her, well, never mind.

I was right for the right reasons. Because I can see the effects that a con man has on his followers. The question is why couldn’t you see it coming?

I asked what you based your conclusion on, and the reasons you gave were not true.


THus, you were right for the wrong reasons.


Hey, better than being wrong for the right reasons.


YOur spin is dismissed.

Well this is coming from somebody who was wrong and blindsided so perhaps what you think im wrong about isn’t really wrong.

No one is prefect. Being wrong once does not mean that my judgement is valueless.

YOur stated reasons were not true. Thus you were right for the wrong reasons.

My stated reasons weren’t true yet I was right. So I must have seen something that you didn’t see. Your Perceived reality was wrong and left you blindsided. That should tell you something

 

[Correll]

I am not a corrupt and politicized organization with a recent history of abusing my power to illegal ends.

You're flailing. I'll take the FBI's word over yours.

Sorry, but my point stands.

No, I am not. Your pretense of being ignorant of recent events is not credible.

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, I am not. Your pretense of being ignorant of recent events is not credible.

I still think they're more credible than you are.

My point stands. You lose.

 

[Correll]

If my country had a fraudulent election to the scale of November 2020, and the Nation's Intel agencyy refused to investigate, and the media ignored it, and people who peacefull protested were censored and attacked....
I'd see it as a coup and would probably be attacking my Parliament as well

Exactly, it was foreseeable, which makes Trump and his puppets lies about the election fraud so much worse. It wasn't political hyperbole, it was incitement to violence which is what it lead to. He made false claims many of which can be directly disproven and the others he was never able to verify, yet he keeps saying them, his idiot followers believe them, and the nutters are acting on them.

I did not see it coming. Generally conservatives are pretty mild. I expected the demonstration to just stand there and make some noise and be forgotten.


I was surprised when the riot broke out.

I wasn't... I literally called my family while Trump was giving his speech and told them to tune in because shit was about to go down. I told them Trump just threw Pence under the bus and there is a mob of angry people that are about to go mess things up. It was clear and obvious what Trump was doing and what was about to happen. If you couldn't see that then you have blinders on. But you support Trump so I guess the blinders are a given

My expectation of a peaceful demonstration was based on decades of observation of demonstration conservatives who, even when pissed off, almost always obeyed the law and demonstrated peacefully and then went home.


What was yours based on?

Mine was based on common sense. You can’t use historical precedent when you have a president that breaks all the norms. My observations were correct. I called my family before the riot to tell them there was about to be a riot. How did I know?! Because it was obvious. The real question you should be asking yourself is why you were surprised and why you couldn’t see it coming when it was so easy to see what Trump was doing.

Trump did not break all the norms.

His style was odd. He was disagreeable and vulgar. But his policies and actions were measured and restrained.

So, you were right, but for the wrong reasons. That happens. Like the way I was initially attracted to my wife because of her, well, never mind.

I was right for the right reasons. Because I can see the effects that a con man has on his followers. The question is why couldn’t you see it coming?

I asked what you based your conclusion on, and the reasons you gave were not true.


THus, you were right for the wrong reasons.


Hey, better than being wrong for the right reasons.


YOur spin is dismissed.

Well this is coming from somebody who was wrong and blindsided so perhaps what you think im wrong about isn’t really wrong.

No one is prefect. Being wrong once does not mean that my judgement is valueless.

YOur stated reasons were not true. Thus you were right for the wrong reasons.

My stated reasons weren’t true yet I was right. So I must have seen something that you didn’t see. Your Perceived reality was wrong and left you blindsided. That should tell you something

People can be right though blind stupid luck. You have to know that. So your pretense that being right is proof of being more perceptive, is you lying.


If I found that I was consistently wrong, then your point that I should reexamine my perceptions would be correct.


BUt so far, this was a one off.

 

[Correll]

No, I am not. Your pretense of being ignorant of recent events is not credible.

I still think they're more credible than you are.

My point stands. You lose.

No, you don't. You just know that they are on your side, so you lie.

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, you don't. You just know that they are on your side, so you lie.

You think I'm lying when I say that the FBI is more credible than you.

 

[evenflow1969]

I have not accused ANTIFA of staging or spearheading the storming of the capital

Buffalo Man is not linked to ANTIFA and neither was the white woman who was shot and killed by the black guy

so I concede that it was probably a wacko right event

but I have said that the year long attacks on American cities by ANTIFA and Black Lies Matter raised the blood pressure of their counterparts on the right and directly led to the violence in the capital

Lol, the Republican party the party of you made me do it. HILLARIOUS

NOt what he said. YOu lied.

It's right there above in black and white dumb fuck antifa and blm raised their blood pressure causing that led to it. Like I give a fuck what trash like you says any fucking way. I wouldn't piss on your trash asd if you were on fire Correll. This is long overdue but I am just fucking tired of hearing your trash ass. Iggy

 

[eyesmile]

Your disagreement is not credible. The fbi has revealed itself to be politicized and dangerously partisan.

Your stupid opinion is noted and disregarded.

They’re much more credible than you are. My point stands.

Anything else? Or do you just want to repeat your stupid ideas to me?

No, they are not. You are being silly.

Declassified documents prove it.

 

[Correll]

No, you don't. You just know that they are on your side, so you lie.

You think I'm lying when I say that the FBI is more credible than you.

Yep. There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So you claim otherwise, has to be a lie.

 

[Correll]

I have not accused ANTIFA of staging or spearheading the storming of the capital

Buffalo Man is not linked to ANTIFA and neither was the white woman who was shot and killed by the black guy

so I concede that it was probably a wacko right event

but I have said that the year long attacks on American cities by ANTIFA and Black Lies Matter raised the blood pressure of their counterparts on the right and directly led to the violence in the capital

Lol, the Republican party the party of you made me do it. HILLARIOUS

NOt what he said. YOu lied.

It's right there above in black and white dumb fuck antifa and blm raised their blood pressure causing that led to it. Like I give a fuck what trash like you says any fucking way. I wouldn't piss on your trash asd if you were on fire Correll. This is long overdue but I am just fucking tired of hearing your trash ass. Iggy

The truth burns you, like salt on a slug. Bye bye coward.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yep. There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So you claim otherwise, has to be a lie.

You're delusional. Sorry, I don't think you're more credible than the FBI.

My point stands.

 

[Correll]

Your disagreement is not credible. The fbi has revealed itself to be politicized and dangerously partisan.

Your stupid opinion is noted and disregarded.

They’re much more credible than you are. My point stands.

Anything else? Or do you just want to repeat your stupid ideas to me?

No, they are not. You are being silly.

Declassified documents prove otherwise .. face it!

HOw does if benefit you to assume that antifa was not at the 1/6 riot?

 

[Correll]

Yep. There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So you claim otherwise, has to be a lie.

You're delusional. Sorry, I don't think you're more credible than the FBI.

My point stands.

There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So your claim otherwise, is a lie.

 

[XponentialChaos]

There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So your claim otherwise, is a lie.

There is no way that you actually think you're more credible than the FBI.

Go peddle your bullshit elsewhere. I'm not buying it. My point stands.

 

[Correll]

There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So your claim otherwise, is a lie.

There is no way that you actually think you're more credible than the FBI.

Go peddle your bullshit elsewhere. I'm not buying it. My point stands.

There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So you claim otherwise, has to be a lie.

 

[XponentialChaos]

There is no way you are unaware of the many actions over the last few years that have shown the FBI to be not credible.


So you claim otherwise, has to be a lie.

Repeating your stupid claims doesn't make the any less stupid. I still don't find you more credible than the FBI.

You fail.

 

[asaratis]

You're claiming that you're more credible than the FBI and calling me silly. LoL

Millions of people are more credible than the FBI.

Can you point to one case that you think could have proved massive fraud that was dismissed? Let’s look at it and why it was dismissed. Be specific

I, like the courts, have not seen the evidence. Therefore I am just as ignorant as the judges and you are. You haven't seen the evidence either.

You're flailing. I'll take the FBI's word over yours.

Then it could be you that is the fool.

You lose.

No. You lose!

You think I'm lying when I say that the FBI is more credible than you.

You very well could be. The FBI has lied and withheld information to get the results they want or to cover up things they don't want exposed.

You are naive to accept everything the FBI says as the gospel truth. Jim Comey is a lying son-of-a-bitch also. So is John Brennan. So is James Clapper.

Being high up in the intelligence community or the DoJ does not conflate to being honest.

Our government is replete with liars.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You're claiming that you're more credible than the FBI and calling me silly. LoL

Millions of people are more credible than the FBI.

Can you point to one case that you think could have proved massive fraud that was dismissed? Let’s look at it and why it was dismissed. Be specific

I, like the courts, have not seen the evidence. Therefore I am just as ignorant as the judges and you are. You haven't seen the evidence either.

You're flailing. I'll take the FBI's word over yours.

Then it could be you that is the fool.

You lose.

No. You lose!

You think I'm lying when I say that the FBI is more credible than you.

You very well could be. The FBI has lied and withheld information to get the results they want or to cover up things they don't want exposed.

You are naive to accept everything the FBI says as the gospel truth. Jim Comey is a lying son-of-a-bitch also. So is John Brennan. So is James Clapper.

Being high up in the intelligence community or the DoJ does not conflate to being honest.

Our government is replete with liars.

You're entitled to your stupid opinions.

I'll take their word over yours. Thanks though.