imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,349
- 2,966
Loretta Lynch told him to shut up and like libs due threatened him
Sessions lifted the lynch ban
Hillary slammed the FBI agent as a sideshow
Photo of ground purchased in Utah with Russian connections
FBI informant on Uranium One Breaks Silence Today | Sara A. Carter
A major Clinton Foundation donor named Frank Giustra previously owned a mining company called UrAsia and merged with Uranium One in 2007. But he also sold his stake in the company during Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2008, though, prior to Obama’s eventual victory for the Democratic Party’s nomination, according to The Washington Post.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Tyrone, you didn't do justice to this article and it's importance! It's the entire sordid details from a counteragent who Sessions gave permissikon so he could testify before the Congressional hearings!Loretta Lynch told him to shut up and like libs due threatened him
Sessions lifted the lynch ban
Hillary slammed the FBI agent as a sideshow
Photo of ground purchased in Utah with Russian connections
FBI informant on Uranium One Breaks Silence Today | Sara A. Carter
Uranium ONE... Obama....Loretta Lych and our hero William Campbell. What a read!
Russia never gave the Clinton’s. $145 million. Almost all of that $145 million came from Frank Giustra, who is not Russian.A major Clinton Foundation donor named Frank Giustra previously owned a mining company called UrAsia and merged with Uranium One in 2007. But he also sold his stake in the company during Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2008, though, prior to Obama’s eventual victory for the Democratic Party’s nomination, according to The Washington Post.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
In Jake's world, "yes, Russia gave Hillary $145,000,000 for uranium, but, no, much like the Steele Dossier and Obama's publisher Kenya birth explanation, we're going to tell you the opposite and you'll believe it"
But that’s ok, I don’t expect pesky reality to interfere with your fantasies.
See, many of you are missing the point on this, so let me help a little----------->
What was Cambells testimony?
Blah-balh-blah, FBI. Blah-blah-blah, FBI. I told the FBI what the Russians were doing. Check for 50,000 that they have a copy of, blah-blah-blah, FBI! CFIUS, blah-blah-blah, FBI.
What does that mean?
It means that the FBI has to come up with answers of why?
No problem you say, call in the charming and delightful Homey Comey.
Oh, contrair! Your Homey isn't the person to call, he wasn't in charge, not the director.
Oh, so who was?
Look it up-)
Love it when a plan comes together!
See, what you people(some of you people) don't get is------------>once it was figured out what happened, a trap was set for your crooks. Notice the word TRANSPARENCY all over the media-)
Now then, what questions are being asked BECAUSE of the testimony? We must have TRANSPARENCY, even Obama claimed he wanted it, correct? So how we gonna get answers?
QUESTION: If you KNEW what the Russians were doing, why did you NOT inform anyone on the CIFIUS board former director, and we know you did KNOW this because of the check, and because of past testimony!
QUESTION: Mr former director, were you that incompetent about your on going investigation, or did someone ORDER you not to inform anyone on the CIFIUS board? Be very careful Mr former director, because we are calling in rank and file FBI members to ascertain your knowledge of the ongoing investigation in question.
QUESTION: You plead the 5th amendment sir? You do understand what that implies, don't you! (ok, ok, that last question is a little over the top, but you get my drift!)
What is being asked of today, will determine who is testifying tomorrow, or soon. By the way you release information, demands answers from the public.
It has been brilliant if I do say so myself, and very uncomfortable for Crats. You just gotta love it!