Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Feds Want to Lower LegalDriving Limit to One Drink
jan 15 2016 The National Transportation Safety Board wants to decrease the legal driving limit to one drink, lowering the legal limit on blood-alcohol content to 0.05 “or even lower.”
The agency released its “most wanted list” on Wednesday, a laundry list of policies it would like implemented nationally. The list includes recommendations to reduce the current 0.08 blood alcohol content limit and outlaw all cell phone use while driving, even hands-free technology.
“When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States,” the agency said. “In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.”
The feds want to shift everyone over to pot.
I'm all for this but the constitution says DUI is a state issue. Of course 99% of what the feds do should be handled by the states if we follow the constitution; in particular the 10th amendment.
Feds Want to Lower LegalDriving Limit to One Drink
jan 15 2016 The National Transportation Safety Board wants to decrease the legal driving limit to one drink, lowering the legal limit on blood-alcohol content to 0.05 “or even lower.”
The agency released its “most wanted list” on Wednesday, a laundry list of policies it would like implemented nationally. The list includes recommendations to reduce the current 0.08 blood alcohol content limit and outlaw all cell phone use while driving, even hands-free technology.
“When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States,” the agency said. “In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.”
she doesn't have worry about it. she hasn't drove her fat butt around since her hounddog hubby left officeTrying to get rid of Hillary
I'm all for this but the constitution says DUI is a state issue. Of course 99% of what the feds do should be handled by the states if we follow the constitution; in particular the 10th amendment.
Feds Want to Lower LegalDriving Limit to One Drink
jan 15 2016 The National Transportation Safety Board wants to decrease the legal driving limit to one drink, lowering the legal limit on blood-alcohol content to 0.05 “or even lower.”
The agency released its “most wanted list” on Wednesday, a laundry list of policies it would like implemented nationally. The list includes recommendations to reduce the current 0.08 blood alcohol content limit and outlaw all cell phone use while driving, even hands-free technology.
“When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States,” the agency said. “In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.”
What exactly is your issue? These are NTSB recommendations. The NTSB is an advisory and investigatory board. Making recommendations is what they do.
How does that violate the constitution?
I'm all for this but the constitution says DUI is a state issue. Of course 99% of what the feds do should be handled by the states if we follow the constitution; in particular the 10th amendment.
Feds Want to Lower LegalDriving Limit to One Drink
jan 15 2016 The National Transportation Safety Board wants to decrease the legal driving limit to one drink, lowering the legal limit on blood-alcohol content to 0.05 “or even lower.”
The agency released its “most wanted list” on Wednesday, a laundry list of policies it would like implemented nationally. The list includes recommendations to reduce the current 0.08 blood alcohol content limit and outlaw all cell phone use while driving, even hands-free technology.
“When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States,” the agency said. “In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.”
What exactly is your issue? These are NTSB recommendations. The NTSB is an advisory and investigatory board. Making recommendations is what they do.
How does that violate the constitution?
why don't they just ban it and get it over with. you'd be for that right? after that we can start on banning/cutting down on abortions
what are your accomplishments in life aside from being a rw lunchlady Staph?she doesn't have worry about it. she hasn't drove her fat butt around since her hounddog hubby left officeTrying to get rid of Hillary
State's rights issue
State's rights issue
How does an NTSB recommendation violate any 'right' by any state?
Specifically.
State's rights issue
How does an NTSB recommendation violate any 'right' by any state?
Specifically.
well how about another administration comes in and want's to raise it back to .10? I'm sure you'd be not understanding then too
State's rights issue
How does an NTSB recommendation violate any 'right' by any state?
Specifically.
all this is about it more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for these Governments and more controls over YOU. GAWD WAKE UP
State's rights issue
How does an NTSB recommendation violate any 'right' by any state?
Specifically.
States determine legal BAC limits. I never said the "recommendation" violated any rights. Work on your reading comprehension before responding to me in the future
all this is about it more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for these Governments and more controls over YOU. GAWD WAKE UP
Or.....you're hysterically overreacting to an advisory board doing exactly what congress recommended it do: research and advise on transportation safety.
So....what's the issue, exactly?
State's rights issue
How does an NTSB recommendation violate any 'right' by any state?
Specifically.
States determine legal BAC limits. I never said the "recommendation" violated any rights. Work on your reading comprehension before responding to me in the future
And where does the NTSB recommendations say otherwise? Remember, these are merely *advisements* and *recommendations* based on their research.
It doesn't actually raise any BAC limit.....anywhere.
So what 'right' of a State is being violated by a transportation advisory board advising on transportation safety? And if there is none....how could this possibly be a 'State's Rights' issue?
all this is about it more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for these Governments and more controls over YOU. GAWD WAKE UP
Or.....you're hysterically overreacting to an advisory board doing exactly what congress recommended it do: research and advise on transportation safety.
So....what's the issue, exactly?
Are always such an ass? why yes you are. You come in and overtake a thread by asking the same crap over and over.
you just like to argue and it's not becoming
