FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

You are completely un accountable. You cannot back up anything, even with errors. Totally insincere. My assertions that you support secret methods of mass murder seem ver well placed.

ANSWER!

I'M GOING TO KEEP POSTING THESE UNTIL YOU ANSWER ALL OF THEM
1. Robertson/Jones audio states clearly that the structure was "core columns and perimeter columns" (~18:00-19:00). Thanks! <this question was resolved. only steel columns were "structure">
http://www.imploded.org/BOMBED/s_jones_robertson_061026.mp3

You are misrepresenting facts, just as jones does. See,

Professor Steven Jones

0030;19 EDIT 3 L.E. Robertson-how could the explosives be placed- "Of the columns around the,......" - S. Jones, "and the core columns". Just after the second time jones says, "About 15 seconds" there is a garbled edit of Robertsons voice then it is jones that says steel core columns, not Robertson.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

 

[creativedreams]

Many foreign leaders are now saying disturbing things about the U.S. and 9/11.

Many around the World are saying the U.S. concocted it.

Yes, I've been noticing that for a few years now. I remember German posters on forums screaming, "Stupid Americans! We know, we saw this, look what happened. Wake up!".

Basically, the world is going to first abandon us, then attak cus if we don't control our government. It is a simple matter of purification. Get the infiltrators out then our Constitution will function.

Yes.......our government might have us and the media propaganda under a leash,

but the rest of the World isn't and rhetoric is building against us on the global scale.

 

[kyzr]

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.
According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.
1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.ever hear of moment connections?
2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns. if you knew how to read drawings you'd see them in the reports
3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing? thats called structural engineering, something you don't understand
Answer the questions.

1. The photo of the tower collapsing shows nothing. You're not qualified to analyze photos anyway. No one in their right mind believes that concrete walls existed. Your own floor plan posts show no walls.

2. The Newsweek article and that clip from nowhere show nothing, prove nothing. They would not stand-up in Court as proof. I can bring the following experts in to explain the towers. Who do you think wins? The Experts.

FEMA, NIST, and the engineering community know what they are doing. Here are a few links from qualified experts, not math majors or physics majors who know nothing about engineering skyscrapers or demolition.

Professor: Design flaws caused World Trade Center collapse | Oakland Tribune Newspaper | Find Articles at BNET

Purdue study supports WTC collapse findings - USATODAY.com

ASCE

Department of Fire Protection Engineering - Professor Barnett Helps Investigate WTC Collapse

You think all the democrats in Congress are part of the Bush 9/11 conspiracy??
The Investigation of the World Trade Center Collapse: Findings, Recommendations, and Next Steps

3. Here is a link that debunks many stupid conspiracy theories.
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

4. Check this link out, it has "expert opinions" and lots of photos
Collapse of the World Trade Center -Debunk 9/11 Myths

So we have all these "expert engineers" including Robertson who designed the towers on one side. Then we have idiots putting no credible proof up for crackpot conspiracy theories. Who do you think has a better grasp of what happened? The jet impacts caused the towers to collapse. The towers had no full-height R/C shear walls.

 

[kyzr]

I'M GOING TO KEEP POSTING THESE UNTIL YOU ANSWER ALL OF THEM


1. Robertson/Jones audio states clearly that the structure was "core columns and perimeter columns" (~18:00-19:00). Thanks! <this question was resolved. only steel columns were "structure">
http://www.imploded.org/BOMBED/s_jones_robertson_061026.mp3

2. Here is one more link, from "The Guardian" which should be a very neutral source of information.
World Trade Center Demolition.
No mention of concrete walls. Then you need to define what possible gain the "conspiracy" could have from lying about the concrete walls:

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?
<the jet impacts caused the collapses, Robertson agrees with NIST>

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was supposedly involved?
<do you still cling to the "concrete wall conspiracy" or do you accept that the jets caused the collapses, and no structural concrete walls were there>

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down if it wasn't the jet impacts? <the towers were fine until the jets hit them>

6. I can provide the equations (mathematical proof) for the deflection of the WTC tower if you have any way of verifying them.
Do you want me to post equations for the wind load and deflection with and w/o concrete walls? If I prove mathematically that the concrete couldn't possibly deflect 12' will you admit that there were no concrete walls, as everyone but you acknowledges?

7. Army demolition experts would be needed to carry about 158 tons of explosives into the WTC Towers and Building-7, then they would need to remove the architectural coverings to expose the steel columns and floor trusses, set large packs of explosives, and then string miles of wire to some type of detonator. ALL UNNOTICED BY THE OCCUPANTS AND BUILDING SECURITY. HOW STUPID IS THIS THEORY??

8. If Army guys wouldn't rig the WTC for super secret demolition then Bush or Cheney would need to sneak SNs into the country to rig the explosives into the WTC AND AGAIN BE UNNOTICED. Is this your "secret method"?

 

[Christophera]

Ahhhhhemmmmm,

Your turn to answer questions that ARE on topic.

I'M GOING TO KEEP POSTING THESE UNTIL YOU ANSWER ALL OF THEM
1. Robertson/Jones audio states clearly that the structure was "core columns and perimeter columns" (~18:00-19:00). Thanks! <this question was resolved. only steel columns were "structure">
http://www.imploded.org/BOMBED/s_jones_robertson_061026.mp3

You are misrepresenting facts, just as jones does. See,

Professor Steven Jones

0030;19 EDIT 3 L.E. Robertson-how could the explosives be placed- "Of the columns around the,......" - S. Jones, "and the core columns". Just after the second time jones says, "About 15 seconds" there is a garbled edit of Robertsons voice then it is jones that says steel core columns, not Robertson.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

 

[Christophera]

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down if it wasn't the jet impacts? <the towers were fine until the jets hit them>

I've answered this a couple of times already, but you really don't want to know. It is common knowledge however.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of high explosives that are properly placed and it will fall freefly, steel cannot.

 

[DiveCon]

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down if it wasn't the jet impacts? <the towers were fine until the jets hit them>

I've answered this a couple of times already, but you really don't want to know. It is common knowledge however.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of high explosives that are properly placed and it will fall freefly, steel cannot.

but what happens to steel when it reaches 1000°C?

 

[Christophera]

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down if it wasn't the jet impacts? <the towers were fine until the jets hit them>

I've answered this a couple of times already, but you really don't want to know. It is common knowledge however.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of high explosives that are properly placed and it will fall freefly, steel cannot.

but what happens to steel when it reaches 1000°C?

It spalls, but getting there will require your hot air.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

 

[DiveCon]

I've answered this a couple of times already, but you really don't want to know. It is common knowledge however.

Concrete can be easily fractured by a small amount of high explosives that are properly placed and it will fall freefly, steel cannot.

but what happens to steel when it reaches 1000°C?

It spalls, but getting there will require your hot air.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

you are a fucking idiot
LOL


steel "spalls"?
LOL
really?

 

[Christophera]

but what happens to steel when it reaches 1000°C?

It spalls, but getting there will require your hot air.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

you are a fucking idiot
LOL


steel "spalls"?
LOL
really?

Oops, my mistake, I thought you were talking about concrete. It's not possible you could be trying to make the argument you mostly fail to state without knowing what happens to steel at 1000 C Steel does nothing unless the loads are adequate then it bends.

Getting that much steel to 1000 C requires the entire thing to be flaming for an hour intensely from the ground to the top with a little more thermal potential than jetfuel can ever generate. Ground zero will have many 1,350 foot steel columns interconnected as the central point of a massive toppling affair, or the 1,350 foot columns will be like a pile of hot licorice.

Since that cannot be found. There were no steel columns like that and what is seen is a concrete core, fire had nothing to do with it.

And this doesn''t look like a fire had anything to do with it.

YouTube Precision high speed delays?

 

[kyzr]

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.
According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.
1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.ever hear of moment connections?
2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns. if you knew how to read drawings you'd see them in the reports
3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing? thats called structural engineering, something you don't understand
Answer the questions.

1. The photo of the tower collapsing shows nothing. You're not qualified to analyze photos anyway. No one in their right mind believes that concrete walls existed. Your own floor plan posts show no walls.

2. The Newsweek article and that clip from nowhere show nothing, prove nothing. They would not stand-up in Court as proof. I can bring the following experts in to explain the towers. Who do you think wins? The Experts.

FEMA, NIST, and the engineering community know what they are doing. Here are a few links from qualified experts, not math majors or physics majors who know nothing about engineering skyscrapers or demolition.

Professor: Design flaws caused World Trade Center collapse | Oakland Tribune Newspaper | Find Articles at BNET

Purdue study supports WTC collapse findings - USATODAY.com

ASCE

Department of Fire Protection Engineering - Professor Barnett Helps Investigate WTC Collapse

You think all the democrats in Congress are part of the Bush 9/11 conspiracy??
The Investigation of the World Trade Center Collapse: Findings, Recommendations, and Next Steps

3. Here is a link that debunks many stupid conspiracy theories.
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

4. Check this link out, it has "expert opinions" and lots of photos
Collapse of the World Trade Center -Debunk 9/11 Myths

So we have all these "expert engineers" including Robertson who designed the towers on one side. Then we have idiots putting no credible proof up for crackpot conspiracy theories. Who do you think has a better grasp of what happened? The jet impacts caused the towers to collapse. The towers had no full-height R/C shear walls.

 

[kyzr]

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.
According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.
1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.ever hear of moment connections?
2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns. if you knew how to read drawings you'd see them in the reports
3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing? thats called structural engineering, something you don't understand
Answer the questions.

1. The photo of the tower collapsing shows nothing. You're not qualified to analyze photos anyway. No one in their right mind believes that concrete walls existed. Your own floor plan posts show no walls.

2. The Newsweek article and that clip from nowhere show nothing, prove nothing. They would not stand-up in Court as proof. I can bring the following experts in to explain the towers. Who do you think wins? The Experts.

FEMA, NIST, and the engineering community know what they are doing. Here are a few links from qualified experts, not math majors or physics majors who know nothing about engineering skyscrapers or demolition.

Professor: Design flaws caused World Trade Center collapse | Oakland Tribune Newspaper | Find Articles at BNET

Purdue study supports WTC collapse findings - USATODAY.com

ASCE

Department of Fire Protection Engineering - Professor Barnett Helps Investigate WTC Collapse

You think all the democrats in Congress are part of the Bush 9/11 conspiracy??
The Investigation of the World Trade Center Collapse: Findings, Recommendations, and Next Steps

3. Here is a link that debunks many stupid conspiracy theories.
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

4. Check this link out, it has "expert opinions" and lots of photos
Collapse of the World Trade Center -Debunk 9/11 Myths

5. I can even explain the "pools of molten metal" that some conspiracies point to as proof. Those are where the clean-up guys cut up the massive steel columns. I remember seeing this big dude with some type of pipe cutting torch melting thru the massive steel columns.

So we have all these "expert engineers" including Robertson who designed the towers on one side. Then we have idiots putting no credible proof up for crackpot conspiracy theories. Who do you think has a better grasp of what happened? The jet impacts caused the towers to collapse. The towers had no full-height R/C shear walls.

 

[kyzr]

I'M GOING TO KEEP POSTING THESE UNTIL YOU ANSWER ALL OF THEM


1. Robertson/Jones audio states clearly that the structure was "core columns and perimeter columns" (~18:00-19:00). Thanks! <this question was resolved. only steel columns were "structure">
http://www.imploded.org/BOMBED/s_jones_robertson_061026.mp3

2. Here is one more link, from "The Guardian" which should be a very neutral source of information.
World Trade Center Demolition.
No mention of concrete walls. Then you need to define what possible gain the "conspiracy" could have from lying about the concrete walls:

3. if there was a "secret method of mass murder" what was it, and why wait around for jets to hit the towers, why not just knock them down in a wind storm and kill 250,000?
<the jet impacts caused the collapses, Robertson agrees with NIST>

4. You continually fail to describe the conspiracy. Who all was supposedly involved?
<do you still cling to the "concrete wall conspiracy" or do you accept that the jets caused the collapses, and no structural concrete walls were there>

5. what difference would it make if there was a concrete core or not? If the buildings stood for ~35-years, however they were built was fine. What knocked them down if it wasn't the jet impacts? <the towers were fine until the jets hit them>

6. I can provide the equations (mathematical proof) for the deflection of the WTC tower if you have any way of verifying them.
Do you want me to post equations for the wind load and deflection with and w/o concrete walls? If I prove mathematically that the concrete couldn't possibly deflect 12' will you admit that there were no concrete walls, as everyone but you acknowledges?

7. Army demolition experts would be needed to carry about 158 tons of explosives into the WTC Towers and Building-7, then they would need to remove the architectural coverings to expose the steel columns and floor trusses, set large packs of explosives, and then string miles of wire to some type of detonator. ALL UNNOTICED BY THE OCCUPANTS AND BUILDING SECURITY. HOW STUPID IS THIS THEORY??

8. If Army guys wouldn't rig the WTC for super secret demolition then Bush or Cheney would need to sneak SNs into the country to rig the explosives into the WTC AND AGAIN BE UNNOTICED. Is this your "secret method"?

 

[Christophera]

Your inability to even define what you think relating to the Newsweek article marks you as an agent.

Your lack of comment on the violations of law that enable the FEMA deceptions marks you as an agent.

You inability to reasonably accept answers and proceed marks you as an agent.

Your lack of evidence and continuing position without it marks you as an agent.

Off topic questions are not answered.

I'M GOING TO KEEP POSTING THESE UNTIL YOU ANSWER ALL OF THEM
1. Robertson/Jones audio states clearly that the structure was "core columns and perimeter columns" (~18:00-19:00). Thanks! <this question was resolved. only steel columns were "structure">
http://www.imploded.org/BOMBED/s_jones_robertson_061026.mp3

You are misrepresenting facts, just as jones does. See,

Professor Steven Jones

0030;19 EDIT 3 L.E. Robertson-how could the explosives be placed- "Of the columns around the,......" - S. Jones, "and the core columns". Just after the second time jones says, "About 15 seconds" there is a garbled edit of Robertsons voice then it is jones that says steel core columns, not Robertson.

You are showing your non accountability and intent to misrepresent in a big way.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?


Answer the questions.

 

[Christophera]

Apparently the agents have no coherent, valid opposition to the fact that the cause of death is invalidated by the deception of NIST by FEMA.

They certainly cannot show the structure FEMA claims existed actually stood. Equal protection of law requires a valid cause of death, so there are 3,000 violations of equal protection directly, and the entire nations rights are violated indirectly.

The agents expose their purposes.

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, anyone that doesnt agree with your delusional bullshit is an agent

 

[Christophera]

yeah, anyone that doesnt agree with your delusional bullshit is an agent

If you had reasonable evidence to support you non agreement, it would be a different case.

Your uses of cognitive distortions, generalizations, INSTEAD of using evidence exposes you, ..... again.

Answer some questions.

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.

According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.

1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.

2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns.

3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing?

4)Did Robertson not request a correction for the article of Newsweek of September 13, 2001
, or did Newsweek refuse to correct the article relating to the deaths of 3,000 in what was termed a structural collapse?

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, anyone that doesnt agree with your delusional bullshit is an agent

If you had reasonable evidence to support you non agreement, it would be a different case.

i have, it's been presented
but now we are at a point where i'm not gonna waste my time repeating the same facts over and over to your delusional fucking head just to have you repeat the same fucking delusional BULLSHIT back again
so fuck off and grow a fucking brain

 

[Christophera]

yeah, anyone that doesnt agree with your delusional bullshit is an agent

If you had reasonable evidence to support your non agreement, it would be a different case.

i have, it's been presented

If that was true you would do it again easily or provide a link, and you have not. Basically you show you are lying in order to protect the secret methods of mass murder.


This, presented by FEMA as the core structure,

bears no resemblence to what is seen as the core of WTC 2,

The proof and breadth of the FEMA deception is here,

http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html

 

[kyzr]

The core FEMA described is never seen on 9-11. An empty core area is in every single image showing the core when dust does not obscure it. Heres the rebar. To the right is the empty core.
According to you and FEMA, there were over 12 miles of massive steel columns in the core area, Where did it go? Show some of it from GZ images if it existed.
1)If it existed there are diagonal and horizontal connections everywhere. That, ............ is a lot of steel.ever hear of moment connections?
2)Where are the supposed diagonal and horizontal interconnections? Why are you guessing about this? Or lying? You should be able to refer to official plans with structural details of the supposed steel core columns. if you knew how to read drawings you'd see them in the reports
3)How did the elevator doors and hallways cross on every floor with all that horizontal and diagonal bracing? thats called structural engineering, something you don't understand
Answer the questions.

1. The photo of the tower collapsing shows nothing. You're not qualified to analyze photos anyway. No one in their right mind believes that concrete walls existed. Your own floor plan posts show no walls.

2. The Newsweek article and that clip from nowhere show nothing, prove nothing. They would not stand-up in Court as proof. I can bring the following experts in to explain the towers. Who do you think wins? The Experts.

FEMA, NIST, and the engineering community know what they are doing. Here are a few links from qualified experts, not math majors or physics majors who know nothing about engineering skyscrapers or demolition.

Professor: Design flaws caused World Trade Center collapse | Oakland Tribune Newspaper | Find Articles at BNET

Purdue study supports WTC collapse findings - USATODAY.com

ASCE

Department of Fire Protection Engineering - Professor Barnett Helps Investigate WTC Collapse

You think all the democrats in Congress are part of the Bush 9/11 conspiracy??
The Investigation of the World Trade Center Collapse: Findings, Recommendations, and Next Steps

3. Here is a link that debunks many stupid conspiracy theories.
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

4. Check this link out, it has "expert opinions" and lots of photos
Collapse of the World Trade Center -Debunk 9/11 Myths

5. I can even explain the "pools of molten metal" that some conspiracies point to as proof. Those are where the clean-up guys cut up the massive steel columns. I remember seeing this big dude with some type of pipe cutting torch melting thru the massive steel columns.

So we have all these "expert engineers" including Robertson who designed the towers on one side. Then we have idiots putting no credible proof up for crackpot conspiracy theories. Who do you think has a better grasp of what happened? The jet impacts caused the towers to collapse. The towers had no full-height R/C shear walls.