FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[
You have not provided a reason for the September 13, 2001 article to not be corrected. Since that is true, it is correct. It is logical to assume it would be as the deaths of 3,000 people was attributed to the buildings demise. The buildings engineer would be very conscious of liability and be certain the article was correct.

you are wrong. i got an email back from Robertson stating that not only is it a steel core but that the newsweek article is WRONG. to say that he is somehow liable for a something a newsweek reporter says is simply idiotic. he doesnt care what that person says. two of his buildings just feel down and you think he is worried about a newsweek article? :cuckoo:

he also had some interesting things to say about you, stalker. :cuckoo:

now shut up and pay your child support!!! :lol:
 
lies removed

oops, that post was ALL lies

No resonable evidence supporting your position agent. Null post.

Disinformation does not replace evidence.
yes, every post you make is a null post
you are quite delusional

Again you have no evidence agent. Your post is a post nullified by that fact it attempts to prove something by insubstantiated denial and disinformation as the entire thread exhibits.

You are a conspirator in a misinformatiom/disinformation campaign seeking to conceal treason.

This, ......... is evidence of a concrete core structure and it is independently verified. The brownish colored portion of the top of WTC 2 concrete core falling behind perimeter panels

wtc2coreonto3.jpg


It is brownish from 30 years of condensation and oxidization at the top of the concrete tube.
 
No resonable evidence supporting your position agent. Null post.

Disinformation does not replace evidence.
yes, every post you make is a null post
you are quite delusional

Again you have no evidence agent. Your post is a post nullified by that fact it attempts to prove something by insubstantiated denial and disinformation as the entire thread exhibits.

You are a conspirator in a misinformatiom/disinformation campaign seeking to conceal treason.

This, ......... is evidence of a concrete core structure and it is independently verified. The brownish colored portion of the top of WTC 2 concrete core falling behind perimeter panels



It is brownish from 30 years of condensation and oxidization at the top of the concrete tube.
again, for the thousandth time, showing a piece of flooring falling is not proof of a concrete core
you fail
you fucking disgusting deadbeat piece of shit
 

These are images, just like your ebay DVD contains images. These we can see right here and now and they have indepedent verification that has not been reasonably been discounted from the buildings engineer on .
seriously:eusa_whistle:
listen you dumbfucking moron
its a DOCUMENTARY ON THE CONSTRUCTION of the WTC
buy the fucking thing and watch it and get edumacated for a fucking change

Does it have this image in it? It would be a waste in this discussion because IT IS the core of WTC 2.

southcorestands.gif
 
These are images, just like your ebay DVD contains images. These we can see right here and now and they have indepedent verification that has not been reasonably been discounted from the buildings engineer on .
seriously:eusa_whistle:
listen you dumbfucking moron
its a DOCUMENTARY ON THE CONSTRUCTION of the WTC
buy the fucking thing and watch it and get edumacated for a fucking change

Does it have this image in it? It would be a waste in this discussion because IT IS the core of WTC 2.

still proving what a DUMBFUCK you are
was that image from the CONSTRUCTION????


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

seek out professional help before you hurt someone
actually, someone ought to lock your ass up for harrassing 9/11 victims and for filing frivolous lawsuits
 
listen you dumbfucking moron
its a DOCUMENTARY ON THE CONSTRUCTION of the WTC
buy the fucking thing and watch it and get edumacated for a fucking change

Does it have this image in it? It would be a waste in this discussion because IT IS the core of WTC 2.

still proving what a DUMBFUCK you are
was that image from the CONSTRUCTION????


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

seek out professional help before you hurt someone
actually, someone ought to lock your ass up for harrassing 9/11 victims and for filing frivolous lawsuits

Using images NOT from construction assures there's been no filtering. No selectivity as disinformation agents would want used in servce to the perpetrators interest of evading detection..

You are welcome to use whatever images NOT from construction or from 9-11 you may find to substantiate the steel core columns.:eusa_angel:

This one shows what can only be rebar, and has never been reasonably defined as anything else. It also shows the core completely empty.

spire_dust-3.jpg
 
Does it have this image in it? It would be a waste in this discussion because IT IS the core of WTC 2.

still proving what a DUMBFUCK you are
was that image from the CONSTRUCTION????


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

seek out professional help before you hurt someone
actually, someone ought to lock your ass up for harrassing 9/11 victims and for filing frivolous lawsuits

Using images NOT from construction assures there's been no filtering. No selectivity as disinformation agents would want used in servce to the perpetrators interest of evading detection..

You are welcome to use whatever images NOT from construction or from 9-11 you may find to substantiate the steel core columns.:eusa_angel:

This one shows what can only be rebar, and has never been reasonably defined as anything else. It also shows the core completely empty.
wrong, that image shows something you CAN NOT BE SURE OF
except that it ISNT rebar, because NONE WAS USED IN CONSTRUCTION

and we(myself and many others) have shown you TONS of photos from 9/11 that show steel columns
you are just too fucking delusional to admit it
 
Last edited:
Using images NOT from construction assures there's been no filtering. No selectivity as disinformation agents would want used in servce to the perpetrators interest of evading detection..

You are welcome to use whatever images NOT from construction or from 9-11 you may find to substantiate the steel core columns.:eusa_angel:

This one shows what can only be rebar, and has never been reasonably defined as anything else. It also shows the core completely empty.

spire_dust-3.jpg

there is no "filtering" going on, jackass. its all in your paranoid, deadbeat, excuse-making brain.:cuckoo:

the oatmeal i had for breakfast had more common sense than you.
 
Using images NOT from construction assures there's been no filtering. No selectivity as disinformation agents would want used in servce to the perpetrators interest of evading detection..

You are welcome to use whatever images NOT from construction or from 9-11 you may find to substantiate the steel core columns.:eusa_angel:

This one shows what can only be rebar, and has never been reasonably defined as anything else. It also shows the core completely empty.

spire_dust-3.jpg

there is no "filtering" going on, jackass. its all in your paranoid, deadbeat, excuse-making brain.:cuckoo:

Then show an image of WTC 1 between the 2nd sub level and the 2nd floor during construction.

Or show an image from inside the core when core hallways are being finished. Such would show the needed diagonal bracing etc. You have no plans, so get with it agent.

Or show the steel core columns in the core are on 9-11.

Here is the structural core of WTC 2 on 9-11. Do you see any steel core columns?

southcorestands.gif
 
show any picture of any concrete core ever.

the picture above doesnt show concrete. concrete doesnt smoke. the other pictures you have showed on 9/11 also dont show concrete. its all in your head. :cuckoo:
 
southcorestands.gif


show any picture of any concrete core ever.

the picture above doesnt show concrete. concrete doesnt smoke. the other pictures you have showed on 9/11 also dont show concrete. its all in your head. :cuckoo:

You can tell that is smoke but cannot find any steel, .......... selectivity. A trait of the disinfo agent.

More logically, dust because here, we do not see fire.

corefacesexploding.jpg


That is the same building perhaps 8 seconds earlier taken from a position about 120 degrees counterclockwise from the image at top and at about 1/3 the distance. Do you see any fire to make the smoke?

Does steel smoke with fire? Does steel burn?

The top image is dust and concrete agent.
 
Last edited:
southcorestands.gif


show any picture of any concrete core ever.

the picture above doesnt show concrete. concrete doesnt smoke. the other pictures you have showed on 9/11 also dont show concrete. its all in your head. :cuckoo:

You can tell that is smoke but cannot find any steel, .......... selectivity. A trait of the disinfo agent.

More logically, dust because here, we do not see fire.

corefacesexploding.jpg


That is the same building perhaps 8 seconds earlier taken from a position about 120 degrees counterclockwise from the image at top and at about 1/3 the distance. Do you see any fire to make the smoke?

Does steel smoke with fire? Does steel burn?

The top image is dust and concrete agent.
concrete doesnt burn dumbfuck
 
southcorestands.gif


show any picture of any concrete core ever.

the picture above doesnt show concrete. concrete doesnt smoke. the other pictures you have showed on 9/11 also dont show concrete. its all in your head. :cuckoo:

You can tell that is smoke but cannot find any steel, .......... selectivity. A trait of the disinfo agent.

More logically, dust because here, we do not see fire.

corefacesexploding.jpg


That is the same building perhaps 8 seconds earlier taken from a position about 120 degrees counterclockwise from the image at top and at about 1/3 the distance. Do you see any fire to make the smoke?

Does steel smoke with fire? Does steel burn?

The top image is dust and concrete agent.
concrete doesnt burn dumbfuck

Correct, there is no fire.

Fizz and you are working together. You are answering for him when he screws up, and your answer imposes a confusion by answering a question not asked.


You are agents working to keep the secret of the methods of mass murder used on 9-11.
 
Here's a photo of the express elevator access. Show me where 12' of concrete wall is supposed to fit.
elevator.jpg


Here's an annotated version. There is NO way the face of that elevator is 8' back. more like 4 1/2' back. That makes more sense since the large core column to the right of the man I dimensioned is 36" in length.

elevatorface.jpg


Once again, you fail to get something correct.

Screwed up again eh Chris?
 
Chris,

Where's your proof that the butt/splice plates you refer to weren't also welded. Where's you proof that the columns joined using butt/splice plates weren't also welded together in addition to the splice plates?
 
this is the deadbeat father's absolute proof of a concrete core. he keeps posting this over and over.

he says he can see that this is concrete. i have blown the picture up to show what he claims is a concrete core. a normal, sane person can see its impossible to make out any concrete in that picture.

southcorestands.gif
 
this is the deadbeat father's absolute proof of a concrete core. he keeps posting this over and over.

he says he can see that this is concrete. i have blown the picture up to show what he claims is a concrete core. a normal, sane person can see its impossible to make out any concrete in that picture.

southcorestands.gif
but then Chris is neither normal or sane
 
Hey Chris. Just curious about something else. After all the years of you posting this photo with your annotattions...
corecornerarrowcol-2.jpg


Why is it just recently you "discovered" the 3'x7' utility hallway? What information did you find that backs up the fact that you THINK it's a hallway or are you once again just making shit up? It's funny, but every photo you interpret is like a damn inkspot picture left to be interpreted as whatever the viewer wants.

You need to provide backup evidence to bolster your claims of what you think you see. Otherwise it's worth nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top