FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....
 
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg
 
Last edited:
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg
so now you have to prove that he has the ONLY copies
 
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg

NULL POST

nothing to do with how the WTC was constructed :eusa_whistle:

(thats not rebar. you cant see something 3 inches thick from over a mile away)
 
Last edited:
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg

looks like a steel coulmn to me...rebar is a cage structure like woven fabric....i am sure there are pictures pre and post 911......can't have a concrete core without rebar cages.....ask terell i am sure he has pics....
 
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg

NULL POST

nothing to do with how the WTC was constructed :eusa_whistle:

(thats not rebar. you cant see something 3 inches thick from over a mile away)
they dont even make 3" thick rebar
 
285 pages and not one picture of a rebar cage......can't have a load bearing concrete core without rebar.....

The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg

looks like a steel coulmn to me...rebar is a cage structure like woven fabric....i am sure there are pictures pre and post 911......can't have a concrete core without rebar cages.....ask terell i am sure he has pics....
to christoFEARa, Terral is a government disinfo agent

LOL
 
The reason is tht guiliani took them while the courts protect their hiding

Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.

as an agent working for treason you will not recognize facts of law when the treason is enabled by violations of law.

Here is rebar on 9-11. The north wall of the WTC 1 concrete core.

spire_dust-3.jpg

NULL POST

nothing to do with how the WTC was constructed :eusa_whistle:

(thats not rebar. you cant see something 3 inches thick from over a mile away)
they dont even make 3" thick rebar

Actually you can have it custom made. I would think that if you designed a streucture with 3" rebar, concrete wouldn't be needed. That structure would have to be huge to get the proper coverage on the steel. bridge to the moon maybe.....
A 3" diameter rebar would support quite a bit all by itself, concrete would simply be decoration in a 'normal' size structure like a building.
 
* * * *

Columns

The core columns were steel box-columns that were continuous for their entire height, going from their bedrock anchors in the sub-basements to near the towers' tops, where they transitioned to H-beams. Apparently the box columns, more than 1000 feet long, were built as the towers rose by welding together sections several stories tall. The sections were fabricated by mills in Japan that were uniquely equipped to produce the large pieces. 2

Some of the core columns apparently had outside dimensions of 36 inches by 16 inches. Others had larger dimensions, measuring 52 inches by 22 inches. 3 The core columns were oriented so that their longer dimensions were perpendicular to the core structures' longer, 133-foot-wide sides. Construction photographs found at the Skyscraper Museum in New York City indicate that the outermost rows of core columns on the cores' longer sides were of the larger dimensions. Both the FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study and the NIST's Draft Report on the Twin Towers fail to disclose the dimensions of the core columns, and the NIST Report implies that only the four core columns on each core's corners had larger dimensions.

Like the perimeter columns -- and like steel columns in all tall buildings -- the thickness of the steel in the core columns tapered from bottom to top. Near the bottoms of the towers the steel was four inches thick, whereas near the tops it may have been as little as 1/4th inch thick. The top figure in the illustration to the right is a cross-section of one of the smaller core columns from about half-way up a tower, where the steel was about two inches thick. The bottom figure shows the base of one of the larger core columns, where the steel was five inches thick. The bases of the columns also had slabs of steel running through their centers, making them almost solid. * * * *
9-11 Research: The Core Structures

That portion of the text includes THESE images:
core_column.gif
and

col_base.jpg


With THIS caption:
The top illustration indicates what may have been typical dimensions and thickness of the smaller core columns, about half-way up the tower. The outermost rows of core columns were apparently considerably larger, measuring 54 inches wide.

This ENTIRE website (which seems somewhat "Troofer" oriented) may be found here (Home): 9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

Even a Troofer site seems content with noting that the core was all steel.
 
OMG, agent. You are so inadequate, even more inadequate than the base plate for the elevator guide rail support steel, which sat on a grillage.

w20cuf.jpg


That in turn rested on a 1 foot thick concrete slab.

Totally inadequate for the foundation of a core column.

The interior box column in the below image is outside the core and had a footing that went down perhaps 10 feet below the bottom of the core foundation it surrounded. Both were dug into the limestone formation underlying everything.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


That is what a core column needs for foundation not a crappy bracket resting on a stack of "I" beam cribbing that bears on a 1 foot concrete slab.

The "grillage" in between the elevator pits can be seen in the core area of WTC 1. "Slurry wall" is an error and is really the perimeter footings of the tower.

elev.pits.core.footing.CORR.jpg


The 17 foot thick is now known to extend from the outer edge of the outermost elevator pit to between the interior box column footings which were 5 feet measured perpendicular to the core face. That 5 feet of concrete is outside the core basewall which was 12 feet thick down into the core foundation
 
Last edited:
OMG, agent. You are so inadequate, even more inadequate than the base plate for the elevator guide rail support steel, which sat on a grillage.



That in turn rested on a 1 foot thick concrete slab.

Totally inadequate for the foundation of a core column.

The interior box column in the below image is outside the core and had a footing that went down perhaps 10 feet below the bottom of the core foundation it surrounded. Both were dug into the limestone formation underlying everything.



That is what a core column needs for foundation not a crappy bracket resting on a stack of "I" beam cribbing that bears on a 1 foot concrete slab.

The "grillage" in between the elevator pits can be seen in the core area of WTC 1. "Slurry wall" is an error and is really the perimeter footings of the tower.



The 17 foot thick is now known to extend from the outer edge of the outermost elevator pit to between the interior box column footings which were 5 feet measured perpendicular to the core face. That 5 feet of concrete is outside the core basewall which was 12 feet thick down into the core foundation
you really should stop
before someone actually does lock you up for your own protection
 
No, it was from the first WTC report.

Did you find an image of the steel core columns in the core area on 9-11 yet? I know you've been looking for 6 years.

I only find images showing an empty core area that is surrounded by fragments of concrete walls or remnants of them like this rebar of the north core wall.

spire_dust-3.jpg


You do realize that continuing like you arre with no evidence in efforts to conceal the true design of the Towers core is misprision of felony enabling treason?
 
btw, here is where he got that first pic from

Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel, Godfrey, GB.
looks like he will steal the pics from them and add his own bullshit to it

Curious. When I take a diagram and later it to represent what is independently verified but when gumjob photoshops images of the WTC 2 lobby, (note shaft number plates on interior box columns)

wi1u9i.jpg


to make them look like WTC 1 by putting objects of WTC 1 exterior on a layer appearing as outside the window, it is okay.

photoshoppedwtc2lobby.jpg


The footbridge appearing as outside the towers windows can be seen bleeding through the perimeter columns in the zoomed version.

The idea gumjob had was to try and support the notion that because there were elevators entering the lobby that there could not have been concrete core walls because they would be too thick.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top