FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Gamolon]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT2dXqRscJQ]YouTube - EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY! / MacQueen NYFD 9/11 witnesses[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

its what he read on Alex Jones sites
and the other troofer nonsense sites

 

[eots]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

 

[DiveCon]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

not once the collapse started

 

[eots]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

its what he read on Alex Jones sites
and the other troofer nonsense sites

actually it was from esteemed professors and honored NASA scientist...but then you already know that...

 

[eots]

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

not once the collapse started

so at that point resistance of one massive floor hitting the next would no longer exist ?...lol

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng]YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

not once the collapse started

so at that point resistance of one massive floor hitting the next would no longer exist ?...lol

not once it got started, it was a cascade effect
and it didnt fall at free fall speed
thats another lies

 

[eots]

NIST now coincides free fall speed so you are in dis agreement with nist...and please describe this phenomenon of the cascade effect that eliminates the laws of physics and resistance...where there is no loss of energy as one floor pulverizes the next in to dust and gravel

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkQPmmCr6JA]YouTube - Urgent NIST warning to ALL SKYSCRAPER OCCUPANTS[/ame]

 

[Gamolon]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Holy shit. That's the FUNNIEST thing I've read yet.

You ARE clueless.

 

[Gamolon]

and if such a structural failure did occur ..resistance would have extended the collapse to almost 2 Min's not secs at near free fall speed ...think about it

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Except it wasn't "one floor". It was the entire upper third.

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_evJtpDSi0&feature=related]YouTube - Newtons 3 Laws & WTC7[/ame]

 

[eots]

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Holy shit. That's the FUNNIEST thing I've read yet.

You ARE clueless.

holy shit... the depth of your understanding and information contained in your post
is the real joke lol..lol...you are dumb...lo lol ect..ect

 

[Christophera]

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Except it wasn't "one floor". It was the entire upper third.

How can this be important when you are totally unable to establish the structural design of the building that went down?

It's all diversion from the fact FEMA decieved NIST and the resulting cause of death is invalid. No need for complicated science.

The FEMA lie.

The actual core of WTC 2.

The perpetrators control academia, so engaging them with issues they will address wastes everyones time. The perps love it!

ON EDIT:
The science questioning the official is correct, but it is used to create cognitive distortion and alienate the public from action within the psyops. The public is induced, encouraged to utilize cognitive distortions to avoid any investment in the truth or DEMANDING lawful performance through unification under Constitutional due process.

The cognitive distortions dismissing the science are utilized by the public group think. This happens despite the accuracy of the science opposing the official story because of the impression that the prominant social scene of official academia, albeit, artificially empowered, equates to usefulness to gaining more truth by the truth movement, instead of simple evidence and reason showing that official action is mandatory for compliance with due process.

 

[eots]

Ummm. No.

Are you basing this claim on your vast knowledge of structural design or just "thinking about it?

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Except it wasn't "one floor". It was the entire upper third.

not in the case of wtc 7 and restence will still slow the collapse from free fall

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLy_nmnE2FM&feature=related]YouTube - FEMA in New York city on Sept 10 2001[/ame]

 

[Christophera]

it does not require vast knowledge to understand that one floor hitting the next would create resistance and slow the collapse

Except it wasn't "one floor". It was the entire upper third.

not in the case of wtc 7 and restence will still slow the collapse from free fall

gamit and agents will prefer discussion of WTC 7, which is why NIST was there for David Chandler to confront on video, because nobody died there and it was not a publically owned building.

Sticking with the most useful truth in the specific act of mass murder is a neccessity.

 

[Christophera]

YouTube - FEMA in New York city on Sept 10 2001

If FEMA was there the night before in force. Some have said they were ready for the operation planned for Tuesday on Saturday, and evidence shows FEMA decieved NIST and the public, is it logical to operate a truth movement in a way which can be controlled by the perpetrators, or, respect for anything but evidence and reason, the 2 things most difficult to fake?