martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 82,824
- 34,198
- 2,300
Article I found linked through Instapundit.
Feminist hysteria is causing the infantilization of women WashingtonExaminer.com
Some excerpts:
and even republicans get in on it:
Is the current environment we are in show that the current position of feminism is currently at odds with itself? That is supports both empowerment (i.e. the whole anti-slut shaming thing) and yet see women as needing protection above and beyond that which is afforded to men (the whole college campus "assault" thing going on).
Feminist hysteria is causing the infantilization of women WashingtonExaminer.com
Some excerpts:
When did female empowerment become female infantilization?
Women once were encouraged to be strong and independent, to brush aside insensitive words and actions and to emerge stronger. But now, politicians, pundits, even celebrities are feeding an outrage machine by telling women they should be offended by anything and everything.
The latest example comes from actress Lena Dunham, famous not only for her HBO show “Girls” but also for a 2012 political ad comparing voting for the first time to losing one’s virginity. Last week, Dunham told NPR that the phrase “too much information” — “TMI” for short — is a sexist phrase that “trivializes female experiences.”
What Dunham doesn’t appear to realize is that by claiming common phrases are sexist, women are actually being told that they need to be protected from free speech and that they should be offended more often because they are somehow being oppressed by that speech. This reinforces the idea that women are overly fragile and sensitive — an image that feminists supposedly have been fighting for decades.
This need to protect women from even reading or hearing about the ills of society has become so pervasive that some colleges are including “trigger warnings” on class syllabi to caution students that they might be offended or feel uncomfortable about some of the subject matter.
Even more detrimental to women than telling them words can hurt is the recent feminist trend of giving them mixed signals about sexuality. Modern feminists are arguing that it is "slut-shaming" to suggest that women should avoid drunken sex, but they also are pushing colleges to adopt a definition of rape in which women under the heavy influence of alcohol cannot give consent.
and even republicans get in on it:
The perceived need to coddle women is not exclusive to liberals. In July, Rep. Renee Ellmers, R-N.C., told an audience of women that her male colleagues needed to bring the discussion “down to a woman’s level.” She meant that Republican men need to learn how to relate to women, but the implication was that women can’t understand things the way men can.
Is the current environment we are in show that the current position of feminism is currently at odds with itself? That is supports both empowerment (i.e. the whole anti-slut shaming thing) and yet see women as needing protection above and beyond that which is afforded to men (the whole college campus "assault" thing going on).