Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Obama and Immigration Executive Order

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants.

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

 

[Jroc]

Who are these judges when compared to the great Obama?

Leaked DHS memo shows Obama might circumvent DAPA injunction

A newly leaked internal DHS memorandum produced for an off-the-record agency conclave reveals that the Obama administration is actively planning to circumvent a federal court injunction that suspended part of last November’s deferral-based amnesty initiative. The document, apparently prepared as follow-up from a DHS “Regulations Retreat” last summer, appears sure to re-ignite concerns in Congress as well as federal judges in the Fifth Circuit. The Administration has already been criticized from the bench for handing out work permits to hundreds of thousands of deferred action beneficiaries, in direct violation of a district court’s order. With the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals deciding any day now whether to deny the Administration’s request to reverse that injunction, this public leak has come at a critical juncture for U.S. enforcement policy.

Leaked DHS memo shows Obama might circumvent DAPA injunction

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

Yup. FANFUCKINGTASTIC news

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

Yup. FANFUCKINGTASTIC news

this sucks!!! Now who is going to clean all of my toilets???

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

Yup. FANFUCKINGTASTIC news

this sucks!!! Now who is going to clean all of my toilets???

The fact that our Mexican and South American alien friends are willing to clean toilets is telling. They subscribe to the work ethic and are not a burden on the public fisc.


.

 

[BluesLegend]

The lawless thug will ignore the court if he can.

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

 

[Geaux4it]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

Yup. FANFUCKINGTASTIC news

this sucks!!! Now who is going to clean all of my toilets???

oh! and all of my dishes! who is going to wash my dishes, take out the trash, do my lawn, and maintain all of my pets !!!!

Hey, black lives....... er... I mean illegal...aka criminal invaders matter. NOT!

-Geaux

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Give it a rest. You would be celebrating if they had ruled in favor of Obama. The law doesn't mean shit to you.

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Give it a rest. You would be celebrating if they had ruled in favor of Obama. The law doesn't mean shit to you.

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Give it a rest. You would be celebrating if they had ruled in favor of Obama. The law doesn't mean shit to you.

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

Quiet you.

The author(s) of the 14th Amendment never intended for illegals or their children to become citizens of our country. Both Jacob Howard and John Bingam made this clear.

Howard:

"This [the 14th Amendment] will not include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

-Congressional Globe, 39th US Congress 1866, p. 2890

John Bingham's concurrence:

"I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen...

-Ibid.


All persons born or naturalized in the United States... | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Rexx Taylor]

if the illegals have to go, who will work at the 987 7/11's in Miami?

 

[Contumacious]

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Give it a rest. You would be celebrating if they had ruled in favor of Obama. The law doesn't mean shit to you.

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

Quiet you.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States... | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

UNLESS YOU ARE A GLUTTON FOR PUNISHMENT THE ONE WHO SHOULD STFU ABOUT THIS ISSUE IS YOU.


.

 

[Contumacious]

if the illegals have to go, who will work at the 987 7/11's in Miami?

the Micosukees. .

 

[flacaltenn]

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

Great !!! Then let each state set it's own "friends" laws... Of course -- you forget how this concept changed over time AFTER 1798... In the next century -- the Fed took full force of immigration policy and damn the states....

 

[TemplarKormac]

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Give it a rest. You would be celebrating if they had ruled in favor of Obama. The law doesn't mean shit to you.

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

Quiet you.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States... | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

UNLESS YOU ARE A GLUTTON FOR PUNISHMENT THE ONE WHO SHOULD STFU ABOUT THIS ISSUE IS YOU.


.

I think you should stop posting in big giant bold letters and sit down. You lose:

The author(s) of the 14th Amendment never intended for illegals or their children to become citizens of our country. Both Jacob Howard and John Bingam made this clear.

Howard:

"This [the 14th Amendment] will not include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."

-Congressional Globe, 39th US Congress 1866, p. 2890

John Bingham's concurrence:

"I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..."

-Ibid.

 

[Wildman]

Who are these judges... /QUOTE]

apparently they are good judges who have a belief of our Constitution.

you mean the great destroyer of America and our system of laws and 200+ years of tradition and family values, the illegal alien muslime mulatto from Kenya the O'Husseinbama? that guy???

 

[Contumacious]

THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH LAW.


LET'S SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHER AND 3rd PREZ SAID ABOUT IT:


4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.


THOMAS JEFFERSON


SO IT APPEARS THAT WHAT THE MAJORITY DECISION UPHELD WAS A KKK BYLAW - WHICH IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW


.

Great !!! Then let each state set it's own "friends" laws... Of course -- you forget how this concept changed over time AFTER 1798... In the next century -- the Fed took full force of immigration policy and damn the states....

IT APPEARS THAT YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT EACH STATE IS SOVEREIGN WITHIN ITS BORDERS. IMMIGRATION LAW WAS USURPED BY A RACIST SUPREME COURT IN THE 1860's BECAUSE OF THE CHINESE "MENACE" - DEPORTING THEM BECAME AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE CHINESE EMPLOYEES NEVER GOT SICK, WORKED LIKE HELL, AND SUBSCRIBED TO THE WORK ETHIC - HENCE THE SCOTUS MOTHERFUCKERS RULED THAT THERE WAS AN EMERGENCY AND THE KKK BYLAWS STATED THAT THEY WERE THEY WERE DEPORTABLE.

PREVIOUSLY THE US SUPREME COURT CASE HAD RULED THAT EACH STATE RETAINED THE RIGHT TO CONFER THEIR CITIZENSHIP UPON WHOMEVER

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.


For, previous to the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, every State had the undoubted right to confer on whomsoever it pleased the character of citizen, and to endow him with all its rights. But this character of course was confined to the boundaries of the State, and gave him no rights or privileges in other States beyond those secured to him by the laws of nations and the comity of States. Nor have the several States surrendered the power of conferring these rights and privileges by adopting the Constitution of the United States. Each State may still confer them upon an alien, or any one it thinks proper, or upon any class or description of persons; yet he would not be a citizen in the sense in

[ 143 U.S. Page 160]

which that word is used in the Constitution of the United States, nor entitled to sue as such in one of its courts, nor to the privileges and immunities of a citizen in the other States. The rights which he would acquire would be restricted to the State which gave them. The Constitution has conferred on Congress the right to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and this right is evidently exclusive, and has always been held by this court to be so. Consequently, no State, since the adoption of the Constitution, can by naturalizing an alien invest him with the rights and privileges secured to a citizen of a State under the Federal government, although, so far as the State alone was concerned, he would undoubtedly be entitled to the rights of a citizen, and clothed with all the rights and immunities which the constitution and laws of the State attached to that character."


BOYD v. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER., 12 S. Ct. 375, 143 U.S. 135 (U.S. 02/01/1892)



.