Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Obama and Immigration Executive Order

[Kondor3]

...THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME...

Except crossing onto our turf without our permission... we hold the pink-slip (title-deed) now... don't like that? Tough shit.

You own a 100 x 100 sf lot in Idaho, You are the king of your double wide. So don't get uppity.

Yeah... you're right... but it beats the cardboard box you're livin' in, under the 25th Street bridge.

And none of that has anything whatsoever to do with the idea that your time of pampering Illegal Aliens appears about ready to come to an end.

Tee-hee.

 

[Contumacious]

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

BULLSHIT


To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies,

Thomas Jefferson

 

[Kondor3]

...BULLSHIT ...

None of that old shit matters in the slightest. It's our land now, and we can do whatever the hell we want to with it, including whom we let in, or not, by any rules we choose.

 

[Contumacious]

...BULLSHIT ...

None of that old shit matters in the slightest. It's our land now, and we can do whatever the hell we want to with it, including whom we let in, or not, by any rules we choose.

NONE OF THAT SHIT MATTERS - TRY REMOVING 12 million alien friends - good luck with that


NOT GONNA HAPPEN WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

BULLSHIT


To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies,

Thomas Jefferson

How did that prove that entering the country without a visa is not illegal?

 

[bripat9643]

...BULLSHIT ...

None of that old shit matters in the slightest. It's our land now, and we can do whatever the hell we want to with it, including whom we let in, or not, by any rules we choose.

NONE OF THAT SHIT MATTERS - TRY REMOVING 12 million alien friends - good luck with that


NOT GONNA HAPPEN WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT

I'll vote for anyone who says he's willing to try, not for some asshole who isn't willing to lift a finger.

 

[Contumacious]

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

BULLSHIT


To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies,

Thomas Jefferson

How did that prove that entering the country without a visa is not illegal?

THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED AS REQUIRED BY THE ******CONSTITUTION******* NOT BY 5 RACIST SCUMBAG SCOTUS "JUSTICES".


.THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE IS VOID - NO LAW - NO PRECEDENT

 

[bripat9643]

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

BULLSHIT


To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies,

Thomas Jefferson

How did that prove that entering the country without a visa is not illegal?

THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED AS REQUIRED BY THE ******CONSTITUTION******* NOT BY 5 RACIST SCUMBAG SCOTUS "JUSTICES".


.THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE IS VOID - NO LAW - NO PRECEDENT

Why does the Constitution need to be amended? It already gives Congress the authority to control immigration.

 

[Contumacious]

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

BULLSHIT


To remind him that our ancestors, before their emigration to America, were the free inhabitants of the British dominions in Europe, and possessed a right which nature has given to all men, of departing from the country in which chance, not choice, has placed them, of going in quest of new habitations, and of there establishing new societies,

Thomas Jefferson

How did that prove that entering the country without a visa is not illegal?

THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED AS REQUIRED BY THE ******CONSTITUTION******* NOT BY 5 RACIST SCUMBAG SCOTUS "JUSTICES".


.THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE IS VOID - NO LAW - NO PRECEDENT

Why does the Constitution need to be amended? It already gives Congress the authority to control immigration.

NO IT DOESN'T.


SCOTUS ADMITTED THAT THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ,TO INTERDICT, DETAIN AND DEPORT.


BUT THE CHINESE "MENACE" CONSTITUTED AN EMERGENCY AND WHENEVER EMERGENCIES OCCUR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN USURP POWERS.


WHY WAS THERE AN EMERGENCY ? BECAUSE THE CHINESE EMPLOYEES WERE NEVER SICK, WERE HIGHLY RELIABLE AND WANTED TO WORK IN THE CALIFORNIA GOLD MINES.


SO THERE YOU STUPID SON-OF-BITCH , THERE WAS NO EMERGENCY - SO YOU ARE GLORIFYING 5 STUPID RACIST STUPID FUCKS.


MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the Court.

But notwithstanding these strong expressions of friendship and goodwill, and the desire they evince for free intercourse, events were transpiring on the Pacific coast which soon dissipated the anticipations indulged as to the benefits to follow the immigration of Chinese to this country.


The discovery of gold in California in 1848, as is well known, was followed by a large immigration thither from all parts of the world, attracted not only by the hope of gain from the mines, but from the great prices paid for all kinds of labor. The news of the discovery penetrated China, and laborers came from there in great numbers, a few with their own means, but by far the greater number under contract with employers for whose benefit they worked. These laborers readily secured employment, and, as domestic servants, and in various kinds of outdoor work, proved to be exceedingly useful. For some years little opposition was made to them except when they sought to work in the mines, but, as their numbers increased, they began to engage in various mechanical pursuits and trades, and thus came in competition with our artisans and mechanics, as well as our laborers in the field. The competition steadily increased as the laborers came in...



NOW THE SUCUMBAS ADMITTED THAT THEY KNEW THAT JAMES MADISON - THE FATHER OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THOMAS JEFFERSON OBJECTED TO THE IMMIGRATION LAW OF 1789. WHICH EXPIRED IN 1800. BUT SUMMARILY DISMISSED THEIR OBJECTIONS:


"During the argument, reference was made by counsel to the Alien Law of June 25, 1798, and to opinions expressed at the time by men of great ability and learning against its constitutionality. 1 Stat. 570, c. 58. We do not attach importance to those opinions in their bearing upon this case. The act vested in the President power to order all such aliens as he should judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States, or should have reasonable grounds to suspect were concerned in any treasonable or secret machination against the government, to depart out of the territory of the United States within such time as should be expressed in his order. There were other provisions also distinguishing it from the act under consideration. The act was passed during a period of great political excitement, and it was attacked and defended with great zeal and ability. It is enough, however, to say that it is entirely different from the act before us, and the validity of its provisions was never brought to the test of judicial decision in the courts of the United States.


.