Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Obama and Immigration Executive Order

[Rexx Taylor]

so what happens now? it goes to the SC who may take the case in 2018?

No, I heard the case will be heard in 2016, right in the middle of an election.

what if the SC says no? then what will bambi do?

The liberal bimbo who said it claimed that if the SC upheld the decision, that would help Hillary. Yeah, because we all know that Americans all want the president to wipe his ass on the Constitution.

well in the meantime, we just have to see if they take the case, otherwise Bambi will take the case to the United Nations, just like when he and the left were crying like babies when Texas wanted to redraw their districts,,,,but it ok for Pennsylvania to draw up their districts to gaurentee democrat victories.

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Ironic. So you think Obama is the law?

Listen you stupid motherfucker


Whether Obama is wrong or not depend on the merits


Traditionally , in immigration matters prosecutors have had discretion.


So what happened , the CIC is a Negro?


.

 

[Contumacious]

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Crane v Napolitano stated that while DACA was illegal, the ICE agents who sued had no standing to. But the key point here is that the court said explicitly that DACA was illegal.

Fed Judge: Obama DREAM policy illegal, but ICE agents can't sue

 

[Obiwan]

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

Puerto Rico - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 1898, following the Spanish American War, Spain ceded the island to the United States under the terms of the Treaty of Paris.

So, when did we annex Mexico, Dumbass???

 

[Kondor3]

...The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong...

Racist?

Your basis for this claim?

How is it racist, to defend The Nation and The People, against an invasion of 12,000,000 encroaching Illegal Aliens?

How is it racist, to defend The Nation and The People, against an autocratic President who routinely tries to rule by Imperial Decree?

Standard Liberal Fare... don't vote our way, you're a racist !!!

To hell with that...

Pffffffttttt...

 

[Kondor3]

...The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Just as Obama is not The Law.

The Fifth Circuit's ruling is a marvelous demonstration of constitutional Checks-and-Balances...

The Executive goes too far, the Judiciary bitch-slaps him...

It's the way our system is supposed to work...

 

[bripat9643]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Ironic. So you think Obama is the law?

Listen you stupid motherfucker


Whether Obama is wrong or not depend on the merits


Traditionally , in immigration matters prosecutors have had discretion.


So what happened , the CIC is a Negro?


.

Tjhere are no merits to Obama's case. Persecutors have discretion, not Obama. Ordering the government to simply ignore the law is not prosecutor discretion. Furthermore, the federal government has absolutely no authority to issue work permits to illegal aliens, which is what Obama ordered. I can go on an on about all the problems with Obama's case, Only a lying POS open borders traitor would defend his policy.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants.

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

It's all theatre. And when Lindsey Graham said the Donald would lose in a matchup with Hillary, who would get 350 EV, he was probably right. I still think it'll be Rubio for the gop though.

Eh?

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to uphold an injunction issued by a Texas judge who struck down Obama's executive order on immigration. The EO was designed to prevent the deportations of 5 million illegal immigrants

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — President Barack Obama's plan to protect from deportation an estimated 5 million people living in the United States illegally has suffered another setback in court.

In a 2-1 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a Texas-based judge's injunction blocking the Obama administration's immigration initiative.

Republicans had criticized the plan as an illegal executive overreach when Obama announced it last November. Twenty-six states challenged the plan in court.

Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation

The racist motherfuckers in the Fifth Circuit are wrong.

There is a history of prosecutorial discretion in immigration law.

That's how John Lennon was allowed to stay here.

Their decision ought to be reversed and the case remanded.

Shhhh! Don't be an armchair legal scholar.

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Ironic. So you think Obama is the law?

 

[Contumacious]

The Fifth Circuit ruling is NOT the Law. , its a bold face usurpation

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

 

[Kondor3]

...THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME...

Except crossing onto our turf without our permission... we hold the pink-slip (title-deed) now... don't like that? Tough shit.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

Sounds like Darwinism if you ask me... you know, the stuff you lefties are so in love with.

Bitch 'eh?

 

[bripat9643]

Actually, the courts DO have bearing on a case...

Maybe the fact that Democrats won't accept that explains why pissed-off judges put so many of the rebellious bastards in prison for their illegal activities.

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

 

[TemplarKormac]

DINGLE BERRY, SIR


THERE ARE THREE INDEPENDENT BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

EXECUTIVE

LEGISLATIVE


JUDICIAL


IT HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS A MATTER OF DISCRETION FOR PROSECUTORS TO ENFORCE THE LAWS


THE "CONSERVATIVES" JUDGES IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO LONGER WANT TO ALLOW A BLACK PRESIDENT TO HELP BROWN SKIN FOLKS.


.

Wrong, moron, they don't have discretion on which laws to enforce. They have discretion in individual cases.

Dingle Berry, Sir


In 1898 Puerto Ricans were declared - EN MASSE - to be US CItizens


My great grandparents did not fill out an immigration form requesting to be US citizens. They woke up one morning and presto they were.


Neither the First Circuit nor SCOTUS invalidated the laws (Foraker & Jones Act) because the US Attorney General didn't have the discretion to dispense with naturalization proceedings. Oh, wait , I forgot president William McKinley was white.

So STFU.


.

It doesn't matter what they did in 1898. Those Puerto Ricans weren't criminals, thus no prosecutorial discretion. Even if it applied to groups, there would still be no prosecutorial discretion. This has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion whatsoever.

Look, your convoluted legal theories are stupid. You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Our policy

NOT GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME JUST BECAUSE THEY CAME HERE IN THE SAME WAY WHITE EUROPEANS CAME HERE.


THE WHITE EUROPEANS INVADED THE LAKOTA INDIANS SACRED BLACK HILLS AND WIPED THEM OUT.


LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT CRIMINAL ACT FIRST.


.

You stupidity is unbelievable. Entering the country without a visa is a crime.

Illegals don't get a jury trial. They get a hearing. If they can't demonstrate they are citizens or have entered the country legally, on the bus to Mexico they go.

What happened 400 years ago before the United States existed has no relevance to current law.

So, the Magna Carta doesn't count, Contumacious. Okay?

 

[Contumacious]

...THOSE MEXICANS AND SOUTH AMERICANS ARE NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME...

Except crossing onto our turf without our permission... we hold the pink-slip (title-deed) now... don't like that? Tough shit.

You own a 100 x 100 sf lot in Idaho, You are the king of your double wide.

So don't get uppity.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, you idiot Socialist need to pack your bags and leave this Great Country, period!!!

Lead Story
Obamnesty falls apart. American workers win.

By Michelle Malkin • November 11, 2015 08:11 AM
Obamnesty falls apart. American workers win.
by Michelle Malkin

Well, this should make the crapweasels in D.C. listen.

On Monday, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals told the immigration power-grabbers in the Obama administration to stuff it.

The amnesty sympathizers in the media mourned mightily.

“Appeals court rules against Obama’s plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation,” the Associated Press spun.

“Court again blocks Obama’s plan to protect undocumented migrants,” the left-wing U.K. Guardian decried.

“President Barack Obama’s executive action to shield millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation suffered a legal setback on Monday with an appeal to the Supreme Court now the administration’s only option,” Reuters reported.

Or rather, editorialized in the guise of reporting.

By a 2-1 decision, the federal judges handed a landmark victory to 26 states, led by Texas, that forcefully challenged the legality of Obama’s executive amnesty overreach. The 5th Circuit majority ruled that the states’ case was “likely to succeed on its merits” and that a lower court’s injunction against the White House was “impressive and thorough.” Judge Jerry Smith summed up: “At its core, this case is about the (Department of Homeland Security) Secretary’s decision to change the immigration classification of millions of illegal aliens on a class-wide basis.”

"GTP"

 

[TheOldSchool]

 

[Pogo]

Wha .... WAIT ..... there ain't no Jeebus on that cup! Get the Bubbleosphere on the phone!!