- Nov 10, 2019
- 46,044
- 29,193
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #21
I have no problem with clergy being able to refuse to perform a ceremony to solemnize a marriage. The problem as far as I am concerned is in Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 36-3-301, as to who can solemnize. That problem being county clerk's ability to refuse to solemnize. Refusal by county clerk to conduct the ceremony, I have no problem with, but refusal to file a license returned within 30 days of the ceremony would be a different matter, in my opinion. In this case, the clerk acts as a designated clerk, to receive transmit a completed legal document at a county seat to appropriate records within the state of Tennessee. It is unclear by the legislation whether that is the case. A reading of the bill and the Tennessee Code Annotated is anything but clear, as to if that is what is being said, that a county clerk has the right and authority to refuse to receive and transmit the record, for the record. As is par for the course, the house left ambiguity to be argued on either side, if a rogue county clerk decides there will be no marriages, he morally objects to recorded in that clerk's county.![]()
The Tennessee House Just Passed a Bill Completely Gutting Marriage Equality
The bill could allow county clerks to deny marriage licenses to same-sex, interfaith, or interracial couples in Tennessee.newrepublic.com
The Tennessee House of Representatives has passed a bill that would allow people to refuse to perform a marriage if they disagree with it. The bill, which now moves to the state Senate, is the latest in an onslaught of measures that the Tennessee legislature has passed attacking LGBTQ rights. This bill could also apply to couples where at least one partner is transgender, or to mixed race couples.
Tennessee law already says that religious leaders do not have to officiate weddings they object to. Critics say the new bill goes beyond that and would empower county clerks to refuse to certify marriage licenses, meaning that LGBTQ, interfaith, or interracial couples could be unable to get married at all, rather than just needing to find a new officiant for their ceremony."
Finally, Republicans fight back against this travesty and they do it in a brilliant way. They didn't just allow for officials to deny marriage based on religious beliefs, but also because of a "person’s conscience". That way, if seeing a darkie marry a pure white woman goes against your conscience; you don't have to pretend its for religious reasons - since that would be harder to get away with. Plus, until we overturn the evil liberal legal opinion of Loving vs Virginia, we have to accept it.
And before you go there, No, nobody is going to prevent interracial marriage, so relax. Yea, I know folks were saying just last year that nobody was going to come after gay marriage, but that's different. Society for the most part has learned to get over darkies being able to marry out of their league; but under no circumstances are we going to normalize gays getting married. I have no idea why the House GOP hasn't proposed a bill like this at the national level yet. Who is to stop a couple of fags from going to an evil state where gay marriage is allowed -- then returning back to Tennessee and forcing people there to recognize their unholy union and possibly turning them gay too?