In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.
Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.
1. "Why America needs a hate speech law
2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]
3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.”
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]
4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]
5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/
We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.
The handwriting is on the wall.
Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.
1. "Why America needs a hate speech law
2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]
3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.”
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]
4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]
5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/
We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.
The handwriting is on the wall.