- Nov 17, 2009
- 70,572
- 38,417
People who utter "the science is settled" don't really believe in science; they believe in dogma. When dissenting voices are stifled it can have dangerous consequences and Big Tech continues to be complicit.
"The point is not whether a minority viewpoint is right," bioethics professor Jonathan Darrow, who cowrote a journal article with Kulldorff last year, wrote in an email. If such views are silenced, "public health options may be closed off prematurely, matters may be erroneously believed to be settled, and needed research may never be conducted."
![]()
First Twitter, now LinkedIn: Harvard Med professor censored for contrarian COVID posts
At least the second action this summer by the Microsoft-owned professional social network against a vaccine scientist.justthenews.com
Last edited: