AveMarica
Platinum Member
- Aug 16, 2023
- 563
- 282
Hold on, earlier you said masks were sold as a cure-all and "unbreakable protection" (your exact words) which means a panacea that prevents infection. Clearly what you claimed isn't true, so now you've changed it up and have said they were sold as working more effectively than they actually were, which is a completely different claim.They were sold as working far more effectively than they actually were.
CDC, from back in 2020:Especially the surgical and cloth masks. It's all part of the same fucking bullshit.
![wwwnc.cdc.gov](https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/images/og-eid-logo-2.jpg)
Effectiveness of Cloth Masks for Protection Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
Effectiveness of Cloth Masks Against SARS-CoV-2
![wwwnc.cdc.gov](https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/content/images/app-icon/app-icon-touch-196x196.png)
"The filtration, effectiveness, fit, and performance of cloth masks are inferior to those of medical masks and respirators. Cloth mask use should not be mandated for healthcare workers, who should as a priority be provided proper respiratory protection. Cloth masks are a more suitable option for community use when medical masks are unavailable. Protection provided by cloth masks may be improved by selecting appropriate material, increasing the number of mask layers, and using those with a design that provides filtration and fit. Cloth masks should be washed daily and after high-exposure use by using soap and water or other appropriate methods."
They weren't exactly giving them the highest endorsement either, more like a better-than-nothing if no medical masks are available.