HOW BAD DOES A DEMOCRATIC TV HOST HAVE TO BE TO GET THIS TREATMENT FROM THE WAPO?
How bad? Rachel Madcow bad, that’s how bad.
How bad? Rachel Madcow bad, that’s how bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The impeachment is about trumps misconduct. The Obama FBI never existed. Just like there is not supposed to be a trump FBI. trump is trying to make it his FBI and that is the problem.In a sense that's true. The impeachment was all about politics and desperation. Not about anything else.Zerohedge? Mad Magazine has more credible news.
Yawn! Horowitz said the FBI had proper predication to investigate regardless of the dossier. And the dossier has nothing to do with why trump has been impeached.
The illegal acts by the Obama FBI are another thing.
Silly nonsense. NO Agency in the Executive Branch is "independent" of the President. Contemptible Eric "The With" Holder, even describe himself as Obama's Wing-man.The Constitution of the United States is the AG's boss. The AG (before Barr) was an independent agency upholding the law of the land as defined by that Constitution. The Ag is appointed by the President and approved by Congress but is not a member of the exec staff.Who exactly did you think every AG's boss is?
You got distracted because that shyster Barr spends more time making excuses for breaking the Constitution than upholding it and traveling around the world looking for dirt on American institutions in an effort to render them impotent to fight Presidential corruption while looking for reasons to indict perceived Presidential critics at Presidential whim-of-the-day.
Sucker!
WTF? How is being the president's "wingman" synonymous with your quote: "The AG (before Barr) was an independent agency upholding the law of the land as defined by that Constitution."?
Obama didn't just spy on Trump.
“More than all past presidents, Obama uses 1917 Espionage Act to go after reporters.”
Congress was responding to incidents of German espionage before the declaration of war. In July 1916, German agents blew up the Black Tom munitions dump in New York Harbor. The explosion was loud enough to be heard from Connecticut to Maryland.
The Espionage Act was passed with bipartisan support in a Democratic Congress and strongly supported by Democratic President Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson wanted even more. "Authority to exercise censorship over the press is absolutely necessary," he wrote a senator. He got that authority in May 1918 when Congress passed the Sedition Act criminalizing, among other things, "abusive language" about the government.
Wilson's Justice Department successfully prosecuted Eugene Debs, the Socialist candidate who received 900,000 votes for president in 1912, for making statements opposing the war.
The Wilson administration barred socialist newspapers from the mails, jailed a filmmaker for making a movie about the Revolutionary War (don't rile our British allies) and prosecuted a minister who claimed Jesus was a pacifist.
German-language books were removed from libraries, German-language newspapers forced out of business and one state banned speaking German outdoors.
It was an ugly period in our history. It's also a reminder that big government liberals can be as much inclined to suppress civil liberties as small government conservatives -- or more so.
How very true!
In the New York Post, Michael Walsh asks, how does Eric Holder, Obama's alter-ego, survive his innumerable scandals?
So the DOJ is part of the executive branch? How about the Supreme Court? The President appoints justices and Congress affirms. Does that mean they are a part of the Exec branch? Does being part of the Exec branch mean loyalty to the man over the country? Does that mean checks and balances noted in the Constitution are Constitutionally null and void?Silly nonsense. NO Agency in the Executive Branch is "independent" of the President
Yes.So the DOJ is part of the executive branch?Silly nonsense. NO Agency in the Executive Branch is "independent" of the President
No. The Judicial Branch is covered in Article III.How about the Supreme Court?
Yes. The Political Branches stand for elections, the Judicial Branch does not....The President appoints justices and Congress affirms...
No. They are a separate Co-Equal Branch.... Does that mean they are a part of the Exec branch?...
No. If you think that the President asks you to do something that violates the country, you resign. You don't engage in sedition.... Does being part of the Exec branch mean loyalty to the man over the country?...
Separation of Powers IS the check and the balance.... Does that mean checks and balances noted in the Constitution are Constitutionally null and void?