Fox News Sunday Anchors Upset About Obama's Job Growth:

[frigidweirdo]

LMAO..the graph comes from something called the "Maddow Blog"..well, THAT'S a reliable "source"...

Looks similar to the one from the BLS

 

[bedowin62]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

 

[Faun]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[bedowin62]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

 

[Faun]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Don't worry folks, as soon as we get a federal $15.00 minimum wage law, millions of new jobs will be created !!!

Good you get how the economy runs, stimulate the economy with money to low wage workers who tend to spend it, versus the "job creators" who tend to hoard it offshore!!!

Then your going to see unemployment numbers at 15% plus ....it Will be a disaster across America

 

[bedowin62]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

you're making a fool of your self idiot. how can it be full employment now but not when it was UNDER 5.2% when bush was in office??
you're simply a loser who lies to himself

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Obama doesn't do anything to help the country- he only wants to hurt it. And punish those who are successful or not liberal, period.

And you really believe that crap. Sad for you.

No, the buffoon really is destroying it. Sad that you're so blind.

 

[Faun]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

you're making a fool of your self idiot. how can it be full employment now but not when it was UNDER 5.2% when bush was in office??
you're simply a loser who lies to himself

Can someone explain to bedwetter how the full employment range changes? That what it is now is not what it was a decade ago. I don't have the heart to embarrass him like that, bless his heart.

 

[bedowin62]

more LONG-TERM unemployment under obama, RECORD NUMBERS on some kind of federal disability, THIRTEEN MILLION MORE on food stamps

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

you're making a fool of your self idiot. how can it be full employment now but not when it was UNDER 5.2% when bush was in office??
you're simply a loser who lies to himself

Can someone explain to bedwetter how the full employment range changes? That what it is now is not what it was a decade ago. I don't have the heart to embarrass him like that, bless his heart.

you cant embarrass me moron, like i said you're making a fool of yourself. literall MILLIONS ARENT BEING COUNTED AS UNEMPLOYED...................
you losers cry that things are being counted the same way; but you leave out the fact that millions are out of the job market altogether; NOT EVEN LOOKING .....................AND NO, THEY ARENT ALL RETIRED BABY BOOMERS..........................ABLE-BODIED AND WORKING-AGE AMERICANS are dropping out of the workforce

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

and more Americans are outside the labor force entirely. Who
www.pewresearch.org/.../more-and-more-americans...

• Cached
• Similar

Pew Research Center
Loading...
Nov 14, 2014 - There was a much smaller increase among prime working-age adults ... to become discouraged and permanently drop out of the labor force

 

[Faun]

more LONG-TERM unemployment under obama, RECORD NUMBERS on some kind of federal disability, THIRTEEN MILLION MORE on food stamps

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Food stamps does not measure unemployment. Not to mention, Bush added about than many as well but with a smaller population. And of course, the unemployment rate is now 5.1%, which is why rightards like you talk about disability and food stamps.

 

[bedowin62]

Why those working-age men who left the U.S. job market ...
www.latimes.com/.../la-fi-labor-workers-dropout-201...

• Cached

Los Angeles Times
Loading...
Sep 4, 2015 - Millions of workers who dropped out of the job market during the last ... The nation's labor participation rate -- defined as the share of the working-age ... Collectively, these trends indicate that the U.S.'s potential workforce ...

 

[bedowin62]

more LONG-TERM unemployment under obama, RECORD NUMBERS on some kind of federal disability, THIRTEEN MILLION MORE on food stamps

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Food stamps does not measure unemployment. Not to mention, Bush added about than many as well but with a smaller population. And of course, the unemployment rate is now 5.1%, which is why rightards like you talk about disability and food stamps.

YAWN

yes loon, people can collect food stamps and work. this is the "job creation" you losers are bragging about?

sorry nutjob but you cant have it both ways

try again................

 

[bedowin62]

more LONG-TERM unemployment under obama, RECORD NUMBERS on some kind of federal disability, THIRTEEN MILLION MORE on food stamps

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Food stamps does not measure unemployment. Not to mention, Bush added about than many as well but with a smaller population. And of course, the unemployment rate is now 5.1%, which is why rightards like you talk about disability and food stamps.

yes loon; as YOU noted "with a smaller population". taking into account population increases under obama AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE DROPPED OUT OF THE LABOR MARKET ALTOGETHER THERE HAS BEEN ALMOST ZERO job growth under obama

thanks!!

 

[Wyatt earp]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Again if Obama created all those jobs why didn't they go to the blue state's?

 

[Faun]

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

you're making a fool of your self idiot. how can it be full employment now but not when it was UNDER 5.2% when bush was in office??
you're simply a loser who lies to himself

Can someone explain to bedwetter how the full employment range changes? That what it is now is not what it was a decade ago. I don't have the heart to embarrass him like that, bless his heart.

you cant embarrass me moron, like i said you're making a fool of yourself. literall MILLIONS ARENT BEING COUNTED AS UNEMPLOYED...................
you losers cry that things are being counted the same way; but you leave out the fact that millions are out of the job market altogether; NOT EVEN LOOKING .....................AND NO, THEY ARENT ALL RETIRED BABY BOOMERS..........................ABLE-BODIED AND WORKING-AGE AMERICANS are dropping out of the workforce

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Great, now the bedwetter loser points to the 94 million who are not in the labor force, though he's too stupid to comprehend that 88 million of them don't want to work.

Let morons like bedwetter serve as a prime example why parents should educate their kids unless they want them to be as dumb as bedwetter.

Oh, and bedwetter -- no one is saying the drop in the LFPR is 100% due to retiring baby boomers. That is a strawman put out by imbeciles like you who can't deal with reality.

 

[Faun]

liberals are idiots. fewer jobs were "created" under Bush because under Bush MOST OF THE EIGHT YEARS WERE GREAT!!

unlike obama, despite the crybaby whines of what he was handed (Bush was handed 9-11 by a Democrat President who NEVER noticed EVERY ONE of the hijackers came over on his watch, and handed over the country with the plot in its final stages), most of the Bush years unemployment was very low. that's how come bush has an AVERAGE OF 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT over 8 years. unless you're a brainwashed left-wing idiot who lies to himself you ought to be able to figure out what this means. Nobody on the Right denies a massive recession happened at the end of the Bush years and that unemployment went WAY UP. but for Bush to have an AVERAGE OF 5.2% OVER EIGHT YEARS which of course counts the bad years at the end, unemployment had to be LESS THAN 5% FOR MUCH OF THE BUSH TIME IN OFFICE.

hard to create jobs when unemployment is that low. i live the way left-wing idiots have none of the critical-thinnking skills they like to brag about!!

Great, another imbecile who thinks Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.

Oh, and imbecile, even ignoring the Great Recession, Bush still comes in dead last in job creation. Even by this point in his presidency, only 5.4 million jobs were created. There have been 8.4 million jobs added in Obama's first 80 months, and that is including the Great Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Again if Obama created all those jobs why didn't they go to the blue state's?

Because the president doesn't determine which state hires.

 

[bedowin62]

ONCE AGAIN; because you're an idiot. job creation isnt necessary when you have near full employment you idiot. you're unclear of the concept of job creation so arguing with you is senseless. grow a brainstem

But it wasn't at full employment. Interestingly enough, it is now, yet rightards still bitch and moan on the first Friday of every month when the jobs numbers come out that they're not good enough. Yet according to morons like you, the number of new jobs could be zero but that would be ok since we are at full employment. And full employment doesn't mean we stop growing jobs.

you're making a fool of your self idiot. how can it be full employment now but not when it was UNDER 5.2% when bush was in office??
you're simply a loser who lies to himself

Can someone explain to bedwetter how the full employment range changes? That what it is now is not what it was a decade ago. I don't have the heart to embarrass him like that, bless his heart.

you cant embarrass me moron, like i said you're making a fool of yourself. literall MILLIONS ARENT BEING COUNTED AS UNEMPLOYED...................
you losers cry that things are being counted the same way; but you leave out the fact that millions are out of the job market altogether; NOT EVEN LOOKING .....................AND NO, THEY ARENT ALL RETIRED BABY BOOMERS..........................ABLE-BODIED AND WORKING-AGE AMERICANS are dropping out of the workforce

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Great, now the bedwetter loser points to the 94 million who are not in the labor force, though he's too stupid to comprehend that 88 million of them don't want to work.

Let morons like bedwetter serve as a prime example why parents should educate their kids unless they want them to be as dumb as bedwetter.

Oh, and bedwetter -- no one is saying the drop in the LFPR is 100% due to retiring baby boomers. That is a strawman put out by imbeciles like you who can't deal with reality.

you keep making my point for me and it's HILARIOUS!! now use some of your critical thinking skillz moron and ask youself why those people "dont want to work", why they dont have to..

you're simply an idiot; lying to himself