Freezing And/Or Snowing In 56 States!,Well John Kerry,Gore & Obama!,How Is This All Global Warming?

[WillReadmore]

Abnormally warm Arctic spurs planet to second-warmest November on record

That's odd, every time I checked Arctic temperatures they're not higher than -4F.

Can you please recheck your source

the left will often point to how warm it is in the summer as an excuse why its so cold from December to March

False. Climatologists do NOT make this mistake.

Idiots make this mistake.

Douche bag media personalities reporting on the climate often make this "mistake" (lie, in other words). And some so-called "climate scientists" have also supported such claims.

A (Not Quite) Complete List Of Things Supposedly
Caused By Global Warming

Your list is a mish mash of sites - NOT a representation of what the vast majority of scientists are stating.

If there is ONE you would like to discuss, fine. Let's go.

 

[bripat9643]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Why am I not at all surprised that, given the insipid pointless yammering of the rest of your posts, that you can't even figure out the difference between "weather" and "climate".

Already into the 60s here today --- as the wood stove embers fade from the night before when it was 23. Two days ago, 12. A week ago, 70. Had tomatoes and peppers still growing into December. THERE's your climate anomaly.

(Insert endless stream of juvenile emoticons for no apparent reason here)

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

 

[bripat9643]

Abnormally warm Arctic spurs planet to second-warmest November on record

That's odd, every time I checked Arctic temperatures they're not higher than -4F.

Can you please recheck your source

the left will often point to how warm it is in the summer as an excuse why its so cold from December to March

False. Climatologists do NOT make this mistake.

Idiots make this mistake.

Douche bag media personalities reporting on the climate often make this "mistake" (lie, in other words). And some so-called "climate scientists" have also supported such claims.

A (Not Quite) Complete List Of Things Supposedly
Caused By Global Warming

Your list is a mish mash of sites - NOT a representation of what the vast majority of scientists are stating.

If there is ONE you would like to discuss, fine. Let's go.

Discuss this one:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yeah baby It was 72 today in SC, god I so love global warming...

 

[WillReadmore]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Why am I not at all surprised that, given the insipid pointless yammering of the rest of your posts, that you can't even figure out the difference between "weather" and "climate".

Already into the 60s here today --- as the wood stove embers fade from the night before when it was 23. Two days ago, 12. A week ago, 70. Had tomatoes and peppers still growing into December. THERE's your climate anomaly.

(Insert endless stream of juvenile emoticons for no apparent reason here)

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

 

[bripat9643]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Why am I not at all surprised that, given the insipid pointless yammering of the rest of your posts, that you can't even figure out the difference between "weather" and "climate".

Already into the 60s here today --- as the wood stove embers fade from the night before when it was 23. Two days ago, 12. A week ago, 70. Had tomatoes and peppers still growing into December. THERE's your climate anomaly.

(Insert endless stream of juvenile emoticons for no apparent reason here)

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

 

[WillReadmore]

Yeah baby It was 72 today in SC, god I so love global warming...

Yes.

Nowhere does science propose that every location will experience some sort of direct peril. In fact, some areas will be advantaged.

Canada, for example, will have weather that is more amenable to agriculture. We'll be probably be able to buy wheat from Canada more cheaply than buying it from the central region of the US, as they will be able to grow FAR more than they can use.

So, for example, the drought that hit major agricultural areas of CA was a huge economic problem for those in that area - but, you couldn't care less, because it's on the other coast where you don't care what happens.

When NOLA went under, you couldn't care less, because NOLA is way the heck over there in LA. And, the fact that they are at serious risk of having a repeat performance is something that probably means no more to you than efforts to cut taxes going to disaster relief.

And, of course, the more serious issues of climate change have to do with national security.

 

[WillReadmore]

Why am I not at all surprised that, given the insipid pointless yammering of the rest of your posts, that you can't even figure out the difference between "weather" and "climate".

Already into the 60s here today --- as the wood stove embers fade from the night before when it was 23. Two days ago, 12. A week ago, 70. Had tomatoes and peppers still growing into December. THERE's your climate anomaly.

(Insert endless stream of juvenile emoticons for no apparent reason here)

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

 

[bripat9643]

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

 

[WillReadmore]

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

No, Hansen is NOT an idiot. He's a serious scientist who doesn't always conform to the mainstream.

He is quite specific about what events are attributable to climate change, and he shows his science on why. That is NOT what you were claiming.


The fact of the matter is that climate change is making extremes more likely. It would be nice if there was a "climate change" thing like El Nino, or something, but that's not the way climate change works.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yeah baby It was 72 today in SC, god I so love global warming...

Yes.

Nowhere does science propose that every location will experience some sort of direct peril. In fact, some areas will be advantaged.

Canada, for example, will have weather that is more amenable to agriculture. We'll be probably be able to buy wheat from Canada more cheaply than buying it from the central region of the US, as they will be able to grow FAR more than they can use.

So, for example, the drought that hit major agricultural areas of CA was a huge economic problem for those in that area - but, you couldn't care less, because it's on the other coast where you don't care what happens.

When NOLA went under, you couldn't care less, because NOLA is way the heck over there in LA. And, the fact that they are at serious risk of having a repeat performance is something that probably means no more to you than efforts to cut taxes going to disaster relief.

And, of course, the more serious issues of climate change have to do with national security.

save the fear mongering for the uniformed..


You can take the true motive of the AGE cult of "social economic change " and shove it up your ass..you won't plunge the world in a great depression with your scam since now Trump and Theresa May's is in charge of the free world.



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

No, Hansen is NOT an idiot. He's a serious scientist who doesn't always conform to the mainstream.

He is quite specific about what events are attributable to climate change, and he shows his science on why. That is NOT what you were claiming.


The fact of the matter is that climate change is making extremes more likely. It would be nice if there was a "climate change" thing like El Nino, or something, but that's not the way climate change works.

Hansen is the biggest fake ever to hit climatology..

It would help if you studied his bull shit with out Rose collared glasses on.

 

[WillReadmore]

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

No, Hansen is NOT an idiot. He's a serious scientist who doesn't always conform to the mainstream.

He is quite specific about what events are attributable to climate change, and he shows his science on why. That is NOT what you were claiming.


The fact of the matter is that climate change is making extremes more likely. It would be nice if there was a "climate change" thing like El Nino, or something, but that's not the way climate change works.

Hansen is the biggest fake ever to hit climatology..

It would help if you studied his bull shit with out Rose collared glasses on.

If you want to disagree with something, you should state what it is. And, it would be great if you stated why.

Also, there has been no serious proposal for a climate change response where we would be economically damaged as a nation.

Let's remember that the average gas tax in OECD countries is $2.65/gallon, and they are not dying. So, moaning about the relatively tiny changes proposed by even the most radical in the US is ridiculous.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

and such Bullchit when time to time we will see a leftist commentator gloat on how 70% of all scientists agree that the north and south pole are melting !!! yah? if so, why isnt NYC and London under water?

 

[bripat9643]

Weather is the word global warming religionists use when the "weather" shows they are wrong....climate is the word that global warming religionists use when they attack people who disagree with them......

This is absolutely false.

You can NOT come up with even ONE example of climatologists taking action such as this.

It must hurt to be so fucking stupid. None other than James Hansen has said so:

Heatwaves are proof of global warming, says Nasa scientist

Yes - that article points out that you don't know what the HECK you are talking about.

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

We aren't talking about what the article says, moron, we're talking about what he said. James Hansen is indisputably a "climate scientist," and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say. The article was written by skeptics who point out the James Hansen is a douche bag and a moron.

 

[Mustang]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Climatologists talk about a tipping point. What they mean by that is a point, once reached, when it won't make any difference what we try to do, regardless of how extreme the measures or how determined we are, to try and reverse the upward warming trend.

However, I have a different definition of the tipping point. It's the point when conservatives start to blame liberals for climate change in a vain and futile effort to rewrite history.

 

[bripat9643]

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

No, Hansen is NOT an idiot. He's a serious scientist who doesn't always conform to the mainstream.

He is quite specific about what events are attributable to climate change, and he shows his science on why. That is NOT what you were claiming.


The fact of the matter is that climate change is making extremes more likely. It would be nice if there was a "climate change" thing like El Nino, or something, but that's not the way climate change works.

Hansen is the biggest fake ever to hit climatology..

It would help if you studied his bull shit with out Rose collared glasses on.

If you want to disagree with something, you should state what it is. And, it would be great if you stated why.

Also, there has been no serious proposal for a climate change response where we would be economically damaged as a nation.

Let's remember that the average gas tax in OECD countries is $2.65/gallon, and they are not dying. So, moaning about the relatively tiny changes proposed by even the most radical in the US is ridiculous.

"Also, there has been no serious proposal for a climate change response where we would be economically damaged as a nation."

ROFL! There has already been plenty of damage to the nation from Obama's "climate change response." We have regulations that are driving up the price of energy, and we have sunk many billions down the "green energy" hole. Furthermore, The wind mills that have been erected ase result are killing hundreds of thousands of birds every year, including endangered species like bald eagles.

 

[bripat9643]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Climatologists talk about a tipping point. What they mean by that is a point, once reached, when it won't make any difference what we try to do, regardless of how extreme the measures or how determined we are, to try and reverse the upward warming trend.

However, I have a different definition of the tipping point. It's the point when conservatives start to blame liberals for climate change in a vain and futile effort to rewrite history.

The real "tipping point" is when the evidence that AGW is a fraud becomes so massive that no voter will ever elect another poll who supports it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

All you have to do is look at the weather in the North East at least, and try to decipher how this vicious polar vortex is a perfect example of Global Warming!
It's even cold in Las Vegas, Dallas and Los Angeles.
And this is normally the time of year when these Global Warming Enthusiasts remain quiet until May/June, right? then they start right up at the start of Tornado Season!!!

Climatologists talk about a tipping point. What they mean by that is a point, once reached, when it won't make any difference what we try to do, regardless of how extreme the measures or how determined we are, to try and reverse the upward warming trend.

However, I have a different definition of the tipping point. It's the point when conservatives start to blame liberals for climate change in a vain and futile effort to rewrite history.

We are already past the point of no return didn't you get the memo from the AGW cult last month?


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It points out that what you said is dead wrong. James Hansen is a world famous climate scientist, and he said exactly what you claim climate scientists never say.

Now admit you're an ignorant moron.

No, you are wrong for two clear reasons:

- the article points out that his results are NOT consistent with the majority of science.

- it points to very specific problems that his techniques clearly ascribe to climate change. That's not even SLIGHTLY similar to your claim that there is willy nilly attribution to climate change every time there is a natural disaster. He points to specific scientific evidence concerning specific results.

You mean the article points out that Hansen is an idiot. Hansen himself says recent heat waves are proof of global warming. Allow me to quote from the article.

The relentless, weather-gone-crazy heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare it cannot be anything but man-made global warming, a top Nasa scientist says.​

The research, by a man often called the "godfather of global warming" says the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than one in 300. Now the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by Professor James Hansen.

He says that statistically what is happening is not random or normal, but simply climate change.

"This is not some scientific theory. We are now experiencing scientific fact," Prof Hansen said.​

No, Hansen is NOT an idiot. He's a serious scientist who doesn't always conform to the mainstream.

He is quite specific about what events are attributable to climate change, and he shows his science on why. That is NOT what you were claiming.


The fact of the matter is that climate change is making extremes more likely. It would be nice if there was a "climate change" thing like El Nino, or something, but that's not the way climate change works.

Hansen is the biggest fake ever to hit climatology..

It would help if you studied his bull shit with out Rose collared glasses on.

If you want to disagree with something, you should state what it is. And, it would be great if you stated why.

Also, there has been no serious proposal for a climate change response where we would be economically damaged as a nation.

Let's remember that the average gas tax in OECD countries is $2.65/gallon, and they are not dying. So, moaning about the relatively tiny changes proposed by even the most radical in the US is ridiculous.

Like I always said liberals don't know math, economics or business..



God you are a fucking moron..



.