rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,831
- 160,045
- 2,615
Mortimer is much smarter than youI am a hell of a lot smarter than anyone else on this forum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mortimer is much smarter than youI am a hell of a lot smarter than anyone else on this forum.
So am I what? Are you drunk?So are you!
Thats a low bar.Mortimer is much smarter than you
You are a well-documented dumbass!So am I what? Are you drunk?
So to discuss the 1st balloon briefly. Riddle me this:I am a hell of a lot smarter than anyone else on this forum.
And he would be correct.Reagan would call Gaetz a supporter of our enemies.
Russia's nuclear arsenal is the biggest existential threat to the US. Any weakening of Russia's military capability is a good thing.As an American taxpayer, how is it in my best interest to send $100 billion to Ukraine to extend a war and kill thousands of Russian and Ukrainian citizens?
Specifically, how will this benefit me?
Russia's nuclear arsenal is the biggest existential threat to the US. Any weakening of Russia's military capability is a good thing.
Why did the US spend $24b a year keeping forces in the EU for 70-years? Because of the threat Russia posed to the EU.
If Russia's military is weakened adequately in Ukraine the US should bring forces home and save $24b a year.
#1So to discuss the 1st balloon briefly. Riddle me this:
1. Would you have shot the balloon down in the Pacific, even if it was not recoverable?
2. Letting it fly over Alaska and then not shooting it down because it might have hit someone seems incoherent to me. I would have asked the military "what was the lowest probability over AK that you chose NOT to shoot it down?" 1 in 10, 1 in 1,000,000, 1 in a billion? We know that there is never a ZERO probability, but there should have been some minimal or acceptable risk area in AK to shoot it down. Did the WH say no shooting unless there is zero risk?
3. Failing shooting it down over AK, did the US ask Canada to shoot it down before it overflew Montana and the sensitive US areas? If not why not?
4. IMHO Biden got paid by Xi to let their surveillance balloon overfly US military areas. The Liberal World Order strikes again.
Obviously. So I can't help but wonder why it didn't happen. Is the WH on the wrong side?
Russia's nuclear arsenal is the biggest existential threat to the US. Any weakening of Russia's military capability is a good thing.
Why did the US spend $24b a year keeping forces in the EU for 70-years? Because of the threat Russia posed to the EU.
If Russia's military is weakened adequately in Ukraine the US should bring forces home and save $24b a year.
You idiot! there has never been any peace talks!Here is a crazy idea.
Lets figure out a diplomatic solution and stop the war?
We are destroying the entire nation of Ukraine just to weaken the Russian military, That is FUCKED UP.
NATO WANTS THIS WAR. BORIS JOHNSON FLEW TO ISTANBUL AND TOLD ZELENSKY TO PULL OUT OF THE PEACE TALKS.
Why would there be when the beggar king Zelensky can go beg for handouts every weekYou idiot! there has never been any peace talks!
Seriously, you shouldnt be drinking this early in the day.You are a well-documented dumbass!
You ask pretty dumb questions for someone supposedly so damn smart.WTF is Astonia?