Gay Activist Site Sanctity Of Marriege To Prtest Two Straigh Guys Getting Married

[Pop23]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Bodey to the rescue.

At least you are big enough to see the difference.

There is a reason one group is classified as heterosexual and another homosexual.

Kudos Bodey

 

[deltex1]

I have been anticipating this for years. When two fishing buddies decide to get the benefits gay folks have lusted after for years...without all the prancing and dancing.

Straights have been doing it for as long as we've had benefits of marriage.

MYOB.

Only gays would notice.

Only a few...like you...care.

The only marriage benefit I received...or was aware of...was my children...the rest went unnoticed.

 

[ShackledNation]

I have been anticipating this for years. When two fishing buddies decide to get the benefits gay folks have lusted after for years...without all the prancing and dancing.

Straights have been doing it for as long as we've had benefits of marriage.

MYOB.

Only gays would notice.

Only a few...like you...care.

The only marriage benefit I received...or was aware of...was my children...the rest went unnoticed.

You needed a government marriage license to have the benefit of children?

 

[deltex1]

I have been anticipating this for years. When two fishing buddies decide to get the benefits gay folks have lusted after for years...without all the prancing and dancing.

Straights have been doing it for as long as we've had benefits of marriage.

MYOB.

Only gays would notice.

Only a few...like you...care.

The only marriage benefit I received...or was aware of...was my children...the rest went unnoticed.

You needed a government marriage license to have the benefit of children?

My name ain't Marquand, homie....

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You must be illiterate.

I must be illiterate because I actually read the article?

Dayam.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You are illiterate.

I never said humans reproduce asexually. Such a Strawman tends to be the only argument of somebody like you that has no argument.

Homosexuals can have children because they belong to a sexual species.

You haven't listed anything that heterosexuals can do that homosexuals can't

Do you know what asexual means? Hint, it does not involve a couple.

 

[Inevitable]

You must be illiterate.

I must be illiterate because I actually read the article?

Dayam.

You are illiterate.

I never said humans reproduce asexually. Such a Strawman tends to be the only argument of somebody like you that has no argument.

Homosexuals can have children because they belong to a sexual species.

You haven't listed anything that heterosexuals can do that homosexuals can't

Do you know what asexual means? Hint, it does not involve a couple.

Do you know how humans breed?

 

[Inevitable]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

Such a child we are dealing with here.

You answered your own feeble question. There is a difference , and you dumbass, pointed it out.

What a clown

No, the correct answer is nothing. there is nothing a heterosexual couple can do that homosexuals can not.

Other than some minor details involving crotches. So the sanctity of marriage is based on a crotch. You have no argument.

But the inevitable will occur, you will just have to sit and rotate.

Other than some minor details involving crotches.

^^^^^ your own words answer your own question.

What I nimrod

Those minor details account for human life

Your jealousy is delicious.

So you contend that homosexuals are sterile?

For your pathetic attempt at insults to have any effect, you would have to be more than an inbred idiot.

You are pathetic

You had a specific question, then , because you see how wrong you are, you change the goal post.

Go cry elsewhere you pathetic hack

Inbred moron.

 

[Inevitable]

Okay, my apologies, I was distracted by inbred morons.

I think it's ridiculous to worry with what others do.

The sanctity of a marriage has nothing to do with what others do. I don't see why anybody is upset. I find it ironic that it's the gay activists groups that are getting upset.

You are right, it is no ones business except the two getting married. However, they are being stupid, IMHO.

Meh, people will be stupid.

 

[MaryL]

Gays are like ticks, except they got money and lawyers. Gays are a piddley 3 percent of the bloody population, but the way THEY make it sound, they are a large new undiscovered class of human beings. And, they are being deprived of their "rights". All the rights all the rest of us have, that isn't enough....Really?

 

[Papageorgio]

Meh, people will be stupid.

You got that right.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Hello Commander

How many hours in frame?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Do you know how humans breed?

I am not the one that is insisting that a gay couple can have children by having sex with each other, am I?

 

[Inevitable]

Do you know how humans breed?

I am not the one that is insisting that a gay couple can have children by having sex with each other, am I?

Neither am I.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Neither am I.

When did you stop?

 

[HenryBHough]

They do seem to enjoy trying.

 

[bodecea]

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Bodey to the rescue.

At least you are big enough to see the difference.

There is a reason one group is classified as heterosexual and another homosexual.

Kudos Bodey

Yes...because of whom they love. Procreation is not needed for marriage...marriage is not needed for procreation. They are two different things that frequently overlap....but one is not necessary for the other.

 

[bodecea]

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Hello Commander

How many hours in frame?

How much is it worth for you to know?

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Hello Commander

How many hours in frame?

How much is it worth for you to know?

I already know, Commander.

 

[bodecea]

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

The third party jazz answered the question. Now I have a question.

What can a fertile heterosexual couple do that an infertile heterosexual couple cannot? (Hint: the answer is the same as the answer to your silly question).

Well...they can BOTH get married....

Hello Commander

How many hours in frame?

How much is it worth for you to know?

I already know, Commander.

So...If you want personal info on me....it will cost. $100 to answer your first question on how many hours I flew C-130s. I will need it to be in PayPal.