Gay Activist Site Sanctity Of Marriege To Prtest Two Straigh Guys Getting Married

[Pop23]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

 

[Inevitable]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

 

[Pop23]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

Now now, he can't let facts get in the way of his idiocy.

He asked a question, the question was answered. He didn't like the answer, even though it's true, so like all such idiots, he throws a hissy fit.

 

[Pop23]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

Such a child we are dealing with here.

You answered your own feeble question. There is a difference , and you dumbass, pointed it out.

What a clown

 

[Papageorgio]

So if the marriage is legal, why are the gay groups upset? Who gave them a right to determine who can marry?

Not seeing the logic.

 

[Inevitable]

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

Relevance?

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

That isn't a human right. Sorry.

What is this crap about a catalogue?

 

[Inevitable]

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

Relevance?

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

That isn't a human right. Sorry.

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

What's this third party jazz. You asked what married couples could do that homosexual COUPLES couldn't. A third party is not a part of a couple.

When homosexuals employ the services of a third party to conceive the child they've now violated the human rights of the child that's been conceived. That child has a right to be raised by his mother and father, not by two men who cast away the child's mother. A child is not a commodity for you to buy and sell, to pick from a catalog.

Now now, he can't let facts get in the way of his idiocy.

He asked a question, the question was answered. He didn't like the answer, even though it's true, so like all such idiots, he throws a hissy fit.

No, my question was answered incorrectly. Your answer is not related to the question.

 

[Inevitable]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

Such a child we are dealing with here.

You answered your own feeble question. There is a difference , and you dumbass, pointed it out.

What a clown

No, the correct answer is nothing. there is nothing a heterosexual couple can do that homosexuals can not.

Other than some minor details involving crotches. So the sanctity of marriage is based on a crotch. You have no argument.

But the inevitable will occur, you will just have to sit and rotate.

 

[Inevitable]

Delete

 

[Noomi]

Gee, fags wanting to define marriage. didn't see that one coming.

They are not gay men, though.

 

[Papageorgio]

They are not gay men, though.

So, they want to get married, what business is it of anyone else?

It is the gay community that is upset, why?

 

[Inevitable]

They are not gay men, though.

So, they want to get married, what business is it of anyone else?

It is the gay community that is upset, why?

Some states forbid it.

 

[Pop23]

Gay marriage is a joke. Now you know why.

So...since marriages of convenience have been around for straights a very long time.....you will agree that Straight marriage is a joke too.

Marriage serves a purpose. Homosexual "marriage" doesn't.

Sure it does.
All the same things it does for heterosexuals.

What can a married heterosexual couple do that homosexuals can't?

Time for you do go back to basic sex ed class.

You said marriage, what does sex ed have to do with that?

Furthermore...

Is it your contention that homosexual equals sterile?

You asked what a married couple could do that two homosexuals couldn't. Think crib, think diaper.

Yeah, homosexuals can do that too.

Homosexual doesn't mean sterile.

You are speaking of a couple when you speak in terms of a marriage. Your answer indicates you don't understand your own question.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Why do you need to dance around the question with riddles like a coward?

Riddles?

You are warped peewee

You are the idiot saying homosexuality equals sterility.

I get it , you're a clown

Here are your words.

Just say what a heterosexual couple can do that homosexual couples can't.

Dumbass, they can not conceive a child through intercourse by the two within the couple.

There, it was spelled out for you.

Now, provide the name of a single child conceived by intercourse between two men.

Moron, I never argued that humans reproduce asexually. So there was never a human child conceived asexually. What a stupid question but then again consider the source.

Now that your retarded strawman is dealt with, on to the argument you finally managed to spell out.

Who cares if homosexuals need a third party to reproduce, it's not like heterosexuals never do that.

Now that your stupid argument is destroyed what else do you have?

Such a child we are dealing with here.

You answered your own feeble question. There is a difference , and you dumbass, pointed it out.

What a clown

No, the correct answer is nothing. there is nothing a heterosexual couple can do that homosexuals can not.

Other than some minor details involving crotches. So the sanctity of marriage is based on a crotch. You have no argument.

But the inevitable will occur, you will just have to sit and rotate.

Other than some minor details involving crotches.

^^^^^ your own words answer your own question.

What I nimrod

Those minor details account for human life

Your jealousy is delicious.

 

[Papageorgio]

Some states forbid it.

We are talking about New Zealand, the gay community is upset that two men are getting married to win a contest..

 

[Pop23]

Gee, fags wanting to define marriage. didn't see that one coming.

They are not gay men, though.

Point?

 

[Papageorgio]

Point?

Only gays can approve marriages. Funny how they want everyone to accept their ideas, yet have no tolerance for anyone else. Don they have the right to marry?

 

[hipeter924]

Some states forbid it.

We are talking about New Zealand, the gay community is upset that two men are getting married to win a contest..

Hardly. One university professor, one local gay rights group, and a tabloid raving about it, a whole community doesn't make. It was hardly covered at all, and the issue didn't survive any more than a day in the paper.

 

[Papageorgio]

Hardly. One university professor, one local gay rights group, and a tabloid raving about it, a whole community doesn't make. It was hardly covered at all, and the issue didn't survive any more than a day in the paper.

Yeah, read your other post claiming it's no big deal. Several newspapers and several gay groups are upset, according to what I am reading.

We will see where it goes, but it seems to have several people upset.

 

[Pop23]

Hardly. One university professor, one local gay rights group, and a tabloid raving about it, a whole community doesn't make. It was hardly covered at all, and the issue didn't survive any more than a day in the paper.

Yeah, read your other post claiming it's no big deal. Several newspapers and several gay groups are upset, according to what I am reading.

We will see where it goes, but it seems to have several people upset.

Why is even an issue?

Why would a single gay be upset.

They get what the want, and still get pissy about it?

Good Lord