Stimulates the crap out of the economy though.I'm this way. All in or all out. No middle ground. Either anyone gets to put in money in the ring for the candidate they want (Provided they can vote or are part of a US organization and all funds are trackable) or nobody gets to put any money in the ring and we have a portion of yearly tax revenue used to fund all campaigns with NO political speech allowed for anyone not a candidate.
Since the Supreme Court says money is speech, then it's an All In framework. Just make all donors public and transparent. GE wants to give 40 million to P-BO, fine. You know who owns him. If Bain Capital wants to do the same, fine. Same deal. If the UAW wants Dingler reelected, you know who owns him.
That's the way it SHOULD be in our current system. All parties allowed.
And if this isn't going to be done, NOBODY gets money or say.
Yes.
I'd prefer they do it like in England.
NO money. I mean - look at this huge waste of money!!
Where do you think all that money goes? Who gets a paycheck?
The media.
Yeah, they're hurting.