George Zimmerman involved in shooting

The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense, so if Apperson was stalking Zimmerman that's not a problem. We also don't know for sure what happened. We do know Zimmerman carries a gun in his car, and we do know he's willing to use it. If he did go for his weapon, why wouldn't a reasonable person believe he would use it and fear for his life?

had Apperson killed Zimmerman there would be more evidence to support self defense than Zimmerman had with Martin. He should have learned from Zimmerman and killed the only other witness.
 
The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense...
"Not guilty".
You don't have to like it but you do have to admit it to yourself and get over it.
 
The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense...
"Not guilty".
You don't have to like it but you do have to admit it to yourself and get over it.
Oh i get that he wasn't convicted. That was the point. Stalking someone is apparently not an impediment to claiming self-defense
 
That's the problem with playing cowboy; you only have to be slow on the draw once.
 
The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense...
"Not guilty".
You don't have to like it but you do have to admit it to yourself and get over it.
Oh i get that he wasn't convicted. That was the point. Stalking someone is apparently not an impediment to claiming self-defense
Or... the trial evidence illustrated that said 'stalking' was neither an initiation nor an escalation of conflict and therefore did not invalidate a legitimate claim of self-defense.
 
The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense...
"Not guilty".
You don't have to like it but you do have to admit it to yourself and get over it.
Oh i get that he wasn't convicted. That was the point. Stalking someone is apparently not an impediment to claiming self-defense
Or... the trial evidence illustrated that said 'stalking' was neither an initiation nor an escalation of conflict and therefore did not invalidate a legitimate claim of self-defense.
So exactly what i said. Stalking someone doesn't prevent you from claiming self defense
 
The whackjob looks/acts like he's high.
Attempted murder will be the charge. Five years mandatory.
He's just the type those 300 negro queers in Fed. prision like to pimp out.
By the time he gets out he'll be able to see his flip-flops through his asshole.
George Zimmerman himself proved you could stalk somebody and still claim self defense...
"Not guilty".
You don't have to like it but you do have to admit it to yourself and get over it.
Oh i get that he wasn't convicted. That was the point. Stalking someone is apparently not an impediment to claiming self-defense
Or... the trial evidence illustrated that said 'stalking' was neither an initiation nor an escalation of conflict and therefore did not invalidate a legitimate claim of self-defense.
So exactly what i said. Stalking someone doesn't prevent you from claiming self defense
If a given "stalking" neither initiates nor escalates a conflict, how does it necessarily invalidate a legitimate claim of self-defense?
 
Railroaded? People questioned why an unarmed 17 year old was killed by someone who isn't a cop.

Now later news stories are bringing into question his mental stability. This guy is a ticking time bomb.

He was railroaded, they knew the facts and still tried to prosecute and we told you all they would never get a conviction

No. His acquittal was due to nobody but Zimmerman knowing the facts. There was not enough evidence. He wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty.
We have had this discussion, ONE IS INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY. Thus not guilty PROVES they are INNOCENT.
"Not guilty" proves no such thing. :rolleyes: "Not guilty" affirms the prosecution did not prove their charges.
Innocent until proven guilty.
Not proven guilty = innocent.
:dunno:
:rolleyes: just like OJ
 
Railroaded? People questioned why an unarmed 17 year old was killed by someone who isn't a cop.

Now later news stories are bringing into question his mental stability. This guy is a ticking time bomb.

He was railroaded, they knew the facts and still tried to prosecute and we told you all they would never get a conviction

No. His acquittal was due to nobody but Zimmerman knowing the facts. There was not enough evidence. He wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty.
We have had this discussion, ONE IS INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY. Thus not guilty PROVES they are INNOCENT.
"Not guilty" proves no such thing. :rolleyes: "Not guilty" affirms the prosecution did not prove their charges.
Innocent until proven guilty.
Not proven guilty = innocent.
:dunno:


Except if you're Black.

If Black, cops can shoot you down in the street and slime like gz can get away with stalking, harassing and killing an unarmed kid.

Sooner or later, gz WILL pay for his crimes and in some ways, he is paying for them now.
 
Sounds like this Matthew Apperson is a deranged liberal who is obsessed with dealing out his own brand of 'social justice' to GZ.

Being cheered on by the likes of the USMB Assclown Brigade no doubt.
 
Sounds like this Matthew Apperson is a deranged liberal who is obsessed with dealing out his own brand of 'social justice' to GZ.

Being cheered on by the likes of the USMB Assclown Brigade no doubt.
Why wouldn't you cheer him? He used his gun in self-defense. doesn't that make him a right-wing hero, or is that only the case if he uses it to kill an unarmed black kid?
 
He was railroaded, they knew the facts and still tried to prosecute and we told you all they would never get a conviction

No. His acquittal was due to nobody but Zimmerman knowing the facts. There was not enough evidence. He wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty.
We have had this discussion, ONE IS INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY. Thus not guilty PROVES they are INNOCENT.
"Not guilty" proves no such thing. :rolleyes: "Not guilty" affirms the prosecution did not prove their charges.
Innocent until proven guilty.
Not proven guilty = innocent.
:dunno:


Except if you're Black.

If Black, cops can shoot you down in the street and slime like gz can get away with stalking, harassing and killing an unarmed kid.

Sooner or later, gz WILL pay for his crimes and in some ways, he is paying for them now.

A jury of his peers found him not guilty because Trayvon attacked him and he used his gun in self defense.

Too bad, so sad that the young punk picked the wrong person to beat up.

THAT is why Martin is six feet under and Zimmerman is above ground today.
 
Sounds like this Matthew Apperson is a deranged liberal who is obsessed with dealing out his own brand of 'social justice' to GZ.

Being cheered on by the likes of the USMB Assclown Brigade no doubt.

I've been trying to figure out which poster he is.

:lol:
 

About time someone took a shot at that piece of shit.

That's really fucked up Delta. Totally fucked up.

He's a violent antisocial personality type with guns. Public's better off if he's behind bars or dead.
He's not anti-social. He had a lot of friends testify for him. Your accusations is flawed. And he has evrry right to carry a gun.
 
he is a whack job leftist whack job ta boot


jon_berzerk has seen his voting record.

:rolleyes:




the odds are running that he is a leftist


First you state is he a "leftist".

Now you say "odds are".

IOW, you are making it up as you go along.

:eusa_liar: :eusa_naughty: :eusa_liar: :eusa_naughty:


Edit

jon_berzerk

agrees with nutter tinydancer that "his neighbors say he's off the rails.

Does that mean that jon_berzerk also knows the neighbors personally?

Or, is it just more lies from both of them?

:eusa_liar: :eusa_naughty: :eusa_liar: :eusa_naughty:

.

Good morning luddly.

Ryan Hughes of WFTV. reported this tidbit of the dead squirrel throwing in yard crazy.
Now the t-dancer has him "throwing" a dead squirrel.

You sure like to make up shit - don't you?

All that was said was the neighbor believed he left a dead squirrel there.

How do we know how sane she is?

Seems like everybody is fucked up in Florida to start with.
What about all his other arrests? Did you see his whacked out behavior during the press conference. He was relishinging in the spotlight while having abnormal head movements.
 

Sooooooooooo, the Prosecution sabotaged its own case against Zimmerman?

Or were these witnesses like the Ferguson "hands up don't shoot honest to goodness really that's what happened" kind of witnesses?

Because it makes no sense whatsoever that if the Prosecution had reliable witnesses that would have put Zimmerman behind bars for the rest of his life, that they would not have called them.
 

Sooooooooooo, the Prosecution sabotaged its own case against Zimmerman?

Or were these witnesses like the Ferguson "hands up don't shoot honest to goodness really that's what happened" kind of witnesses?

Because it makes no sense whatsoever that if the Prosecution had reliable witnesses that would have put Zimmerman behind bars for the rest of his life, that they would not have called them.

The case should have never went to trial
 

Forum List

Back
Top