The jury and the evidence did not find that Trayvon attacked anyone.Innocent until proven guilty."Not guilty" proves no such thing.We have had this discussion, ONE IS INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY. Thus not guilty PROVES they are INNOCENT.No. His acquittal was due to nobody but Zimmerman knowing the facts. There was not enough evidence. He wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty."Not guilty" affirms the prosecution did not prove their charges.
Not proven guilty = innocent.
![]()
Except if you're Black.
If Black, cops can shoot you down in the street and slime like gz can get away with stalking, harassing and killing an unarmed kid.
Sooner or later, gz WILL pay for his crimes and in some ways, he is paying for them now.
A jury of his peers found him not guilty because Trayvon attacked him and he used his gun in self defense.
Too bad, so sad that the young punk picked the wrong person to beat up.
THAT is why Martin is six feet under and Zimmerman is above ground today.