ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,540
- 54,334
- 3,615
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry to hear that. It must be because trumps lawyers were lying about the "evidence" they had collected from idiots like you. Did you submit any?The courts refused to hear evidence.
You do not decide what lies are or does the MSM or lying politicians.Wrong. You have assumptions that you call facts. That makes them lies
I have explained that. I do not care if you like my explanation or not.What bluff, FruitLoops? True the Vote compelled Raffensperger to launch an investigation into crimes of ballot harvesting based on their claims.
Why is True the Vote flat out refusing to cooperate? Don't they want ballot harvesters prosecuted? What was the point of collating all of that data and even making a movie about it, if not to go after the criminals they claim they found?
Seems the one bluffing, about having evidence of ballot harvesting, is True the Vote.
![]()
I have explained that. I do not care if you like my explanation or not.
Because those authorities want their sources. They were jailed for not revealing them. Try and keep up.Your excuses don't hold water in light of True the Vote not cooperating with the authorities they complained to.
Those two Black Panthers.....Hilarious
Dude, the fact that you brought those two guys up from 20 years ago show who holds racist views.Of course they're hilarious, to racist vermin like yourself. We already know that.
Correct, I do not decide. Lies are just lies. Easy to point out which I will continue to do when you present your assumptions as factYou do not decide what lies are or does the MSM or lying politicians.
When what you say is only backed by proven liars it is none of my concern.Correct, I do not decide. Lies are just lies. Easy to point out which I will continue to do when you present your assumptions as fact
that's a shame.The swing state synchronized shutdown in the dead of the night was the fatal blow.
Because those authorities want their sources. They were jailed for not revealing them. Try and keep up.
There sure is. They need someone to expose this crap and they do not have to tell anyone who they are. Remember they were jailed and released and no source was revealed.There's no reason not to give them their sources. They claim those sources broke the law. They claim they know that. That's not very different from harboring a fugitive.
For example? Quote meWhen what you say is only backed by proven liars it is none of my concern.
The 2020 was not stolen. Have you said that?For example? Quote me
I don’t believe I’ve said that. If I did it was a misstatement. I’ve definitely said that it’s absurd to claim it was stolen without evidence to back up such a dangerous and outrageous claimThe 2020 was not stolen. Have you said that?
Then you think it was stolen? You cannot have it both ways. You have just lost the argument.I don’t believe I’ve said that. If I did it was a misstatement. I’ve definitely said that it’s absurd to claim it was stolen without evidence to back up such a dangerous and outrageous claim
There sure is. They need someone to expose this crap and they do not have to tell anyone who they are. Remember they were jailed and released and no source was revealed.
After spending nearly a week in jail, Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips — leaders of Texas-based right-wing voting activist group True the Vote — have been released. They’d been held for contempt of court since Halloween, having repeatedly refused to release the name of a man they called a “confidential FBI informant” who is a person of interest in a defamation and hacking case against them.
The person remains unidentified.
![]()
Federal appeals court releases True the Vote leaders from jail
True the Vote’s lawyers appealed a contempt order by federal district Judge Kenneth Hoyt to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, arguing the finding was in error and the pair should be released.www.texastribune.org
How do they know the person is a criminal if they do not know who that person is? This should be good.Of course they have to say who it is. If you know someone who committed a crime and law enforcement, or in this case a court, learns you know someone who committed a crime, you have to tell them what you know. You're not allowed to hide a criminal.
How do they know the person is a criminal if they do not know who that person is? This should be good.