German utilities closing fossil fuel power plants - can't compete with renewables

You know why no one talks about it?

b/c nothing happened

If they did talk about it, liberals and fools would be faced with undeniable facts that they are WRONG again.

You dumb ass. If the pool goes critical, quite literally, millions of people will be in danger of dying. Not only in Japan, but there will be fallout here on the West Coast. This is an extroidinery situation, one frought with danger for everyone on this planet.

But people like you would have said that nothing like this was possible prior to this situation. Not only that, we have cooling pools here in the US that have three times the number of rods in them that they were designed for. A New Madrid type quake could very well test our ability to contain a nuclear accident of this very type.

SNIFFFFF AHHHH

I love the smell of ignorance in the evening.
Are you sniffing your own pitts and crotch again, TooDumbs, or does that scent of ignorance just flow directly out of your ears?

BTW, do you get paid to stooge for the nuclear industry or are you just so brainwashed and retarded that you do it for free?




Tell me; How many nuclear accidents have occurred in the US?

hint; if you get too one finger, you're already wrong

but FEAR is your only ally!!!!

In your case, TooDumbs, ignorance, misinformation and rank stupidity seem to be your only allies.

Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents at nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1] Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2]

Context

Globally, there have been at least 99 (civilian and military) recorded nuclear reactor accidents from 1952 to 2009 (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage, the amount the US federal government uses to define major energy accidents that must be reported), totaling US$20.5 billion in property damages. The accidents involved meltdowns, explosions, fires, and loss of coolant, and occurred during both normal operation and extreme emergency conditions (such as droughts and earthquakes). Property damage costs include destruction of property, emergency response, environmental remediation, evacuation, lost product, fines, and court claims.[2] Because nuclear reactors are large and complex accidents onsite tend to be relatively expensive.[3]

At least 56 nuclear reactor accidents have occurred in the USA. Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2] The most serious of these U.S. accidents was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Davis-Besse has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1]

The United States General Accountability Office reported more than 150 incidents from 2001 to 2006 alone of nuclear plants not performing within acceptable safety guidelines. In 2006, it said: "Since 2001, the ROP has resulted in more than 4,000 inspection findings concerning nuclear power plant licensees’ failure to fully comply with NRC regulations and industry standards for safe plant operation, and NRC has subjected more than 75 percent (79) of the 103 operating plants to increased oversight for varying periods".[4] Seventy-one percent of all recorded major nuclear accidents, including meltdowns, explosions, fires, and loss of coolants, occurred in the United States, and they happened during both normal operations as well as emergency situations such as floods, droughts, and earthquakes.[5]

History

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 encouraged private corporations in the United States to build nuclear reactors and a significant learning phase followed with many early partial core meltdowns and accidents at experimental reactors and research facilities.[6] This led to the introduction of the Price-Anderson Act in 1957, which was "an implicit admission that nuclear power provided risks that producers were unwilling to assume without federal backing".[6]

Nuclear reactor accidents continued into the 1960s with a small test reactor exploding at the Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One in Idaho Falls in January 1961 resulting in three deaths which were the first fatalities in the history of U.S. nuclear reactor operations.[7] There was also a partial meltdown at the Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station in Michigan in 1966.[6]

The large size of nuclear reactors ordered during the late 1960s raised new safety questions and created fears of a severe reactor accident that would send large quantities of radiation into the environment. In the early 1970s, a highly contentious debate over the performance of emergency core cooling systems in nuclear plants, designed to prevent a core meltdown that could lead to the "China syndrome", received coverage in the popular media and technical journals.[8][9]

In 1976, four nuclear engineers -- three from GE and one from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission—resigned, stating that nuclear power was not as safe as their superiors were claiming.[10][11] These men were engineers who had spent most of their working life building reactors,[12][13] and they testified to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy that:
"the cumulative effect of all design defects and deficiencies in the design, construction and operations of nuclear power plants makes a nuclear power plant accident, in our opinion, a certain event. The only question is when, and where."[10]

Three Mile Island accident

On March 28, 1979, equipment failures and operator error contributed to loss of coolant and a partial core meltdown of Unit 2's pressurized water reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. [14] The scope and complexity of this reactor accident became clear over the course of five days, as a number of agencies at the local, state and federal levels tried to solve the problem and decide whether the ongoing accident required an emergency evacuation, and to what extent.

Cleanup started in August 1979 and officially ended in December 1993, with a total cleanup cost of about $1 billion.[15] Benjamin K. Sovacool, in his 2007 preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, estimated that the TMI accident caused a total of $2.4 billion in property damages.[16] The health effects of the Three Mile Island accident are widely, but not universally, agreed to be very low level.[17][18]

The TMI accident forced regulatory and operational improvements on a reluctant industry, but it also increased opposition to nuclear power.[19] The accident triggered protests around the world.[20]

List of accidents and incidents
(go to source Wiki article for list)
 
It's not about "renewables". That's the left wing spin on the issue. There isn't much in the way of oil exploration in Germany and nobody in their right mind would suggest that Germany runs on windmills and acres of solar panels. It's all about nuclear energy.

Why do you bother opening your mouth, witless&ball-less, when you don't know anything? Typical rightwingnut., I suppose.

Germany Becomes World’s Renewable Energy’s Grand Champion
by Morris Beschloss
August 6th, 2013
(excerpts)
Having decided to shut off its nuclear reactors by 2022, along with further slashing greenhouse gas emissions, Germany requires of its population the world’s most ambitious renewable energy expansion. Last year, Germany generated 22% of its electricity from renewable sources, up from only 8% a decade ago. This is twice as much as has been achieved by the U.S., the United Kingdom, or Japan. Germany’s goals, under its “energy evolution” is to generate at least 35% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020, and at least 80% by mid-century. Berlin hopes to make this happen, while cutting its total energy consumption in half by 2050.

A part of Germany’s success is that small-scale energy producers are dominating the growth of Germany’s renewable energy sector. Households with solar panels, already profuse throughout Germany, and farms proficient in bio-fuel conversion, account for 35% of the country’s renewable energy supply. Another 25% is contributed by the producers of green energy, such as ethanol and geothermal. The recent history of Germany’s zeal for the use of solar and wind power, in a nation that has far less availability to those elements than other nations with more plentiful natural capability, arise out of a desire to shed nuclear energy, especially after the Chernobyl disaster of the 1980′s, and the Japanese Fukushima catastrophe in early 2011. Although instigated under Socialist Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, and now implemented by Conservative successor Angela Merkel, Germany will be totally nixing nuclear energy in the next decade. This is based on Germany’s traditional record of successfully achieving its economic goals.
 
Last edited:
I read in another thread that Germany is building 20 new coal fired plants. Something about the fact that in the winter the sun doesn't shine enough to power their green grid.
You can read a lot of bullshit and lying propaganda on this forum, mostly posted by ignorant brainwashed rightwingnut retards like you. Too bad you're so gullible.
 
I read in another thread that Germany is building 20 new coal fired plants. Something about the fact that in the winter the sun doesn't shine enough to power their green grid.
You can read a lot of bullshit and lying propaganda on this forum, mostly posted by ignorant brainwashed rightwingnut retards like you. Too bad you're so gullible.

I provided the links, the liar or dumb ass would be you.
 
You dumb ass. If the pool goes critical, quite literally, millions of people will be in danger of dying. Not only in Japan, but there will be fallout here on the West Coast. This is an extroidinery situation, one frought with danger for everyone on this planet.

But people like you would have said that nothing like this was possible prior to this situation. Not only that, we have cooling pools here in the US that have three times the number of rods in them that they were designed for. A New Madrid type quake could very well test our ability to contain a nuclear accident of this very type.

SNIFFFFF AHHHH

I love the smell of ignorance in the evening.
Are you sniffing your own pitts and crotch again, TooDumbs, or does that scent of ignorance just flow directly out of your ears?

BTW, do you get paid to stooge for the nuclear industry or are you just so brainwashed and retarded that you do it for free?




Tell me; How many nuclear accidents have occurred in the US?

hint; if you get too one finger, you're already wrong

but FEAR is your only ally!!!!

In your case, TooDumbs, ignorance, misinformation and rank stupidity seem to be your only allies.

Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents at nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1] Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2]

Context

Globally, there have been at least 99 (civilian and military) recorded nuclear reactor accidents from 1952 to 2009 (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage, the amount the US federal government uses to define major energy accidents that must be reported), totaling US$20.5 billion in property damages. The accidents involved meltdowns, explosions, fires, and loss of coolant, and occurred during both normal operation and extreme emergency conditions (such as droughts and earthquakes). Property damage costs include destruction of property, emergency response, environmental remediation, evacuation, lost product, fines, and court claims.[2] Because nuclear reactors are large and complex accidents onsite tend to be relatively expensive.[3]

At least 56 nuclear reactor accidents have occurred in the USA. Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2] The most serious of these U.S. accidents was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Davis-Besse has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1]

The United States General Accountability Office reported more than 150 incidents from 2001 to 2006 alone of nuclear plants not performing within acceptable safety guidelines. In 2006, it said: "Since 2001, the ROP has resulted in more than 4,000 inspection findings concerning nuclear power plant licensees’ failure to fully comply with NRC regulations and industry standards for safe plant operation, and NRC has subjected more than 75 percent (79) of the 103 operating plants to increased oversight for varying periods".[4] Seventy-one percent of all recorded major nuclear accidents, including meltdowns, explosions, fires, and loss of coolants, occurred in the United States, and they happened during both normal operations as well as emergency situations such as floods, droughts, and earthquakes.[5]

History

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 encouraged private corporations in the United States to build nuclear reactors and a significant learning phase followed with many early partial core meltdowns and accidents at experimental reactors and research facilities.[6] This led to the introduction of the Price-Anderson Act in 1957, which was "an implicit admission that nuclear power provided risks that producers were unwilling to assume without federal backing".[6]

Nuclear reactor accidents continued into the 1960s with a small test reactor exploding at the Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One in Idaho Falls in January 1961 resulting in three deaths which were the first fatalities in the history of U.S. nuclear reactor operations.[7] There was also a partial meltdown at the Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station in Michigan in 1966.[6]

The large size of nuclear reactors ordered during the late 1960s raised new safety questions and created fears of a severe reactor accident that would send large quantities of radiation into the environment. In the early 1970s, a highly contentious debate over the performance of emergency core cooling systems in nuclear plants, designed to prevent a core meltdown that could lead to the "China syndrome", received coverage in the popular media and technical journals.[8][9]

In 1976, four nuclear engineers -- three from GE and one from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission—resigned, stating that nuclear power was not as safe as their superiors were claiming.[10][11] These men were engineers who had spent most of their working life building reactors,[12][13] and they testified to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy that:
"the cumulative effect of all design defects and deficiencies in the design, construction and operations of nuclear power plants makes a nuclear power plant accident, in our opinion, a certain event. The only question is when, and where."[10]

Three Mile Island accident

On March 28, 1979, equipment failures and operator error contributed to loss of coolant and a partial core meltdown of Unit 2's pressurized water reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. [14] The scope and complexity of this reactor accident became clear over the course of five days, as a number of agencies at the local, state and federal levels tried to solve the problem and decide whether the ongoing accident required an emergency evacuation, and to what extent.

Cleanup started in August 1979 and officially ended in December 1993, with a total cleanup cost of about $1 billion.[15] Benjamin K. Sovacool, in his 2007 preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, estimated that the TMI accident caused a total of $2.4 billion in property damages.[16] The health effects of the Three Mile Island accident are widely, but not universally, agreed to be very low level.[17][18]

The TMI accident forced regulatory and operational improvements on a reluctant industry, but it also increased opposition to nuclear power.[19] The accident triggered protests around the world.[20]

List of accidents and incidents
(go to source Wiki article for list)

so in 70 years you found 52 accidents


does the fact that you're an idiot just dawn on you? do you now know nuclear is the safest?
It even kills fewer birds than solar.


damn son, pwned by your own fear
 
I love these threads......provides the opportunity to paint the warmist radicals as being completely off the reservation......

Here we have the alarmist version of reality >>>>>








Heres is the actual future of energy >>>>






chart-energy-2040-2.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]


EIA-annual-outlook-2011-2040.png
[/URL][/IMG]


2035generation.gif
[/URL][/IMG]



rennix-640_s640x427.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]






 
Fossil fuels don't get the influx of government money that renewables do right now.

Just wait until all that tax payer money stops rolling in and see what happens to the price.
 
Fossil fuels don't get the influx of government money that renewables do right now.

Just wait until all that tax payer money stops rolling in and see what happens to the price.

I hope the German utilities are aware of that. Perhaps you should warn them.
 
You know why no one talks about it?

b/c nothing happened

If they did talk about it, liberals and fools would be faced with undeniable facts that they are WRONG again.

You dumb ass. If the pool goes critical, quite literally, millions of people will be in danger of dying. Not only in Japan, but there will be fallout here on the West Coast. This is an extroidinery situation, one frought with danger for everyone on this planet.

But people like you would have said that nothing like this was possible prior to this situation. Not only that, we have cooling pools here in the US that have three times the number of rods in them that they were designed for. A New Madrid type quake could very well test our ability to contain a nuclear accident of this very type.

SNIFFFFF AHHHH

I love the smell of ignorance in the evening.

Tell me; How many nuclear accidents have occurred in the US?


hint; if you get too one finger, you're already wrong




but

FEAR is your only ally!!!!

I do not oppose Nuke power, but I do object to BULLSHIT so...

According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents at nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1] Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2]

Who among us does NOT remember (or at least know of) THREE MILE ISLAND

Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
The Navy had a steam explosion at a prototype reactor in Idaho many years ago. There were three casualties.

And I would like to emphasize my Thanks to poster Editec. Taking down bullshit should be our highest calling (on this board anyway).

And just to keep things open: I am in favor of nuclear power.
 
Last edited:
You dumb ass. If the pool goes critical, quite literally, millions of people will be in danger of dying. Not only in Japan, but there will be fallout here on the West Coast. This is an extroidinery situation, one frought with danger for everyone on this planet.

But people like you would have said that nothing like this was possible prior to this situation. Not only that, we have cooling pools here in the US that have three times the number of rods in them that they were designed for. A New Madrid type quake could very well test our ability to contain a nuclear accident of this very type.

SNIFFFFF AHHHH

I love the smell of ignorance in the evening.

Tell me; How many nuclear accidents have occurred in the US?


hint; if you get too one finger, you're already wrong




but

FEAR is your only ally!!!!

I do not oppose Nuke power, but I do object to BULLSHIT so...

According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents at nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979.[1] Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.[2]

Who among us does NOT remember (or at least know of) THREE MILE ISLAND

Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Three Mile Island is a testament to the robustness of US reactor designs. The people running it did the wrong things for 12 hours or so and the reactor still did not 1) explode or 2) release significant amounts of radiation into the environment.

Yes, the reactor was ruined, and they had to release some radiated steam, but no core material was ever ejected from the structure, and no contaminated water was lost from the area.
 
The Navy had a steam explosion at a prototype reactor in Idaho many years ago. There were casualties.

And I would like to emphasize my Thanks to poster Editec. Taking down bullshit should be our highest calling (on this board anyway).

If the steam explosion was not in the radiated wate loop, then it is nothing more than a standard industrial accident.
 
The Navy had a steam explosion at a prototype reactor in Idaho many years ago. There were casualties.

And I would like to emphasize my Thanks to poster Editec. Taking down bullshit should be our highest calling (on this board anyway).

If the steam explosion was not in the radiated wate loop, then it is nothing more than a standard industrial accident.

The explosion was in the core.
 
A jammed control rod suddenly sprang free causing the reactor to go supercritical with insufficient cooling. The core exploded. Contamination of the immediate area was severe.
 
A jammed control rod suddenly sprang free causing the reactor to go supercritical with insufficient cooling. The core exploded. Contamination of the immediate area was severe.

Is this the one from the 1960's? If so, how does that relate to more modern full scale reactors, which is the crux of the accident discussion?
 
A jammed control rod suddenly sprang free causing the reactor to go supercritical with insufficient cooling. The core exploded. Contamination of the immediate area was severe.

Is this the one from the 1960's? If so, how does that relate to more modern full scale reactors, which is the crux of the accident discussion?

Full scale reactors are a thing of the past.

The new modular reactors are self limiting and don't need millions of gallons of water for cooling.

They can be buried underground and are therefore much more secure and they can be plugged into existing power generating plants.
 
A jammed control rod suddenly sprang free causing the reactor to go supercritical with insufficient cooling. The core exploded. Contamination of the immediate area was severe.

Is this the one from the 1960's? If so, how does that relate to more modern full scale reactors, which is the crux of the accident discussion?

Full scale reactors are a thing of the past.

The new modular reactors are self limiting and don't need millions of gallons of water for cooling.

They can be buried underground and are therefore much more secure and they can be plugged into existing power generating plants.

Anti-nuclear people will find something wrong with those as well, count on it, as most of thier opposition is based on emotion, not on reason.
 
A jammed control rod suddenly sprang free causing the reactor to go supercritical with insufficient cooling. The core exploded. Contamination of the immediate area was severe.

Is this the one from the 1960's? If so, how does that relate to more modern full scale reactors, which is the crux of the accident discussion?

It is from the 60s and was a prototype. It had almost nothing in common with modern reactors. I brought it up in response to your comment above that there had been zero nuclear accidents in the United States.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top