Germany's Response to New US Sanctions Against Russia

Alexandre Fedorovski

Gold Member
Dec 9, 2017
2,536
1,163
210
It seems that the differences in the foreign policy courses of the US and Germany - the country with the strongest economy in Europe - continue to deepen.

It is known that the United States is trying to isolate Russia, for which the gas and oil industries are budget-forming, and to prevent the construction of the second stage of the Northern Stream, forcing Europe to buy American liquefied gas, which will be at least twice as expensive as the Russian one.

A day after the publication by the US Treasury a sanctions list against the Russian government, financiers and industrialists, the German company Nord Stream 2 AG announced the permission to lay the pipeline in German territorial waters.

The Nord Stream 2 project company is 100% owned by Russian Gazprom, but supported financially by five European energy companies: Austria’s OMV, France’s Engie, Germany’s Uniper and Wintershall, and Anglo-Dutch Shell.

The whole situation around the Nord Stream 2 has already caused a strong dispute between these 5 countries and the pro-American cryptoneozionist European Commission, watchdog of the EU treaties, which is throwing everything it has at Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline across the Baltic Sea to Germany. The lawyers of the five countries sent a protest to the European Commission several weeks ago against its attempts to block the construction.

This fact gives hope that international cryptoneozionism is not a monolithic structure in which internal contradictions exist and sometimes sharply exacerbate, allowing to neutralize the harmful impact of this phenomenon on the international economy and politics. Or its impact on individual countries is not dominant...

upload_2018-2-1_13-27-29.jpeg
 
Last edited:
="iceberg, post: 19185345, member: 63397"]great. let the immigrants build it.

AF: Yes, of course, but, unfortunately, these people, especially from the "Black Continent", are not at all inclined to work. I know this environment well, and I do not understand what the German government is thinking ... Mexicans flee to America to work, these are not ... More than 90 percent of African women arrive in Germany being pregnant. Some Africans, like the Arabs, manage to establish a network for the distribution of drugs already in the camps for asylum seekers. Thieves flourish ...

images
 
It seems that the differences in the foreign policy courses of the US and Germany - the country with the strongest economy in Europe - continue to deepen.

It is known that the United States is trying to isolate Russia, for which the gas and oil industries are budget-forming, and to prevent the construction of the second stage of the Northern Stream, forcing Europe to buy American liquefied gas, which will be at least twice as expensive as the Russian one.

A day after the publication by the US Treasury a sanctions list against the Russian government, financiers and industrialists, the German company Nord Stream 2 AG announced the permission to lay the pipeline in German territorial waters.

The Nord Stream 2 project company is 100% owned by Russian Gazprom, but supported financially by five European energy companies: Austria’s OMV, France’s Engie, Germany’s Uniper and Wintershall, and Anglo-Dutch Shell.

The whole situation around the Nord Stream 2 has already caused a strong dispute between these 5 countries and the pro-American cryptoneozionist European Commission, watchdog of the EU treaties, which is throwing everything it has at Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline across the Baltic Sea to Germany. The lawyers of the five countries sent a protest to the European Commission several weeks ago against its attempts to block the construction.

This fact gives hope that international cryptoneozionism is not a monolithic structure in which internal contradictions exist and sometimes sharply exacerbate, allowing to neutralize the harmful impact of this phenomenon on the international economy and politics. Or its impact on individual countries is not dominant...

View attachment 174194
fossil fuels are simply that; some on the left believe in prioritizing renewable energies over fossil fuels.

advances in technologies are providing the profit motive.
 

Forum List

Back
Top