BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

[tahuyaman]

What difference does that make? All are supposed to be equal under the law.

Is that you Hillary?

 

[Rawley]

True, but he was an American citizen, and he was executed and thanks to the SCOTUS Obama will never have to answer as to why.



All Biden has to do is declare him a terrorist and then killing him would be part of his official duties.

And he'd just have to declare the teenager a terrorist as he rapes and strangles her on the Resolute desk. DO you think through this nonsense before you post it?

Were done. Have a blessed day

 

[gipper]

That is not what these folks want. It dismays me that they want their ruling class above the law, but they have proven that is indeed what they desire.

No different on the D side. This is the way of the duopoly.

In fact, Genocide Joe may be the most corrupt potus ever. It’s appalling what the establishment has done to elevate this worthless dumb warmonger to potus. The lies and fraud they committed are blatant, yet without consequences.

We live in a failed state run by a secret cabal of psychopathic elites.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And he'd just have to declare the teenager a terrorist as he rapes and strangles her on the Resolute desk. DO you think through this nonsense before you post it?

There is no law that allows anyone to rape someone for being a terrorist.

Are you really this stupid?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No different on the D side. This is the way of the duopoly.

100% correct.

We live in a failed state run by a secret cabal of psychopathic elites.

I am working on my escape plan.

 

[pknopp]

There is no law that allows anyone to rape someone for being a terrorist.

Are you really this stupid?

There was no law that allowed a president target an American citizen for assassination either.

Well, not a U.S. law. Obama had to turn to International law supposedly.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There was no law that allowed a president target an American citizen for assassination either.

Well, not a U.S. law. Obama had to turn to International law supposedly.

There are laws that allow for the killing of someone seen as an imminent danger.

There are no laws that allow for the raping of someone seen as an imminent danger.

 

[pknopp]

There are laws that allow for the killing of someone seen as an imminent danger.

And oddly Obama couldn't come up with one.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And oddly Obama couldn't come up with one.

and now thanks to the SCOTUS he, and any future POTUS, never will need to.

 

[Rawley]

There is no law that allows anyone to rape someone for being a terrorist.

Why not, you claim he's above the law.

Are you really this stupid?

Are you really this much of an A-hole?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why not, you claim he's above the law.

Only when doing "official actions". Rape is not an official action, killing enemies (or having them killed) is

Are you really this much of an A-hole?

Yes, I am. And you really are that stupid.