Supreme Court To Take Up Trump Immunity Case...In Late April

[Independentthinker]

Trump’s legal strategy is not to defend himself. It is to delay. This plays right into his strategy. I was hoping for better from the Supreme Court. Why? I have no idea. They have shown us who they are.

Dark days indeed.

Supreme Court to take up Trump's Immunity...in late April.

This is bad news for the voters of America. The Supreme Court has slow rolled this decision. They could have simply accepted the Appellate Court’s extremely strong ruling that he of course is not immune from all accountability for breaking laws while...

www.dailykos.com

Translation: You're for giving Trump a fair trial, after which he will be found guilty and sentenced.

 

[rightwinger]

Translation: You're for giving Trump a fair trial, after which he will be found guilty and sentenced.

Trump will be tried by a Jury of his peers with the best representation money can buy

 

[justoffal]

So in turn Trump, Bush, Bush Sr., Clinton, Reagan etc etc would all be open to lawsuits?

I am not a lawyer so I would like to pick your legal acumen. What would the charge be?

That is correct

 

[Independentthinker]

Trump will be tried by a Jury of his peers with the best representation money can buy

Well, we have weaponized law enforcement, kangaroo investigations by politically motivated prosecutors, with kangaroo judges and kangaroo juries, if there is even a jury at all.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Translation: You're for giving Trump a fair trial, after which he will be found guilty and sentenced.

Yes, that's what it means, when you think someone is guilty of the crimes.

Is this just now occurring to you?

Yes, it appears Trump will be convicted on the evidence.

 

[Independentthinker]

Yes, that's what it means, when you think someone is guilty of the crimes.

Is this just now occurring to you?

Yes, it appears Trump will be convicted on the evidence.

Thanks for the explanation. Otherwise, I would have never guessed you thought Trump was guilty.

 

[Mac1958]

How strange that the SCOTUS could merely have examined the exact same arguments from the lower case and instead waited weeks to decide to wait two more months to then have a re-do.

How strange indeed.

Given the makeup of the court.....

Imagine the notion that a President is not accountable. That's just where we are now.

 

[Care4all]

Well, we have weaponized law enforcement, kangaroo investigations by politically motivated prosecutors, with kangaroo judges and kangaroo juries, if there is even a jury at all.

You pressed the EASY BUTTON!

Maybe you should take 'thinker' out of your user ID name?

 

[justoffal]

Given the makeup of the court.....

Imagine the notion that a President is not accountable. That's just where we are now.

Better hope it stays that way.
Goose<>Gander....the left is always unprepared for the changes that follow absolutism.
Monica will be suing Bill, Solyndra investors will drag Obama's ass into civil Court...
Iraqi nationals will have Bush up on charges.....

 

[SweetSue92]

Given the makeup of the court.....

Imagine the notion that a President is not accountable. That's just where we are now.

Read the Constitution

 

[JoeB131]

Biden threw the border open. The numbers are 8+ million in a little over three years. No one is buying what you're selling.

Your illogic about the gun industry is typical of how leftoids divert from the facts in front of them.

If your logic is that if we had no undocumented aliens, we'd have fewer murders, then it follows that if we had no guns, we'd have fewer murders.

Of course, 19,500 murders happen with guns and only about 60 are committed by undocumented aliens... so which do you think is the bigger problem?

 

[Catsnmeters]

That is correct

The charge?

 

[justoffal]

The charge?

Oh....Geezus....take your pick

 

[Catsnmeters]

Oh....Geezus....take your pick

You would be incorrect.

"But Paul Coggins, a former U.S. attorney in Texas, said there’s already well-established precedent that federal officials, including the president, are immune from prosecution for good-faith decisions they make while engaged in official business.

“Stealing an election,” Coggins said, wouldn’t fall into that category."

Trump warns of 'Pandora's box' of perpetual presidential prosecutions if charges against him stand

Donald Trump is warning that other ex-presidents could be prosecuted if criminal charges against him aren't dropped.

apnews.com

 

[justoffal]

You would be incorrect.

"But Paul Coggins, a former U.S. attorney in Texas, said there’s already well-established precedent that federal officials, including the president, are immune from prosecution for good-faith decisions they make while engaged in official business.

“Stealing an election,” Coggins said, wouldn’t fall into that category."

Trump warns of 'Pandora's box' of perpetual presidential prosecutions if charges against him stand

Donald Trump is warning that other ex-presidents could be prosecuted if criminal charges against him aren't dropped.

apnews.com

YAWWWWWN....... desperate parsing.....

 

[Catsnmeters]

YAWWWWWN....... desperate parsing.....

You think judicial precedent is boring?

This may be the wrong thread for you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Thanks for the explanation. Otherwise, I would have never guessed you thought Trump was guilty.

Hey, you seemed to think you were calling someone out to accuse them of thinking like a normal, decent american.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Better hope it stays that way.
Goose<>Gander....the left is always unprepared for the changes that follow absolutism.
Monica will be suing Bill, Solyndra investors will drag Obama's ass into civil Court...
Iraqi nationals will have Bush up on charges.....

I think some paid right wing liar is fooling you again.

Trump was sued while he was President. Bill Barr wanted to be his personal attorney, in the case.


Biden is being sued right now.

What's your next threat? The sun rising in the east tomorrow?

 

[Marener]

Read the Constitution

The constitution doesn’t say the president has immunity from prosecution.

 

[Dagosa]

Trump’s legal strategy is not to defend himself. It is to delay. This plays right into his strategy. I was hoping for better from the Supreme Court. Why? I have no idea. They have shown us who they are.

Dark days indeed.

Supreme Court to take up Trump's Immunity...in late April.

This is bad news for the voters of America. The Supreme Court has slow rolled this decision. They could have simply accepted the Appellate Court’s extremely strong ruling that he of course is not immune from all accountability for breaking laws while...

www.dailykos.com

Just like all the other instances, he has support of the GOP…..