Gitmo prisoner who NEVER stood trial finally released

So for 50 years we deal with them? How?

By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.

So you don't know how to stop them. I'll clue you in, you can't.


So, if you can't stop them all the time, then you might just want to make sure they don't target you then.

The Latin Americans don't have a problem with ISIS, do they? They don't need to stop ISIS. Why?

The State Department says Islamic terrorist groups are penetrating the Latin America region. Did you know this?
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Trump won't end it.

He made a "suggestion" that this could happen. It's not his policy.
He can't.
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Hmm ISIS and AQ... 2 groups who fight with weapons we gave them. Sure let's go back in there. I wonder what the next crazy group to pop up will be afterwards? What we don't have to wonder about... is who they will have gotten their weapons from.

No, apparently we are too busy wasting our time using our troops as advisors to the Iraqi military there. If you are looking for where you may find possible weapons filtering in, try Iran as we seem to have reduced sanctions there in seeing them as being less of a threat.
Let us rewind to the 50's when the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran and helped a brutal dictator come to power...fast forward 20 years and the revolution happens....again the US should have stayed out because its a completely different world over there and it causes US nothing but problems in the long run.


You need to "rewind" centuries to find the beginning of Islamic terrorism
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Yes. The countries in the ME aren't the ones invading the US and propping up dictators here and meddling in our affairs. Its more than just leaving its leaving the whole damn area alone. When our country is in such horrible disarray there shouldn't be time to dick off meddling in another countries affairs.

So if we leave them to their own devices they will leave us alone?
I believe so yes. Go back and look at WHEN this terrorism crap started..when WE started meddling in affairs,overthrowing democratically elected leaders,etc. Our new policy should walk softly but carry a big stick. Simple.

When do you think "terrorism" started by Islamist?
Hard to say but it most certainly picked up in the 50's and 60's. Right around same time the US was overthrowing democratically elected leaders and using terrorist groups for their own uses..
 
How the US Helped Create Al Qaeda and ISIS

The last time Iran invaded another nation was in 1738. Since independence in 1776, the U.S. has been engaged in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. Despite what the Western media’s war cries would have you believe, Iran is clearly not the threat to regional security, Washington is. An Intelligence Report published in 2012, endorsed by all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, confirms that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Truth is, any Iranian nuclear ambition, real or imagined, is as a result of American hostility towards Iran, and not the other way around.
 
Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?

It would take a long time. But yes, within 50 years the US wouldn't have problems.

Question. When was the last time Latin America got bombed by ISIS?

So for 50 years we deal with them? How?

By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
 
Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Yes. The countries in the ME aren't the ones invading the US and propping up dictators here and meddling in our affairs. Its more than just leaving its leaving the whole damn area alone. When our country is in such horrible disarray there shouldn't be time to dick off meddling in another countries affairs.

So if we leave them to their own devices they will leave us alone?
I believe so yes. Go back and look at WHEN this terrorism crap started..when WE started meddling in affairs,overthrowing democratically elected leaders,etc. Our new policy should walk softly but carry a big stick. Simple.

When do you think "terrorism" started by Islamist?
Hard to say but it most certainly picked up in the 50's and 60's. Right around same time the US was overthrowing democratically elected leaders and using terrorist groups for their own uses..

If you think Islamic terrorism began in the 1950's you're sadly mistaken, throughout history they have failed to get along with anybody....that entire Crusade thing comes to mind
 
In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defense report stated, “the data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist attacks against the U.S.” Truth is, the only way America can win the “War On Terror” is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Hmm ISIS and AQ... 2 groups who fight with weapons we gave them. Sure let's go back in there. I wonder what the next crazy group to pop up will be afterwards? What we don't have to wonder about... is who they will have gotten their weapons from.

No, apparently we are too busy wasting our time using our troops as advisors to the Iraqi military there. If you are looking for where you may find possible weapons filtering in, try Iran as we seem to have reduced sanctions there in seeing them as being less of a threat.
Let us rewind to the 50's when the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran and helped a brutal dictator come to power...fast forward 20 years and the revolution happens....again the US should have stayed out because its a completely different world over there and it causes US nothing but problems in the long run.

That's one region that doesn't deserve to be playing around with enriching uranium, their "history" proves that. Cutting a deal with Iran is a mistake democrats are going to have to live with when they become an even bigger more powerful threat to the region.
 
It would take a long time. But yes, within 50 years the US wouldn't have problems.

Question. When was the last time Latin America got bombed by ISIS?

So for 50 years we deal with them? How?

By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.
 
In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defense report stated, “the data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist attacks against the U.S.” Truth is, the only way America can win the “War On Terror” is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.

Well I can promise you that we could leave them alone and they are still going to attack....they've been doing it for centuries
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Hmm ISIS and AQ... 2 groups who fight with weapons we gave them. Sure let's go back in there. I wonder what the next crazy group to pop up will be afterwards? What we don't have to wonder about... is who they will have gotten their weapons from.

No, apparently we are too busy wasting our time using our troops as advisors to the Iraqi military there. If you are looking for where you may find possible weapons filtering in, try Iran as we seem to have reduced sanctions there in seeing them as being less of a threat.
Let us rewind to the 50's when the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran and helped a brutal dictator come to power...fast forward 20 years and the revolution happens....again the US should have stayed out because its a completely different world over there and it causes US nothing but problems in the long run.

That's one region that doesn't deserve to be playing around with enriching uranium, their "history" proves that. Cutting a deal with Iran is a mistake democrats are going to have to live with when they become an even bigger more powerful threat to the region.
They gave away almost all of their uranium as part of the deal. And you've forgotten there are many more countries involved in the deal. It's not just "Democrats."
 
So for 50 years we deal with them? How?

By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.

You have no idea what caused the war with Japan. That much is obvious.
 
So for 50 years we deal with them? How?

By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.
You didn't answer the question, odious....but then no one expected you would.
 
By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.
You didn't answer the question, odious....but then no one expected you would.
Hey Odium is a Trump voter. You don't want to drive him away do you?
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Hmm ISIS and AQ... 2 groups who fight with weapons we gave them. Sure let's go back in there. I wonder what the next crazy group to pop up will be afterwards? What we don't have to wonder about... is who they will have gotten their weapons from.

No, apparently we are too busy wasting our time using our troops as advisors to the Iraqi military there. If you are looking for where you may find possible weapons filtering in, try Iran as we seem to have reduced sanctions there in seeing them as being less of a threat.
Let us rewind to the 50's when the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran and helped a brutal dictator come to power...fast forward 20 years and the revolution happens....again the US should have stayed out because its a completely different world over there and it causes US nothing but problems in the long run.

That's one region that doesn't deserve to be playing around with enriching uranium, their "history" proves that. Cutting a deal with Iran is a mistake democrats are going to have to live with when they become an even bigger more powerful threat to the region.
Iran hasn't invaded a country in over 300 years,The US is a bully with an inferiority complex or needle dick syndrome that makes it need to prove itself every 2 or 3 years but getting innocent men and women killed for the industrial military complex and big business to get rich.
 
Gitmo prisoner cleared for release after 14 years in prison

And you warmongers among us WONDER why we are so fucking hated? How about shit like this? How about propping up dictators and then sending them foreign aid? How about arming terrorist groups? How about bombing hospitals,homes,schools and using drones to murder citizens? Trump needs to END this shit with ISIS and get the fuck out of Iraq and Syria and let them mind their own damn business. PERIOD.

My apologies if this has already been covered as I'm not wasting my time combing through this thread.

Trump isn't going to end shit. Actually, he even said he wants to bomb the shit out of them, waterboarding isn't enough and while he's at it, he's going to go after the family members of terrorists, alleged or otherwise.

He supported the Iraq war as it was happening and he even supported our efforts in Libya, he's as much if not more of a hawk than Bush and Clinton and yet there is no indication that he has a clue what he is talking about. Hell, he's too busy picking fights with David Cameron because of course he is.
 
By stepping back, defending ourselves when attacks come, by not attacking either economically or militarily, or with verbal nonsense, trying to portray Islam as the enemy and so on.

So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.
You didn't answer the question, odious....but then no one expected you would.
Comprehension problem I see. I should just give up trying to knock some sense into that head full of mush of yours.
 
Serious question, do you think if we left the ME and ISIS, AQ, etc alone they would leave us alone?
Hmm ISIS and AQ... 2 groups who fight with weapons we gave them. Sure let's go back in there. I wonder what the next crazy group to pop up will be afterwards? What we don't have to wonder about... is who they will have gotten their weapons from.

No, apparently we are too busy wasting our time using our troops as advisors to the Iraqi military there. If you are looking for where you may find possible weapons filtering in, try Iran as we seem to have reduced sanctions there in seeing them as being less of a threat.
Let us rewind to the 50's when the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran and helped a brutal dictator come to power...fast forward 20 years and the revolution happens....again the US should have stayed out because its a completely different world over there and it causes US nothing but problems in the long run.

That's one region that doesn't deserve to be playing around with enriching uranium, their "history" proves that. Cutting a deal with Iran is a mistake democrats are going to have to live with when they become an even bigger more powerful threat to the region.
Iran hasn't invaded a country in over 300 years,The US is a bully with an inferiority complex or needle dick syndrome that makes it need to prove itself every 2 or 3 years but getting innocent men and women killed for the industrial military complex and big business to get rich.

Iran uses proxies to attack....rest assured they are funding and attacking
 
So we wait for them to attack us? How will we stop these attacks?

You're waiting anyway. How do you stop them? Maybe sometimes you won't stop them.

Saying that, the chances of there being anywhere near as many deaths from these attacks as people who died in Iraq is almost nil.

You reap what you sow, the seeds have been sown, you'll have to accept that some lives will be lost because of this. However, more lives will be saved by doing this, than by attacking, which will just lead to more anger, more attacks from future generations.
How many times has Japan attacked us since we nuked their ass?
Wouldn't have attacked in first place had we not committed economic terrorism against them. Course I am sure you know NOTHING nor care anything about that. Its ALWAYS the US is good and right and everyone we attack is bad.
You didn't answer the question, odious....but then no one expected you would.
Comprehension problem I see. I should just give up trying to knock some sense into that head full of mush of yours.

Hey, relax, no need to get all snarky, you didn't answer his question at all
 

Forum List

Back
Top