Lakhota
Diamond Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 167,124
- 91,638
The man, who officials say wasn't even a suspect, is still all Glenn Beck wants to talk about.
Right won't let go of Saudi conspiracy theory - Salon.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The man, who officials say wasn't even a suspect, is still all Glenn Beck wants to talk about.
The reason he gave was that the thought Americans should hear the truth directly from the government and not him. ...
How very noble.
Yeah, this doesn't reek of teaser at all, so I'm sure the one-day ratings boost was the furthest thing from his mind.
Beck has until Monday to suck my taint.
The reason he gave was that the thought Americans should hear the truth directly from the government and not him. ...
How very noble.
Yeah, this doesn't reek of teaser at all, so I'm sure the one-day ratings boost was the furthest thing from his mind.
I think Beck is right; the news should come from the government and not him. Its not about being noble, but about being realistic. Beck has a substantial following but he knows that a lot of people will not trust what he says (the responses to this thread prove him right); therefore, he will only come forth with the truth if the government doesn't. Beck is not a stupid man, and there is no way in hell he is going to risk losing credibility with his followers just for a one-day spike in ratings. I don't know how much – if anything – a single day spike in ratings would do to his career, but I doubt that Beck really needs it. I think he would be just as rich without the extra attention for a single broadcast.
However, IF he is playing games and doesn't deliver, I expect to see his ratings plummet. I, for one, will have nothing more to do with the man and I am sure that many of his fans will agree with me. I think Beck is aware of this and will not risk his reputation on some cheap stunt.
But we will soon see, won't we?
The reason he gave was that the thought Americans should hear the truth directly from the government and not him. ...
How very noble.
Yeah, this doesn't reek of teaser at all, so I'm sure the one-day ratings boost was the furthest thing from his mind.
I think Beck is right; the news should come from the government and not him. Its not about being noble, but about being realistic. Beck has a substantial following but he knows that a lot of people will not trust what he says (the responses to this thread prove him right); therefore, he will only come forth with the truth if the government doesn't. Beck is not a stupid man, and there is no way in hell he is going to risk losing credibility with his followers just for a one-day spike in ratings. I don't know how much if anything a single day spike in ratings would do to his career, but I doubt that Beck really needs it. I think he would be just as rich without the extra attention for a single broadcast.
However, IF he is playing games and doesn't deliver, I expect to see his ratings plummet. I, for one, will have nothing more to do with the man and I am sure that many of his fans will agree with me. I think Beck is aware of this and will not risk his reputation on some cheap stunt.
But we will soon see, won't we?
Will Beck admit he was wrong - or will he just try to spin his lunacy into another conspiracy theory?
"Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive" -- Sir Walter Scott
On Friday, Glenn Beck said he has information about the Boston bombing that the Government is trying to hide. Glenn warned the Government to come clean by Monday, or the Blaze would expose the truth. Check out the following video (it's less than 4 minutes).
Glenn Beck Claims to Give the Government Until Monday to Come Clean on Saudi National | Zero Hedge
Tanscript at all? I live in flintstone land of computers....
So on Tuesday when this cocksucking hack has produced nothing, can we agree never to talk about him again?